Cited by 44

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular evolution of ependymin and the phylogenetic resolution of early divergences among euteleost fishes

Orti, G., Meyer, A.·1996·Molecular Biology and Evolution

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025616

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although molecular phylogenetic studies have demonstrated frequent discordance between molecular data and morphological expectations, the monophyly of Siluriphysi has generally been maintained in traditional interpretations from early single-locus analyses to recent multiple genomic-scale loci, primarily to conform to morphological predictions.

    “Although numerous molecular phylogenetic studies have demonstrated frequent discordance between molecular data and morphological expectations, the monophyly of Siluriphysi has generally been maintained in traditional interpretations, from early single-locus analyses48 to recent multiple genomic-scale loci,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56 primarily to conform to morphological predictions.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. BROwN, G. G., and M. V. SIMPSON. 1982. Novel features of animal mtDNA evolution as shown by sequences of two rat cytochrome oxidase subunit II genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79:3246-3250.
  2. BUCKUP, P. A. 1991. The Characidiinae: a phylogenetic study of the South American darters and their relationships with other characiform fishes. Ph.D. dissertation. The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
  3. DIMMICK, W. W., and A. LARsON. 1996 A molecular and morphological perspective on the phylogenetic relationships of otophysan fishes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. (in press).
  4. DONOGHUE, M. J., and M. J. SANDERSON. 1992. The suitability of molecular and morphological evidence in reconstructing plant phylogeny. Pp. 340–368 in P. S. SOLTIs, D. E. SOLTIs, and J. J. DoYLE, eds., Molecular systematics of plants. Chapman and Hall, New York.
  5. FıNK, W. L. 1984. Basal euteleosts: relationships. Pp. 202–206 in H. G. MosER et al. , eds. Ontogeny and systematics of fishes. Am. Soc. Ichthyol. Herp. Spec. Publ. No. 1.
  6. KımURA, M. 1981. Estimation of evolutionary distances between homologous nucleotide sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:454 458.
  7. HASEGAWA, M., and T. HAsHIMOTO. 1993. Ribosomal RNA LUNDBERG, J. G. 1993. African-South American freshwater trees misleading? Nature 361:23. fish clades and continental drift: problems with a paradigm. HASEGAWA, M., H. KISHINO, and T. YANO. 1985. Dating of Pp. 156–199 in P. GoLDBLATT, ed. Biological relationships the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochonbetween Africa and South America. Yale University Press, drial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 22:160–174. New Haven, Conn.
  8. HEDGES, S. B., K. D. MOBERG, and L. R. MAXSON. 1990. TetRNA sequences and a review of the evidence for amniote relationships. Mol. Biol. Evol. 7:607–633.
  9. MADDISON, W. P., and D. R. MADDISON. 1992. MacClade: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 3.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass. rapod phylogeny inferred from 18S and 28S ribosomal MAGO-LECCIA, F., and T. M. ZARET. 1978. The taxonomic statis of Rhabdolichops troscheli (Kaup, 1856) and speculations on gymnotiform evolution. Environ. Biol. Fish. 3: 379-384. and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analysis. J. Hered. MEYER, A. 1993. Evolution of mitochondrial DNA of fishes. Pp. 1–38 in P. W. HOCHACHKA and P. MOMMSEN, eds. The
  10. HILLIS, D. M., and J. P. HUELSENBECK. 1992. Signal, noise, 83:189-195. biochemistry and molecular biology of fishes. Vol 2. Elsev- RosEN, D. E. 1973. Interrelationships of higher euteleostean ier, Amsterdam. fishes. Pp. 397–513 in P. H. GREENWOOD, R. S. MILES, and C. PATTERsON, eds. Interrelationships of fishes. Academic Press, London.
  11. MEYER, A. 1994a. DNA technology and phylogeny of fish. Pp. 219–249 in A. R. BEAUMONT, ed. Genetics and evolution of aquatic organisms. Chapman and Hall, London.
  12. MULLIS, K., F. FALOONA, S. SCHARF, S. SAIKI, G. HORN, and H. A. ERLICH. 1986. Specific enzymatic amplification of DNA in vitro: the polymerase chain reaction. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology 51:263–273.
  13. NELsoN, J. S. 1994. Fishes of the world. 3rd ed. John Wiley and Sons, N.Y.
  14. ORTí, G., and A. MEYER. 1996. The radiation of characiform fishes and the limits of resolution of mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences. Syst. Biol. (in press).
  15. PARRISH, J. T. 1993. The palaeogeography of the opening South Atlantic. Pp. 8–27 in W. GEORGE and R. LAVOCAT, eds. The Africa-South America connection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  16. PITMAN, W. C. I., S. CANDE, J. LABRECQUE, and J. PINDELL. 1993. Fragmentation of Gondwana: the separation of Africa from South America. Pp. 15–34 in P. GoLDBLATT, ed. Biological relationships between Africa and South America. Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.
  17. SOGIN, M. L., U. EDMAN, and H. ELWOOD. 1989. A single kingdom of eukaryotes. Pp. 133–143 in B. FERNHOLM, K. BREMER, and H. JoRNVALL, eds. The hierarchy of life. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  18. WHITT. 1991. A phylogenetic analysis of the 18S ribosomal RNA sequence of coelacanth Latimeria chalumnae. Pp. 99– 117 in J. A. MUSICK, M. N. BRUTON, and E. K. BALON, eds. The biology of Latimeria chalumnae and evolution of coelacanths. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
  19. WoESE, C. R., and G. E. Fox. 1977. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: the primary kingdoms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74:5088–5090.
  20. WOESE, C. R., O. KANDLER, and M. L. WHEELIS. 1990. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucaria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:4576–4579.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Orti, G., & Meyer, A.
Venue
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Published
1996-04-01
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
556-573
ISSN
  • 0737-4038
  • 1537-1719
Cited by
44
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review