Cited by 36Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

smORFer: a modular algorithm to detect small ORFs in prokaryotes

Open access
Bartholomäus, Alexander, Kolte, Baban, Mustafayeva, Ayten, Goebel, Ingrid, Fuchs, Stephan, Benndorf, Dirk, Engelmann, Susanne, Ignatova, Zoya·2021·Nucleic Acids Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Emerging evidence places small proteins (≤50 amino acids) more centrally in physiological processes. Yet, their functional identification and the systematic genome annotation of their cognate small open-reading frames (smORFs) remains challenging both experimentally and computationally. Ribosome profiling or Ribo-Seq (that is a deep sequencing of ribosome-protected fragments) enables detecting of actively translated open-reading frames (ORFs) and empirical annotation of coding sequences (CDSs) using the in-register translation pattern that is characteristic for genuinely translating ribosomes. Multiple identifiers of ORFs that use the 3-nt periodicity in Ribo-Seq data sets have been successful in eukaryotic smORF annotation. They have difficulties evaluating prokaryotic genomes due to the unique architecture (e.g. polycistronic messages, overlapping ORFs, leaderless translation, non-canonical initiation etc.). Here, we present a new algorithm, smORFer, which performs with high accuracy in prokaryotic organisms in detecting putative smORFs. The unique feature of smORFer is that it uses an integrated approach and considers structural features of the genetic sequence along with in-frame translation and uses Fourier transform to convert these parameters into a measurable score to faithfully select smORFs. The algorithm is executed in a modular way, and dependent on the data available for a particular organism, different modules can be selected for smORF search.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkab477

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Bartholomäus, A., Kolte, B., Mustafayeva, A., Goebel, I., Fuchs, S., Benndorf, D., Engelmann, S., & Ignatova, Z.
Affiliations
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (DE)
  • Robert Koch Institute (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Bartholomäus, Alexander
  • Ignatova, Zoya
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2021-06-14
Volume
49
Issue
15
Pages
e89-e89
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W3170179436
Cited by
36
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Publication server of the Robert Koch Institute (Robert Kock Institute) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HZI (Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (IG 73/16-1, GRK PROCOMPAS)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
small open reading frames, small proteins, prokaryotic genome annotation, ribosome profiling, Fourier transform, polycistronic mRNA
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Prokaryotic Cells, Ribosomes, Protein Biosynthesis, Open Reading Frames, Genome, Computational Biology, Eukaryota, Molecular Sequence Annotation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review