The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PHASTEST: faster than PHASTER, better than PHAST
Open accessAbstract
PHASTEST (PHAge Search Tool with Enhanced Sequence Translation) is the successor to the PHAST and PHASTER prophage finding web servers. PHASTEST is designed to support the rapid identification, annotation and visualization of prophage sequences within bacterial genomes and plasmids. PHASTEST also supports rapid annotation and interactive visualization of all other genes (protein coding regions, tRNA/tmRNA/rRNA sequences) in bacterial genomes. Given that bacterial genome sequencing has become so routine, the need for fast tools to comprehensively annotate bacterial genomes has become progressively more important. PHASTEST not only offers faster and more accurate prophage annotations than its predecessors, it also provides more complete whole genome annotations and much improved genome visualization capabilities. In standardized tests, we found that PHASTEST is 31% faster and 2–3% more accurate in prophage identification than PHASTER. Specifically, PHASTEST can process a typical bacterial genome in 3.2 min (raw sequence) or in 1.3 min when given a pre-annotated GenBank file. Improvements in PHASTEST’s ability to annotate bacterial genomes now make it a particularly powerful tool for whole genome annotation. In addition, PHASTEST now offers a much more modern and responsive visualization interface that allows users to generate, edit, annotate and interactively visualize (via zooming, rotating, dragging, panning, resetting), colourful, publication quality genome maps. PHASTEST continues to offer popular options such as an API for programmatic queries, a Docker image for local installations, support for multiple (metagenomic) queries and the ability to perform automated look-ups against thousands of previously PHAST-annotated bacterial genomes. PHASTEST is available online at https://phastest.ca.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cd-hit: Accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data
Fu, L., Niu, B., Zhu, Z., Wu, S., & Li, W. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 · Cited by 11,175
Cited by
Humolli, D., Piel, D., Maffei, E., Heyer, Y., Agustoni, E., Shaidullina, A., Willi, L., Imwinkelried, P., Estermann, F., Cuénod, A., et al. (2025) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003063 · Cited by 36
Metaproteomics in the One Health framework for unraveling microbial effectors in microbiomes
Heyer, R., Wolf, M., Benndorf, D., Uzzau, S., Seifert, J., Grenga, L., Pabst, M., Schmitt, H., Mesuere, B., Van Den Bossche, T., et al. (2025) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-025-02119-5 · Cited by 22
Systematic, high-throughput characterization of bacteriophage gene essentiality on diverse hosts
Chen, J., Nilsen, E. D., Chitboonthavisuk, C., Corban, J. E., Yang, M., Mo, C. Y., & Raman, S. (2025) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2025.06.018 · Cited by 16
Di Pierro, F., Sagheddu, V., Galletti, S., Casaroli, A., Labrini, E., Soldi, S., Cazzaniga, M., Bertuccioli, A., Matera, M., Cavecchia, I., et al. (2026) · Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins · doi:10.1007/s12602-025-10522-5 · Cited by 5
“The PHASTEST tool (Phage Search Tool for Escherichia coli ), a freely accessible [100] and user-friendly online tool that can identify and classify prophages and other phage-related sequences in bacterial genomes, was used to detect phage sequences in the E. coli genomes [101].”
Sliti, A., Kim, R.-H., Lee, D., & Shin, J.-H. (2025) · Microbial Pathogenesis · doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2025.107405 · Cited by 5
Matta, T., Agrawal, K., Datta, P., Kumari, L., Bishnoi, M., Chopra, K., & Kondepudi, K. K. (2026) · Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins · doi:10.1007/s12602-025-10628-w · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Wishart, D. S., Han, S., Saha, S., Oler, E., Peters, H., Grant, J. R., Stothard, P., & Gautam, V.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2023-05-17
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- W1
- Pages
- W443-W450
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W4376871556
- Cited by
- 647
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 102.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
