Cited by 38Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsProtein purification and stability

Systematic use of synthetic 5′-UTR RNA structures to tune protein translation improves yield and quality of complex proteins in mammalian cell factories

Open access
Eisenhut, Peter, Mebrahtu, Aman, Moradi Barzadd, Mona, Thalén, Niklas, Klanert, Gerald, Weinguny, Marcus, Sandegren, Anna, Su, Chao +3 more·2020·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

Predictably regulating protein expression levels to improve recombinant protein production has become an important tool, but is still rarely applied to engineer mammalian cells. We therefore sought to set-up an easy-to-implement toolbox to facilitate fast and reliable regulation of protein expression in mammalian cells by introducing defined RNA hairpins, termed ‘regulation elements (RgE)’, in the 5′-untranslated region (UTR) to impact translation efficiency. RgEs varying in thermodynamic stability, GC-content and position were added to the 5′-UTR of a fluorescent reporter gene. Predictable translation dosage over two orders of magnitude in mammalian cell lines of hamster and human origin was confirmed by flow cytometry. Tuning heavy chain expression of an IgG with the RgEs to various levels eventually resulted in up to 3.5-fold increased titers and fewer IgG aggregates and fragments in CHO cells. Co-expression of a therapeutic Arylsulfatase-A with RgE-tuned levels of the required helper factor SUMF1 demonstrated that the maximum specific sulfatase activity was already attained at lower SUMF1 expression levels, while specific production rates steadily decreased with increasing helper expression. In summary, we show that defined 5′-UTR RNA-structures represent a valid tool to systematically tune protein expression levels in mammalian cells and eventually help to optimize recombinant protein expression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkaa847

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An extensively stable secondary structure with high GC content in the 5′ UTR, particularly in the 5′-proximal region, tends to decrease translation efficiency.

    “It is well established that an extensively stable secondary structure with high GC content in the 5′ UTR -particularly in the 5′-proximal region -tends to decrease translation efficiency [10,34].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 72

  1. [1]Grabow S., Kueh A.J., Ke F., Vanyai H.K., Sheikh B.N., Dengler M.A., Chiang W., Eccles S., Smyth I.M., Jones L.K. et al. Subtle changes in the levels of BCL-2 proteins cause severe craniofacial abnormalities. Cell Rep. 2018; 24: 3285– 3295. 30232009
  2. [2]Lee T.I., Young R.A. Transcriptional regulation and its misregulation in disease. Cell. 2013; 152: 1237– 1251. 23498934 PMC3640494
  3. [3]Wei F., Zhong S., Ma Z., Kong H., Medvec A., Ahmed R., Freeman G.J., Krogsgaard M., Riley J.L. Strength of PD-1 signaling differentially affects T-cell effector functions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013; 110: E2480– E2489. 23610399 PMC3703988
  4. [6]Wang Q., Chen Y., Park J., Liu X., Hu Y., Wang T., McFarland K., Betenbaugh M.J. Design and production of bispecific antibodies. Antibodies (Basel). 2019; 8: 43. PMC6783844 31544849
  5. [7]Brinkmann U., Kontermann R.E. The making of bispecific antibodies. MAbs. 2017; 9: 182– 212. 28071970 PMC5297537
  6. [8]Cartwright J.F., Arnall C.L., Patel Y.D., Barber N.O.W., Lovelady C.S., Rosignoli G., Harris C.L., Dunn S., Field R.P., Dean G. et al. A platform for context-specific genetic engineering of recombinant protein production by CHO cells. J. Biotechnol. 2020; 312: 11– 22. 32114154
  7. [9]Pybus L.P., Dean G., West N.R., Smith A., Daramola O., Field R., Wilkinson S.J., James D.C. Model-directed engineering of ‘difficult-to-express’ monoclonal antibody production by Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2014; 111: 372– 385. 24081924
  8. [10]Brown A.J., James D.C. Precision control of recombinant gene transcription for CHO cell synthetic biology. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016; 34: 492– 503. 26721629
  9. [11]Hansen H.G., Pristovšek N., Kildegaard H.F., Lee G.M. Improving the secretory capacity of Chinese hamster ovary cells by ectopic expression of effector genes: lessons learned and future directions. Biotechnol. Adv. 2017; 35: 64– 76. 27931938
  10. [12]McNerney M.P., Watstein D.M., Styczynski M.P. Precision metabolic engineering: the design of responsive, selective, and controllable metabolic systems. Metab. Eng. 2015; 31: 123– 131. 26189665 PMC4770000
  11. [13]Brown A.J., Sweeney B., Mainwaring D.O., James D.C. Synthetic promoters for CHO cell engineering. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2014; 111: 1638– 1647. 24615264
  12. [14]Alper H., Fischer C., Nevoigt E., Stephanopoulos G. Tuning genetic control through promoter engineering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005; 102: 12678– 12683. 16123130 PMC1200280
  13. [15]Gordon G.C., Korosh T.C., Cameron J.C., Markley A.L., Begemann M.B., Pfleger B.F. CRISPR interference as a titratable, trans-acting regulatory tool for metabolic engineering in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7002. Metab. Eng. 2016; 38: 170– 179. 27481676 PMC5107151
  14. [16]Engstrom M.D., Pfleger B.F. Transcription control engineering and applications in synthetic biology. Synth. Syst. Biotechnol. 2017; 2: 176– 191. 29318198 PMC5655343
  15. [17]Brown A.J., Gibson S.J., Hatton D., James D.C. In silico design of context-responsive mammalian promoters with user-defined functionality. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017; 45: 10906– 10919. 28977454 PMC5737543
  16. [18]Ferreira J.P., Peacock R.W.S., Lawhorn I.E.B., Wang C.L. Modulating ectopic gene expression levels by using retroviral vectors equipped with synthetic promoters. Syst. Synth. Biol. 2011; 5: 131– 138. 23205156 PMC3234317
  17. [19]Michaels Y.S., Barnkob M.B., Barbosa H., Baeumler T.A., Thompson M.K., Andre V., Colin-York H., Fritzsche M., Gileadi U., Sheppard H.M. et al. Precise tuning of gene expression levels in mammalian cells. Nat. Commun. 2019; 10: 818. 30778069 PMC6379387
  18. [20]Ausländer S., Fussenegger M. Engineering gene circuits for mammalian cell-based applications. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2016; 8: a023895. 27194045 PMC4930925
  19. [21]Yokobayashi Y. Aptamer-based and aptazyme-based riboswitches in mammalian cells. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2019; 52: 72– 78. 31238268 PMC7108311
  20. [22]Chang A.L., Wolf J.J., Smolke C.D. Synthetic RNA switches as a tool for temporal and spatial control over gene expression. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2012; 23: 679– 688. 22305712 PMC3354030
  21. [23]Petersen S.D., Zhang J., Lee J.S., Jakočiūnas T., Grav L.M., Kildegaard H.F., Keasling J.D., Jensen M.K. Modular 5′-UTR hexamers for context-independent tuning of protein expression in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46: e127. 30124898 PMC6265478
  22. [24]Ferreira J.P., Overton K.W., Wang C.L. Tuning gene expression with synthetic upstream open reading frames. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013; 110: 11284– 11289. 23798422 PMC3710870
  23. [25]Blanco N., Williams A.J., Tang D., Zhan D., Misaghi S., Kelley R.F., Simmons L.C. Tailoring translational strength using Kozak sequence variants improves bispecific antibody assembly and reduces product-related impurities in CHO cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2020; 117: 1946– 1960. 32246763
  24. [26]Leppek K., Das R., Barna M. Functional 5′ UTR mRNA structures in eukaryotic translation regulation and how to find them. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018; 19: 158– 174. 29165424 PMC5820134
  25. [27]Kozak M. Influences of mRNA secondary structure on initiation by eukaryotic ribosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1986; 83: 2850– 2854. 3458245 PMC323404
  26. [28]Kozak M. Circumstances and mechanisms of inhibition of translation by secondary structure in eucaryotic mRNAs. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1989; 9: 5134– 5142. 2601712 PMC363665
  27. [29]Endo K., Stapleton J.A., Hayashi K., Saito H., Inoue T. Quantitative and simultaneous translational control of distinct mammalian mRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41: e135. 23685611 PMC3711428
  28. [30]Parsyan A., Svitkin Y., Shahbazian D., Gkogkas C., Lasko P., Merrick W.C., Sonenberg N. mRNA helicases: the tacticians of translational control. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011; 12: 235– 245. 21427765
  29. [31]Babendure J.R., Babendure J.L., Ding J.-H., Tsien R.Y. Control of mammalian translation by mRNA structure near caps. RNA. 2006; 12: 851– 861. 16540693 PMC1440912
  30. [32]Lamping E., Niimi M., Cannon R.D. Small, synthetic, GC-rich mRNA stem-loop modules 5′ proximal to the AUG start-codon predictably tune gene expression in yeast. Microb. Cell Fact. 2013; 12: 74. 23895661 PMC3765126
  31. [33]Weenink T., van der Hilst J., McKiernan R.M., Ellis T. Design of RNA hairpin modules that predictably tune translation in yeast. Synth. Biol. 2018; 3: ysy019. PMC7445769 32995525
  32. [34]Schlatter S., Stansfield S.H., Dinnis D.M., Racher A.J., Birch J.R., James D.C. On the optimal ratio of heavy to light chain genes for efficient recombinant antibody production by CHO cells. Biotechnol. Prog. 2005; 21: 122– 133. 15903249
  33. [35]Ho S.C.L., Koh E.Y.C., van Beers M., Mueller M., Wan C., Teo G., Song Z., Tong Y.W., Bardor M., Yang Y. Control of IgG LC:HC ratio in stably transfected CHO cells and study of the impact on expression, aggregation, glycosylation and conformational stability. J. Biotechnol. 2013; 165: 157– 166. 23583871
  34. [36]Ho S.C.L., Wang T., Song Z., Yang Y. IgG aggregation mechanism for CHO cell lines expressing excess heavy chains. Mol. Biotechnol. 2015; 57: 625– 634. 25744439
  35. [37]Cosma M.P., Pepe S., Annunziata I., Newbold R.F., Grompe M., Parenti G., Ballabio A. The multiple sulfatase deficiency gene encodes an essential and limiting factor for the activity of sulfatases. Cell. 2003; 113: 445– 456. 12757706
  36. [38]Fraldi A., Biffi A., Lombardi A., Visigalli I., Pepe S., Settembre C., Nusco E., Auricchio A., Naldini L., Ballabio A. et al. SUMF1 enhances sulfatase activities in vivo in five sulfatase deficiencies. Biochem. J. 2007; 403: 305– 312. 17206939 PMC1874239
  37. [39]Lorenz R., Bernhart S.H., Höner Zu Siederdissen C., Tafer H., Flamm C., Stadler P.F., Hofacker I.L. ViennaRNA package 2.0. Algorith. Mol. Biol. 2011; 6: 26. PMC3319429 22115189
  38. [40]Bauer D.E., Canver M.C., Orkin S.H. Generation of genomic deletions in mammalian cell lines via CRISPR/Cas9. J. Vis. Exp. 2015; e52118 doi:10.3791/52118. 25549070 PMC4279820 · DOI
  39. [41]Klanert G., Fernandez D.J., Weinguny M., Eisenhut P., Bühler E., Melcher M., Titus S.A., Diendorfer A.B., Gludovacz E., Jadhav V. et al. A cross-species whole genome siRNA screen in suspension-cultured Chinese hamster ovary cells identifies novel engineering targets. Sci. Rep. 2019; 9: 8689. 31213643 PMC6582146
  40. [42]Weinguny M., Eisenhut P., Klanert G., Virgolini N., Marx N., Jonsson A., Ivansson D., Lövgren A., Borth N. Random epigenetic modulation of CHO cells by repeated knock-down of DNA-methyltransferases increases population diversity and enables sorting of cells with higher production capacities. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2020; doi:10.1002/bit.27493. PMC7818401 32662873 · DOI
  41. [43]Lundqvist M., Edfors F., Sivertsson Å., Hallström B.M., Hudson E.P., Tegel H., Holmberg A., Uhlén M., Rockberg J. Solid-phase cloning for high-throughput assembly of single and multiple DNA parts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43: e49. 25618848 PMC4402512
  42. [44]Hu F.J., Lundqvist M., Uhlén M., Rockberg J. SAMURAI (solid-phase assisted mutagenesis by uracil restriction for accurate integration) for antibody affinity maturation and paratope mapping. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47: e34. 30715449 PMC6451119
  43. [45]Livak K.J., Schmittgen T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001; 25: 402– 408. 11846609
  44. [46]Lee-Vaupel M., Conzelmann E. A simple chromogenic assay for arylsulfatase A. Clin. Chim. Acta. 1987; 164: 171– 180. 2885112
  45. [47]Gludovacz E., Maresch D., Bonta M., Szöllösi H., Furtmüller P.G., Weik R., Altmann F., Limbeck A., Borth N., Jilma B. et al. Characterization of recombinant human diamine oxidase (rhDAO) produced in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells. J. Biotechnol. 2016; 227: 120– 130. 27063138
  46. [49]Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. 2016; NY Springer-Verlag Publishing.
  47. [50]Durand G., Dausse E., Goux E., Fiore E., Peyrin E., Ravelet C., Toulmé J.-J. A combinatorial approach to the repertoire of RNA kissing motifs; towards multiplex detection by switching hairpin aptamers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44: 4450– 4459. 27067541 PMC4872101
  48. [51]Zarrin A.A., Malkin L., Fong I., Luk K.D., Ghose A., Berinstein N.L. Comparison of CMV, RSV, SV40 viral and Vλ1 cellular promoters in B and T lymphoid and non-lymphoid cell lines. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1999; 1446: 135– 139. 10395926
  49. [52]Fischer S., Handrick R., Otte K. The art of CHO cell engineering: a comprehensive retrospect and future perspectives. Biotechnol. Adv. 2015; 33: 1878– 1896. 26523782
  50. [53]Zito E., Buono M., Pepe S., Settembre C., Annunziata I., Surace E.M., Dierks T., Monti M., Cozzolino M., Pucci P. et al. Sulfatase modifying factor 1 trafficking through the cells: from endoplasmic reticulum to the endoplasmic reticulum. EMBO J. 2007; 26: 2443– 2453. 17446859 PMC1868907
  51. [54]Ganoza M.C., Kiel M.C., Aoki H. Evolutionary conservation of reactions in translation. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2002; 66: 460– 485. 12209000 PMC120792
  52. [55]Whitehead T.A., Banta S., Bentley W.E., Betenbaugh M.J., Chan C., Clark D.S., Hoesli C.A., Jewett M.C., Junker B., Koffas M. et al. The Importance and Future of Biochemical Engineering. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2020; 117: 2305– 2318. 32343367 PMC7354896
  53. [56]Araujo P.R., Yoon K., Ko D., Smith A.D., Qiao M., Suresh U., Burns S.C., Penalva L.O.F. Before it gets started: regulating translation at the 5′ UTR. Int. J. Genomics. 2012; 2012: 475731. PMC3368165 22693426
  54. [57]Chappell S.A., Dresios J., Edelman G.M., Mauro V.P. Ribosomal shunting mediated by a translational enhancer element that base pairs to 18S rRNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006; 103: 9488– 9493. 16769881 PMC1480434
  55. [58]Al-Saif M., Khabar K.S. UU/UA dinucleotide frequency reduction in coding regions results in increased mRNA stability and protein expression. Mol. Ther. 2012; 20: 954– 959. 22434136 PMC3345983
  56. [59]Duan J., Antezana M.A. Mammalian mutation pressure, synonymous codon choice, and mRNA degradation. J. Mol. Evol. 2003; 57: 694– 701. 14745538
  57. [60]Burger K., Gullerova M. Swiss army knives: non-canonical functions of nuclear Drosha and Dicer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015; 16: 417– 430. 26016561
  58. [61]Han J., Pedersen J.S., Kwon S.C., Belair C.D., Kim Y.-K., Yeom K.-H., Yang W.-Y., Haussler D., Blelloch R., Kim V.N. Posttranscriptional Crossregulation between Drosha and DGCR8. Cell. 2009; 136: 75– 84. 19135890 PMC2680683
  59. [62]Artsimovitch I., Landick R. Interaction of a nascent RNA structure with RNA polymerase is required for hairpin-dependent transcriptional pausing but not for transcript release. Genes Dev. 1998; 12: 3110– 3122. 9765211 PMC317188
  60. [63]Wang D., Severinov K., Landick R. Preferential interaction of the his pause RNA hairpin with RNA polymerase β subunit residues 904–950 correlates with strong transcriptional pausing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997; 94: 8433– 8438. 9237994 PMC22946
  61. [64]Coats M.T., Bydlinski N., Maresch D., Diendorfer A., Klanert G., Borth N. mRNA transfection into CHO-cells reveals production bottlenecks. Biotechnol. J. 2020; 15: e1900198. 31475780
  62. [65]Leonhardt C., Schwake G., Stögbauer T.R., Rappl S., Kuhr J.-T., Ligon T.S., Rädler J.O. Single-cell mRNA transfection studies: delivery, kinetics and statistics by numbers. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2014; 10: 679– 688. 24333584
  63. [66]Stoyle C.L., Stephens P.E., Humphreys D.P., Heywood S., Cain K., Bulleid N.J. IgG light chain-independent secretion of heavy chain dimers: consequence for therapeutic antibody production and design. Biochem. J. 2017; 474: 3179– 3188. 28784690 PMC5590090
  64. [67]Lian J., Mishra S., Zhao H. Recent advances in metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: New tools and their applications. Metab. Eng. 2018; 50: 85– 108. 29702275
  65. [68]Eisenhut P., Klanert G., Weinguny M., Baier L., Jadhav V., Ivansson D., Borth N. A CRISPR/Cas9 based engineering strategy for overexpression of multiple genes in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Metab. Eng. 2018; 48: 72– 81. 29852271
  66. [69]Liu B., Merriman D.K., Choi S.H., Schumacher M.A., Plangger R., Kreutz C., Horner S.M., Meyer K.D., Al-Hashimi H.M. A potentially abundant junctional RNA motif stabilized by m6A and Mg2+. Nat. Commun. 2018; 9: 2761. 30018356 PMC6050335
  67. [70]Liu X.-M., Zhou J., Mao Y., Ji Q., Qian S.-B. Programmable RNA N 6 -methyladenosine editing by CRISPR-Cas9 conjugates. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2019; 15: 865– 871. 31383972 PMC6702037
  68. [71]Saito H., Inoue T. Synthetic biology with RNA motifs. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2009; 41: 398– 404. 18775792
  69. [72]Goverdhana S., Puntel M., Xiong W., Zirger J.M., Barcia C., Curtin J.F., Soffer E.B., Mondkar S., King G.D., Hu J. et al. Regulatable gene expression systems for gene therapy applications: progress and future challenges. Mol. Ther. 2005; 12: 189– 211. 15946903 PMC2676204
  70. [73]Naidoo J., Young D. Gene regulation systems for gene therapy applications in the central nervous system. Neurol. Res. Int. 2012; 2012: 595410. 22272373 PMC3261487
  71. [74]Isomura H., Stinski M.F., Kudoh A., Nakayama S., Murata T., Sato Y., Iwahori S., Tsurumi T. A cis element between the TATA box and the transcription start site of the major immediate-early promoter of human cytomegalovirus determines efficiency of viral replication. J. Virol. 2008; 82: 849– 858. 17989180 PMC2224595
  72. [75]Xu P., Gu Q., Wang W., Wong L., Bower A.G.W., Collins C.H., Koffas M.A.G. Modular optimization of multi-gene pathways for fatty acids production in E. coli. Nat. Commun. 2013; 4: 1409. 23361000

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eisenhut, P., Mebrahtu, A., Moradi Barzadd, M., Thalén, N., Klanert, G., Weinguny, M., Sandegren, A., Su, C., Hatton, D., Borth, N., & Rockberg, J.
Affiliations
  • Austrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology (Austria) (AT)
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Protein Science, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Affibody (Sweden) (SE)
  • SOBI AB, Tomtebodavägen 23A, Stockholm, Sweden
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Borth, Nicole
  • Rockberg, Johan
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2020-10-13
Volume
48
Issue
20
Pages
e119-e119
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W3092177332
Cited by
38
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Austrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology
  • BMVIT
  • BMDW
  • SFG
  • Standortagentur Tirol
  • Austrian Science Fund (W1224)
  • VINNOVA
  • CellNova
  • AAVNova
  • AdBioPro
  • Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (SB16-0017)
  • Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF10CC1016517)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
Keywords
5' untranslated region, RNA hairpin, translation efficiency, protein expression regulation, recombinant protein expression, CHO cells, IgG heavy chain, SUMF1, arylsulfatase A, helper factor, protein aggregation, fluorescent reporter
MeSH terms
Animals, Cerebroside-Sulfatase, Cricetulus, Gene Expression Regulation, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Recombinant Proteins, Protein Biosynthesis, Protein Engineering, Gene Expression, CHO Cells, 5' Untranslated Regions, Oxidoreductases Acting on Sulfur Group Donors, Inverted Repeat Sequences, HEK293 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review