Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 460

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cloning of human satellite III DNA: different components are on different chromosomes

Open access
Cooke, Howard J., Hindley, John·1979·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

Two fragments cloned from purified human satellite III DNA do not cross-react with each other. One fragment, for which a partial sequence is reported, hybridises to satellite II as well as III and is shown to originate on chromosome 1. The other cloned fragment originates from the Y chromosome. This fragment has undergone considerable changes in size when cloned in lambda gt WES lambda B. Human satellite III is shown to consist of a number of non-cross-reacting sequences which nevertheless are related by the presence of closely spaced Hin F1 sites.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/6.10.3177

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 460

Metadata

Authors
Cooke, H. J., & Hindley, J.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
1979
Volume
6
Issue
10
Pages
3177-3198
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W1973173192
Cited by
460
References
0
FWCI
17.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cloning of human satellite III DNA: different components are on different chromosomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/6.10.3177
The paper
Cooke, H. J., & Hindley, J. (1979). Cloning of human satellite III DNA: different components are on different chromosomes. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/6.10.3177

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.