Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,339

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The reactome pathway knowledgebase 2022

Open access
Gillespie, Marc, Jassal, Bijay, Stephan, Ralf, Milacic, Marija, Rothfels, Karen, Senff-Ribeiro, Andrea, Griss, Johannes, Sevilla, Cristoffer, Matthews, Lisa, Gong, Chuqiao, Deng, Chuan, Varusai, Thawfeek, Ragueneau, Eliot, Haider, Yusra, May, Bruce, Shamovsky, Veronica, Weiser, Joel, Brunson, Timothy, Sanati, Nasim, Beckman, Liam, Shao, Xiang, Fabregat, Antonio, Sidiropoulos, Konstantinos, Murillo, Julieth, Viteri, Guilherme, Cook, Justin, Shorser, Solomon, Bader, Gary, Demir, Emek, Sander, Chris, Haw, Robin, Wu, Guanming, Stein, Lincoln, Hermjakob, Henning, D’Eustachio, Peter·2022·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

The Reactome Knowledgebase (https://reactome.org), an Elixir core resource, provides manually curated molecular details across a broad range of physiological and pathological biological processes in humans, including both hereditary and acquired disease processes. The processes are annotated as an ordered network of molecular transformations in a single consistent data model. Reactome thus functions both as a digital archive of manually curated human biological processes and as a tool for discovering functional relationships in data such as gene expression profiles or somatic mutation catalogs from tumor cells. Recent curation work has expanded our annotations of normal and disease-associated signaling processes and of the drugs that target them, in particular infections caused by the SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 coronaviruses and the host response to infection. New tools support better simultaneous analysis of high-throughput data from multiple sources and the placement of understudied (‘dark’) proteins from analyzed datasets in the context of Reactome’s manually curated pathways.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkab1028

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 2,339

Metadata

Authors
Gillespie, M., Jassal, B., Stephan, R., Milacic, M., Rothfels, K., Senff-Ribeiro, A., Griss, J., Sevilla, C., Matthews, L., Gong, C., Deng, C., Varusai, T., Ragueneau, E., Haider, Y., May, B., Shamovsky, V., Weiser, J., Brunson, T., Sanati, N., Beckman, L., Shao, X., Fabregat, A., Sidiropoulos, K., Murillo, J., Viteri, G., Cook, J., Shorser, S., Bader, G., Demir, E., Sander, C., Haw, R., Wu, G., Stein, L., Hermjakob, H., & D’Eustachio, P.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2021-11-12
Volume
50
Issue
D1
Pages
D687-D692
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W3211402536
Cited by
2,339
References
24
FWCI
120.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (U41HG003751, U54GM114833, U01CA239069)
  • European Bioinformatics Institute
  • Open Targets
  • University of Toronto

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The reactome pathway knowledgebase 2022. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkab1028
The paper
Gillespie, M., Jassal, B., Stephan, R., Milacic, M., Rothfels, K., Senff-Ribeiro, A., Griss, J., Sevilla, C., Matthews, L., Gong, C., Deng, C., Varusai, T., Ragueneau, E., Haider, Y., May, B., Shamovsky, V., Weiser, J., Brunson, T., Sanati, N., . . . D’Eustachio, P. (2022). The reactome pathway knowledgebase 2022. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab1028

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.