The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Conserved domains in DNA repair proteins and evolution of repair systems
Open accessAbstract
A detailed analysis of protein domains involved in DNA repair was performed by comparing the sequences of the repair proteins from two well-studied model organisms, the bacterium Escherichia coli and yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, to the entire sets of protein sequences encoded in completely sequenced genomes of bacteria, archaea and eukaryotes. Previously uncharacterized conserved domains involved in repair were identified, namely four families of nucleases and a family of eukaryotic repair proteins related to the proliferating cell nuclear antigen. In addition, a number of previously undetected occurrences of known conserved domains were detected; for example, a modified helix-hairpin-helix nucleic acid-binding domain in archaeal and eukaryotic RecA homologs. There is a limited repertoire of conserved domains, primarily ATPases and nucleases, nucleic acid-binding domains and adaptor (protein-protein interaction) domains that comprise the repair machinery in all cells, but very few of the repair proteins are represented by orthologs with conserved domain architecture across the three superkingdoms of life. Both the external environment of an organism and the internal environment of the cell, such as the chromatin superstructure in eukaryotes, seem to have a profound effect on the layout of the repair systems. Another factor that apparently has made a major contribution to the composition of the repair machinery is horizontal gene transfer, particularly the invasion of eukaryotic genomes by organellar genes, but also a number of likely transfer events between bacteria and archaea. Several additional general trends in the evolution of repair proteins were noticed; in particular, multiple, independent fusions of helicase and nuclease domains, and independent inactivation of enzymatic domains that apparently retain adaptor or regulatory functions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes
Jansen, R., Embden, J. D. A. V., Gaastra, W., & Schouls, L. M. (2002) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02839.x · Cited by 1,802
Horizontal gene transfer in prokaryotes: Quantification and classification
Koonin, E. V., Makarova, K. S., & Aravind, L. (2001) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.709 · Cited by 1,126
Self-citationStructural Biology of Rad50 ATPase
Hopfner, K.-P., Karcher, A., Shin, D. S., Craig, L., Arthur, L. M., Carney, J. P., & Tainer, J. A. (2000) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80890-9 · Cited by 911
Evolutionary history and higher order classification of AAA+ ATPases
Iyer, L. M., Leipe, D. D., Koonin, E. V., & Aravind, L. (2004) · Journal of Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2003.10.010 · Cited by 787
Self-citationMolecular Mechanisms of Mammalian Global Genome Nucleotide Excision Repair
Gillet, L. C. J., & Schärer, O. D. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040483f · Cited by 642
Metadata
- Authors
- Aravind, L.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-03-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1223-1242
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2125489655
- Cited by
- 560
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conserved domains in DNA repair proteins and evolution of repair systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/27.5.1223
- The paper
- Aravind, L. (1999). Conserved domains in DNA repair proteins and evolution of repair systems. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/27.5.1223
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.