The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Isolation and characterization of the cDNA encoding human DNA methyltransferase
Open accessAbstract
We have cloned a series of overlapping cDNA clones encoding a 5194 bp transcript for human DNA methyltransferase (DNA MTase). This sequence potentially codes for a protein of 1495 amino acids with a predicted molecular weight of 169 kDa. The human DNA MTase cDNA has eighty percent homology at the nucleotide level, and the predicted protein has seventy-four percent identity at the amino acid level, to the DNA MTase cDNA cloned from mouse cells. Like the murine DNA MTase, the amino terminal two-thirds of the human protein contains a cysteine-rich region suggestive of a metal-binding domain. The carboxy terminal one-third of the protein shows considerable similarity to prokaryotic (cytosine-5)-methyltransferases. The arrangement of multiple motifs conserved in the prokaryotic genes is preserved in the human DNA MTase, including the relative position of a proline-cysteine dipeptide thought to be an essential catalytic site in all (cytosine-5)-methyltransferases. A single 5.2 kb transcript was detected in all human tissues tested, with the highest levels of expression observed in RNA from placenta, brain, heart and lung. DNA MTase cDNA clones were used to screen a chromosome 19 genomic cosmid library. The DNA MTase-positive cosmids which are estimated to span a genomic distance of 93 kb have been localized to 19p13.2-p13.3 by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Isolation of the cDNA for human DNA MTase will allow further study of the regulation of DNA MTase expression, and of the role of this enzyme in establishing DNA methylation patterns in both normal and neoplastic cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Riggs, A. D. (1990) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1990.0012 · Cited by 126
Cited by
DNA methylation and its basic function
Moore, L. D., Le, T., & Fan, G. (2013) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2012.112 · Cited by 4,906
Robertson, K. D., Uzvolgyi, E., Liang, G., Talmadge, C., Sumegi, J., Gonzales, F. A., & Jones, P. A. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/27.11.2291 · Cited by 853
DNA methylation and chromatin – unraveling the tangled web
Robertson, K. D. (2002) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1205609 · Cited by 471
CpG and non-CpG methylation in epigenetic gene regulation and brain function
Jang, H., Shin, W., Lee, J., & Do, J. (2017) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes8060148 · Cited by 427
Serre, D., Lee, B. H., & Ting, A. H. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp992 · Cited by 404
Metadata
- Authors
- Yen, R.-W. C., Vertino, P. M., Nelkin, B. D., Yu, J. J., El-Deiry, W., Cumaraswamy, A., Lennon, G. G., Trask, B. J., Celano, P., & Baylin, S. B.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2287-2291
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2049987819
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Isolation and characterization of the cDNA encoding human DNA methyltransferase. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/20.9.2287
- The paper
- Yen, R.-W. C., Vertino, P. M., Nelkin, B. D., Yu, J. J., El-Deiry, W., Cumaraswamy, A., Lennon, G. G., Trask, B. J., Celano, P., & Baylin, S. B. (1992). Isolation and characterization of the cDNA encoding human DNA methyltransferase. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/20.9.2287
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.