The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Relative expression software tool (REST(C)) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR
Open accessAbstract
Real-time reverse transcription followed by polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the most suitable method for the detection and quantification of mRNA. It offers high sensitivity, good reproducibility and a wide quantification range. Today, relative expression is increasingly used, where the expression of a target gene is standardised by a non-regulated reference gene. Several mathematical algorithms have been developed to compute an expression ratio, based on real-time PCR efficiency and the crossing point deviation of an unknown sample versus a control. But all published equations and available models for the calculation of relative expression ratio allow only for the determination of a single transcription difference between one control and one sample. Therefore a new software tool was established, named REST (relative expression software tool), which compares two groups, with up to 16 data points in a sample and 16 in a control group, for reference and up to four target genes. The mathematical model used is based on the PCR efficiencies and the mean crossing point deviation between the sample and control group. Subsequently, the expression ratio results of the four investigated transcripts are tested for significance by a randomisation test. Herein, development and application of REST is explained and the usefulness of relative expression in real-time PCR using REST is discussed. The latest software version of REST and examples for the correct use can be downloaded at http://www.wzw.tum.de/gene-quantification/.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments
Bustin, S. A., Benes, V., Garson, J. A., Hellemans, J., Huggett, J., Kubista, M., Mueller, R., Nolan, T., Pfaffl, M. W., Shipley, G. L., et al. (2009) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797 · Cited by 16,303
Self-citationPfaffl, M. W., Tichopad, A., Prgomet, C., & Neuvians, T. P. (2004) · Biotechnology Letters · doi:10.1023/b:bile.0000019559.84305.47 · Cited by 5,065
Self-citationAmplification efficiency: linking baseline and bias in the analysis of quantitative PCR data
Ruijter, J. M., Ramakers, C., Hoogaars, W. M. H., Karlen, Y., Bakker, O., van den Hoff, M. J. B., & Moorman, A. F. M. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp045 · Cited by 3,043
Guideline to reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR
Radonić, A., Thulke, S., Mackay, I. M., Landt, O., Siegert, W., & Nitsche, A. (2004) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.11.177 · Cited by 1,643
The real-time polymerase chain reaction
Kubista, M., Andrade, J. M., Bengtsson, M., Forootan, A., Jonák, J., Lind, K., Sindelka, R., Sjöback, R., Sjögreen, B., Strömbom, L., et al. (2006) · Molecular Aspects of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mam.2005.12.007 · Cited by 1,515
Metadata
- Authors
- Pfaffl, M. W.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-05-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 36e-36
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2099249565
- Cited by
- 7,376
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relative expression software tool (REST(C)) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/30.9.e36
- The paper
- Pfaffl, M. W. (2002). Relative expression software tool (REST(C)) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/30.9.e36
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.