Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 260

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) used in the detection of germline and somatic mutations

Open access
Liu, W., Smith, D. I., Rechtzigel, K. J., Thibodeau, S. N., James, C. D.·1998·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

Denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) has been described recently as a method for screening DNA samples for single nucleotide polymorphisms and inherited mutations. Thirty-eight DNAs, 22 of which were heterozygous for previously characterized rearranged transforming gene (RET) or cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene (CFTR) mutations or polymorphisms, were examined using DHPLC analysis to assess the accuracy of this scanning method. Ninety-one per cent (20/22) of the PCR amplicons from specimens with heterozygous RET or CFTR sequence showed elution profiles distinct from corresponding homozygous normal patterns; whether the profiles for two amplicons containing heterozygous RET sequence were distinct from homozygous cases was equivocal. To investigate the usefulness of this method for detecting mutations in tumor DNAs, each of the phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome ten gene (PTEN) exons were examined for mutations in 63 malignant gliomas. Seventeen PTEN PCR products from this series of brain tumors showed elution profiles indicating sample heterozygosity and in each instance conventional sequencing confirmed the presence of a mutation. PTEN amplicons containing exons 1, 3 and 5 were sequenced for each of the 63 tumor DNAs to determine whether any mutations may have escaped DHPLC detection, and this analysis identified one such alteration in addition to the eight mutations that DHPLC had revealed. In total, DHPLC identified 37 of 40 (92.5%) PCR products containing defined sequence variation and no alterations were indicated among 196 amplicons containing homozygous normal sequence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/26.6.1396

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 260

Metadata

Authors
Liu, W., Smith, D. I., Rechtzigel, K. J., Thibodeau, S. N., & James, C. D.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
1998-03-01
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
1396-1400
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2103535380
Cited by
260
References
1
FWCI
14.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) used in the detection of germline and somatic mutations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/26.6.1396
The paper
Liu, W., Smith, D. I., Rechtzigel, K. J., Thibodeau, S. N., & James, C. D. (1998). Denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) used in the detection of germline and somatic mutations. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/26.6.1396

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.