The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Test of intron predictions reveals novel splice sites, alternatively spliced mRNAs and new introns in meiotically regulated genes of yeast
Open accessAbstract
Correct identification of all introns is necessary to discern the protein-coding potential of a eukaryotic genome. The existence of most of the spliceosomal introns predicted in the genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae remains unsupported by molecular evidence. We tested the intron predictions for 87 introns predicted to be present in non-ribosomal protein genes, more than a third of all known or suspected introns in the yeast genome. Evidence supporting 61 of these predictions was obtained, 20 predicted intron sequences were not spliced and six predictions identified an intron-containing region but failed to specify the correct splice sites, yielding a successful prediction rate of <80%. Alternative splicing has not been previously described for this organism, and we identified two genes (YKL186C/ MTR2 and YML034W) which encode alternatively spliced mRNAs; YKL186C/ MTR2 produces at least five different spliced mRNAs. One gene (YGR225W/ SPO70 ) has an intron whose removal is activated during meiosis under control of the MER1 gene. We found eight new introns, suggesting that numerous introns still remain to be discovered. The results show that correct prediction of introns remains a significant barrier to understanding the structure, function and coding capacity of eukaryotic genomes, even in a supposedly simple system like yeast.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intron—exon structures of eukaryotic model organisms
Long, M., & Deutsch, M. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/27.15.3219 · Cited by 417
Genome-wide bioinformatic and molecular analysis of introns in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
SPINGOLA, M., GRATE, L., HAUSSLER, D., & ARES, M. (1999) · RNA · doi:10.1017/s1355838299981682 · Cited by 316
Cited by
Functional consequences of developmentally regulated alternative splicing
Kalsotra, A., & Cooper, T. A. (2011) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3052 · Cited by 729
How did alternative splicing evolve?
Ast, G. (2004) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1451 · Cited by 555
Spo11 and the Formation of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Meiosis
Keeney, S. (2007) · Genome Dynamics and Stability · doi:10.1007/7050_2007_026 · Cited by 330
Lindstrom, D. L., Squazzo, S. L., Muster, N., Burckin, T. A., Wachter, K. C., Emigh, C. A., McCleery, J. A., Yates, J. R., & Hartzog, G. A. (2003) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.23.4.1368-1378.2003 · Cited by 286
Translational selection and yeast proteome evolution
Akashi, H. (2003) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/164.4.1291 · Cited by 245
Metadata
- Authors
- Davis, C. A.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-04-15
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1700-1706
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2108086419
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Test of intron predictions reveals novel splice sites, alternatively spliced mRNAs and new introns in meiotically regulated genes of yeast. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/28.8.1700
- The paper
- Davis, C. A. (2000). Test of intron predictions reveals novel splice sites, alternatively spliced mRNAs and new introns in meiotically regulated genes of yeast. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.8.1700
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.