The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Matlnd and Matlnspector: new fast and versatile tools for detection of consensus matches in nucleotide sequence data
Open accessAbstract
The identification of potential regulatory motifs in new sequence data is increasingly important for experimental design. Those motifs are commonly located by matches to IUPAC strings derived from consensus sequences. Although this method is simple and widely used, a major drawback of IUPAC strings is that they necessarily remove much of the information originally present in the set of sequences. Nucleotide distribution matrices retain most of the information and are thus better suited to evaluate new potential sites. However, sufficiently large libraries of pre-compiled matrices are a prerequisite for practical application of any matrix-based approach and are just beginning to emerge. Here we present a set of tools for molecular biologists that allows generation of new matrices and detection of potential sequence matches by automatic searches with a library of pre-compiled matrices. We also supply a large library (> 200) of transcription factor binding site matrices that has been compiled on the basis of published matrices as well as entries from the TRANSFAC database, with emphasis on sequences with experimentally verified binding capacity. Our search method includes position weighting of the matrices based on the information content of individual positions and calculates a relative matrix similarity. We show several examples suggesting that this matrix similarity is useful in estimating the functional potential of matrix matches and thus provides a valuable basis for designing appropriate experiments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The ENCODE Project Consortium (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05874 · Cited by 5,223
Integrated Genomic and Proteomic Analyses of a Systematically Perturbed Metabolic Network
Ideker, T., Thorsson, V., Ranish, J. A., Christmas, R., Buhler, J., Eng, J. K., Bumgarner, R., Goodlett, D. R., Aebersold, R., & Hood, L. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.292.5518.929 · Cited by 2,050
Pigeon, C., Ilyin, G., Courselaud, B., Leroyer, P., Turlin, B., Brissot, P., & Loréal, O. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m008923200 · Cited by 1,697
Transcriptional Regulatory Elements in the Human Genome
Maston, G. A., Evans, S. K., & Green, M. R. (2006) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genom.7.080505.115623 · Cited by 937
Roth, F. P., Hughes, J. D., Estep, P. W., & Church, G. M. (1998) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1098-939 · Cited by 939
Metadata
- Authors
- Quandt, K., Frech, K., Karas, H., Wingender, E., & Werner, T.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 4878-4884
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2064879068
- Cited by
- 2,588
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Matlnd and Matlnspector: new fast and versatile tools for detection of consensus matches in nucleotide sequence data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/23.23.4878
- The paper
- Quandt, K., Frech, K., Karas, H., Wingender, E., & Werner, T. (1995). Matlnd and Matlnspector: new fast and versatile tools for detection of consensus matches in nucleotide sequence data. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/23.23.4878
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.