Cited by 3,992RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The codon adaptation index-a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications

Open access
Sharp, Paul M., Li, Wen-Hsiung·1987·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

A simple, effective measure of synonymous codon usage bias, the Codon Adaptation Index, is detailed. The index uses a reference set of highly expressed genes from a species to assess the relative merits of each codon, and a score for a gene is calculated from the frequency of use of all codons in that gene. The index assesses the extent to which selection has been effective in moulding the pattern of codon usage. In that respect it is useful for predicting the level of expression of a gene, for assessing the adaptation of viral genes to their hosts, and for making comparisons of codon usage in different organisms. The index may also give an approximate indication of the likely success of heterologous gene expression.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/15.3.1281

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 30 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Toh, H. (1986) FEBS Letters 194, 245-248.
  2. Miyata, T. and Hayashida, H. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 5739- 5743.
  3. Sharp, P.M. and Li, W-H. (1986) J. Mol. Evol. (in press)
  4. Li, W-H. (1987) J. Mol. Evol. (in press)
  5. Ochman, H. and Selander, R.K. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81, 198- 201.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 1,006

Metadata

Authors
Sharp, P. M., & Li, W.-H.
Affiliations
The University of Texas System (US)
Corresponding author
Sharp, Paul M.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
1987
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
1281-1295
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2018590530
Cited by
3,992
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 223 · 2025: 203 · 2024: 205 · 2023: 177 · 2022: 198 · 2021: 239 · 2020: 212 · 2019: 147 · 2018: 155 · 2017: 120 · 2016: 133 · 2015: 112 · 2014: 147 · 2013: 145 · 2012: 137
FWCI
7.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM30998)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
codon adaptation index, codon usage bias, codon usage, gene expression prediction, heterologous expression, highly expressed genes, natural selection
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Cattle, Codon, Escherichia coli, Biological Evolution, Genes, Genes, Bacterial, Genes, Fungal, Humans, Mathematics, Models, Genetic, RNA, Messenger, Saccharomyces cerevisiae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review