Cited by 981DNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryProtein Structure and DynamicsRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Amino acid-base interactions: A three-dimensional analysis of protein-DNA interactions at an atomic level

Open access
Luscombe, N. M.·2001·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

To assess whether there are universal rules that govern amino acid-base recognition, we investigate hydrogen bonds, van der Waals contacts and water-mediated bonds in 129 protein-DNA complex structures. DNA-backbone interactions are the most numerous, providing stability rather than specificity. For base interactions, there are significant base-amino acid type correlations, which can be rationalised by considering the stereochemistry of protein side chains and the base edges exposed in the DNA structure. Nearly two-thirds of the direct read-out of DNA sequences involves complex networks of hydrogen bonds, which enhance specificity. Two-thirds of all protein-DNA interactions comprise van der Waals contacts, compared to about one-sixth each of hydrogen and water-mediated bonds. This highlights the central importance of these contacts for complex formation, which have previously been relegated to a secondary role. Although common, water-mediated bonds are usually non-specific, acting as space-fillers at the protein-DNA interface. In conclusion, the majority of amino acid-base interactions observed follow general principles that apply across all protein-DNA complexes, although there are individual exceptions. Therefore, we distinguish between interactions whose specificities are 'universal' and 'context-dependent'. An interactive Web-based atlas of side chain-base contacts provides access to the collected data, including analyses and visualisation of the three-dimensional geometry of the interactions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/29.13.2860

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Glycine interacts far more favorably with purine than with pyrimidine based on observed protein-DNA interactions.

    “Based on the observed contact between amino acids in a protein and bases in DNA, glycine interacts far more favorably with purine than with pyrimidine [92].”

    From Detailed Dissection and Critical Evaluation of the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA Vaccines (2021) · cites this paper as [92]

    The Hydrogen bonds section reports that glycine makes some interactions, and the van der Waals contacts section says its overall contact frequency is as expected. Neither section compares glycine’s interactions with purines and pyrimidines; searches for glycine with the individual bases and for a purine preference found no such comparison in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Seeman,N.C., Rosenberg,J.M. and Rich,A. (1976) Sequence-specific recognition of double helical nucleic acids by proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 73, 804-808.
  2. Jones,S. and Thornton,J.M. (1996) Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 13-20.
  3. Singh,J. and Thornton,J.M. (1992) Atlas of Protein Side-Chain Interactions. IRL Press, Oxford, Vols I and II.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luscombe, N. M.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Luscombe, N. M.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2001-07-01
Volume
29
Issue
13
Pages
2860-2874
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2137154596
Cited by
981
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 45
FWCI
8.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
protein-DNA interactions, hydrogen bonding, van der Waals contacts, base specificity, protein-DNA complex structure
MeSH terms
DNA, DNA-Binding Proteins, Hydrogen Bonding, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Software, Substrate Specificity, Water, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Databases as Topic, Base Pairing, Internet, Static Electricity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review