The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prediction of transcription regulatory sites in Archaea by a comparative genomic approach
Open accessAbstract
Intragenomic and intergenomic comparisons of upstream nucleotide sequences of archaeal genes were performed with the goal of predicting transcription regulatory sites (operators) and identifying likely regulons. Learning sets for the detection of regulatory sites were constructed using the available experimental data on archaeal transcription regulation or by analogy with known bacterial regulons, and further analysis was performed using iterative profile searches. The information content of the candidate signals detected by this method is insufficient for reliable predictions to be made. Therefore, this approach has to be complemented by examination of evolutionary conservation in different archaeal genomes. This combined strategy resulted in the prediction of a conserved heat shock regulon in all euryarchaea, a nitrogen fixation regulon in the methanogens Methanococcus jannaschii and Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum and an aromatic amino acid regulon in M.thermoautotrophicum. Unexpectedly, the heat shock regulatory site was detected not only for genes that encode known chaperone proteins but also for archaeal histone genes. This suggests a possible function for archaeal histones in stress-related changes in DNA condensation. In addition, comparative analysis of the genomes of three Pyrococcus species resulted in the prediction of their purine metabolism and transport regulon. The results demonstrate the feasibility of prediction of at least some transcription regulatory sites by comparing poorly characterized prokaryotic genomes, particularly when several closely related genome sequences are available.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements
Kellis, M., Patterson, N., Endrizzi, M., Birren, B., & Lander, E. S. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01644 · Cited by 1,753
Comparative Genomics of the Vitamin B12 Metabolism and Regulation in Prokaryotes
Rodionov, D. A., Vitreschak, A. G., Mironov, A. A., & Gelfand, M. S. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m305837200 · Cited by 472
Self-citationWhat is Bioinformatics? A Proposed Definition and Overview of the Field
Luscombe, N. M., Greenbaum, D., & Gerstein, M. (2001) · Methods of Information in Medicine · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1634431 · Cited by 453
A survey of DNA motif finding algorithms
Das, M. K., & Dai, H.-K. (2007) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-s7-s21 · Cited by 429
Who's your neighbor? New computational approaches for functional genomics
Galperin, M. Y., & Koonin, E. V. (2000) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/76443 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Gelfand, M. S.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-02-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 695-705
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2159588654
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of transcription regulatory sites in Archaea by a comparative genomic approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/28.3.695
- The paper
- Gelfand, M. S. (2000). Prediction of transcription regulatory sites in Archaea by a comparative genomic approach. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.3.695
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.