Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 819

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The ProteomeXchange consortium at 10 years: 2023 update

Open access
Deutsch, Eric W, Bandeira, Nuno, Perez-Riverol, Yasset, Sharma, Vagisha, Carver, Jeremy J, Mendoza, Luis, Kundu, Deepti J, Wang, Shengbo, Bandla, Chakradhar, Kamatchinathan, Selvakumar, Hewapathirana, Suresh, Pullman, Benjamin S, Wertz, Julie, Sun, Zhi, Kawano, Shin, Okuda, Shujiro, Watanabe, Yu, MacLean, Brendan, MacCoss, Michael J, Zhu, Yunping, Ishihama, Yasushi, Vizcaíno, Juan Antonio·2023·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

Mass spectrometry (MS) is by far the most used experimental approach in high-throughput proteomics. The ProteomeXchange (PX) consortium of proteomics resources (http://www.proteomexchange.org) was originally set up to standardize data submission and dissemination of public MS proteomics data. It is now 10 years since the initial data workflow was implemented. In this manuscript, we describe the main developments in PX since the previous update manuscript in Nucleic Acids Research was published in 2020. The six members of the Consortium are PRIDE, PeptideAtlas (including PASSEL), MassIVE, jPOST, iProX and Panorama Public. We report the current data submission statistics, showcasing that the number of datasets submitted to PX resources has continued to increase every year. As of June 2022, more than 34 233 datasets had been submitted to PX resources, and from those, 20 062 (58.6%) just in the last three years. We also report the development of the Universal Spectrum Identifiers and the improvements in capturing the experimental metadata annotations. In parallel, we highlight that data re-use activities of public datasets continue to increase, enabling connections between PX resources and other popular bioinformatics resources, novel research and also new data resources. Finally, we summarise the current state-of-the-art in data management practices for sensitive human (clinical) proteomics data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkac1040

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Cited by

See all 819

Metadata

Authors
Deutsch, E. W., Bandeira, N., Perez-Riverol, Y., Sharma, V., Carver, J. J., Mendoza, L., Kundu, D. J., Wang, S., Bandla, C., Kamatchinathan, S., Hewapathirana, S., Pullman, B. S., Wertz, J., Sun, Z., Kawano, S., Okuda, S., Watanabe, Y., MacLean, B., MacCoss, M. J., Zhu, Y., Ishihama, Y., & Vizcaíno, J. A.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2022-11-12
Volume
51
Issue
D1
Pages
D1539-D1548
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W4308834828
Cited by
819
References
61
FWCI
55.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The ProteomeXchange consortium at 10 years: 2023 update. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkac1040
The paper
Deutsch, E. W., Bandeira, N., Perez-Riverol, Y., Sharma, V., Carver, J. J., Mendoza, L., Kundu, D. J., Wang, S., Bandla, C., Kamatchinathan, S., Hewapathirana, S., Pullman, B. S., Wertz, J., Sun, Z., Kawano, S., Okuda, S., Watanabe, Y., MacLean, B., MacCoss, M. J., . . . Vizcaíno, J. A. (2023). The ProteomeXchange consortium at 10 years: 2023 update. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac1040

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.