Cited by 1,242RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsRNA Research and SplicingRNA modifications and cancer

Possible role of flanking nucleotides in recognition of the AUG initiator codon by eukaryotic ribosomes

Open access
Kozak, Marilyn·1981·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

Sequences flanking the initiator codon in eukaryotic mRNAs are not random. Out of 153 messages examined, 151 have either a purine in position -3, or a G in position +4, or both. Thus, [A/G]XXAUGG emerges as the favored sequence for eukaryotic initiation sites. Nucleotides flanking nonfunctional AUG triplets, which occur in the 5'-noncoding region of a few eukaryotic messages, are different from those found at most functional sites. Whereas most authentic initiator codons are preceded by a purine (usually A) in position -3, most nonfunctional AUGs have a pyrimidine in that position. The observed asymmetry suggests that purines in positions -3 and +4 might facilitate recognition of the AUG condon during formation of initiation complexes. To test this idea, in vitro binding studies were carried out with 32P-labeled oligonucleotides. Binding of AUG-containing oligonucleotides to wheat germ ribosomes was significantly enhanced by placing a purine in position -3 or +4. The scanning model, which postulates that 40S ribosomal subunits attach at the 5'-end of a message and migrate down to the AUG codon, is discussed in light of these new observations. A modified version of the scanning mechanism is proposed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/9.20.5233

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Efficient translation initiation in mammalian species depends mainly on the Kozak consensus.

    “Efficient translation initiation in mammalian species depends mainly on two factors [40,41]: (1) the Kozak consensus [42,43,44], and (2) the secondary structure that may embed the Kozak consensus to obscure these essential translation initiation signals [9,41,45].”

    From Detailed Dissection and Critical Evaluation of the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA Vaccines (2021) · cites this paper as [43]

    In the section on nucleotides flanking the initiator codon (page unavailable), Kozak proposes that favorable flanking nucleotides improve the efficiency with which ribosomes recognize an AUG. The paper examines eukaryotic messages and tests binding to wheat-germ ribosomes; it does not establish that mammalian translation initiation depends mainly on the consensus. It also says AUG position appears to be the primary determinant of a functional initiation site. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Steitz, J.A. (1979) in Biological Regulation and Development, Goldberger, R.F., Ed., pp. 349-399, Plerium Press, New York.
  2. Dunn, J.J., Buzash-Pollert, E. and Studier, F.W. (1978) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75, 2741-2745.
  3. Schwartz, M., Roa, M. and Debarbouille, M. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 2937-2941.
  4. Ghosh, P.K., Lebowitz, P., Frisque, R.J. and Gluzman, Y. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 100-104.
  5. Firtel, R.A., Timm, R., Kimmel, A.R. and McKeown, M. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76, 6206-6210.
  6. Montgomery, D.L., Leung, D.W., Smith, M., Shalit, P., Faye, G. and Hall, B.D. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77, 541-545.
  7. Kozak, M. (1981) in Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, Shatkin, A.J., Ed., Vol. 93, pp. 81-123, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  8. Barrell, B.G. (1971) in Procedures in Nucleic Acid Research, Cantoni, G.L. and Davies, D.R., Eds. Vol.2, pp. 751-779.
  9. Tonegawa, S., Maxam, A.M., Tizard, R., Bernard, 0. and Gilbert, W. (1978) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75, 1485-1489.
  10. Racaniello, V.R. and Baltimore, D. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, in press.
  11. Rice, C.M. and Strauss, J.H. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 2062- 2066.
  12. Garoff, H., Frischauf, A.M., Simons, K., Lehrach, H. and Delius, H. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77, 6376-6380.
  13. Matthyssens, G. and Rabbitts, T.H. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77, 6561-6565.
  14. Lin, Y. and Gross, J.K. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 2825-2829.
  15. Reddy, E.P., Smith, M.J., Canaani, E., Robbins, K.C., Tronick, S.R., Zain, S. and Aaronson, S.A. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77, 5234-5238.
  16. Vogeli, G., Ohkubo, H., Sobel, M.E., Yamada, Y., Pastan, I. and deCrom- brugghe, B. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, in press.
  17. Shih, D.S., Shih, C.T., Kew, O., Pallansch, M., Rueckert, R. and Kaesberg, P. (1978) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75, 5807-5811.
  18. Piatak, M., Ghosh, P.K., Reddy, V.B., Lebowitz, P. and Weissman, S.M. (1979) in Extrachromosomal DNA. ICN-UCLA Symposia on Molecular and Cellu- lar Biology, Cummings, D.J., Borst, P., Dawid, I.B., Weissman, S.M. and Fox, C.F., Eds.,Vol. XV, pp. 199-215, Academic Press, New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kozak, M.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Kozak, Marilyn
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
1981
Volume
9
Issue
20
Pages
5233-5252
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2020828649
Cited by
1,242
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
37.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA modifications and cancer
Keywords
initiator codon, AUG codon, eukaryotic translation initiation, 5' untranslated region, ribosome binding, scanning model, 40S ribosomal subunit, oligonucleotide binding
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Codon, Genetic Code, Oligoribonucleotides, Plants, Ribosomes, RNA, Messenger, Protein Biosynthesis, Triticum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review