Cited by 421Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Dali/FSSP classification of three-dimensional protein folds

Open access
Holm, L., Sander, C.·1997·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

The FSSP database presents a continuously updated structural classification of three-dimensional protein folds. It is derived using an automatic structure comparison program (Dali) for the all-against-all comparison of over 6000 three-dimensional coordinate sets in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). Sequence-related protein families are covered by a representative set of 813 protein chains. Hierachical clustering based on structural similarities yields a fold tree that defines 253 fold classes. For each representative protein chain, there is a database entry containing structure-structure alignments with its structural neighbours in the PDB. The database is accessible online through World Wide Web browsers and by anonymous ftp (file transfer protocol). The overview of fold space and the individual data sets provide a rich source of information for the study of both divergent and convergent aspects of molecular evolution, and define useful test sets and a standard of truth for assessing the correctness of sequence-sequence or sequence-structure alignments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/25.1.231

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some of the armadillo repeats in the 'stem' subdomain display the structural features of HEAT repeats, as revealed by protein folding similarity searches using the Dali server.

    “Some of the armadillo repeats in the 'stem' subdomain display the structural features of HEAT repeats, as revealed by protein folding similarity searches using the Dali server [33]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holm, L., & Sander, C.
Affiliations
European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Holm, L.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
1997-01-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
231-234
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2137345862
Cited by
421
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
protein fold classification, Dali, protein 3D structure, structural comparison, hierarchical clustering, Protein Data Bank, protein evolution
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Molecular Sequence Data, Proteins, Databases, Factual, Sequence Alignment, Protein Folding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review