Cited by 71Bacteriophages and microbial interactionsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesProtein Structure and Dynamics

Protein structure-informed bacteriophage genome annotation with Phold

Open access
Bouras, George, Grigson, Susanna R, Mirdita, Milot, Heinzinger, Michael, Papudeshi, Bhavya, Mallawaarachchi, Vijini, Green, Renee, Kim, Rachel Seongeun +6 more·2026·Nucleic Acids Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Bacteriophage (phage) genome annotation is essential for understanding their functional potential and suitability for use as therapeutic agents. Here, we introduce Phold, an annotation framework utilizing protein structural information that combines the ProstT5 protein language model and structural alignment tool Foldseek. Phold assigns annotations using a database of over 1.36 million predicted phage protein structures with high-quality functional labels. Benchmarking reveals that Phold outperforms existing sequence-based homology approaches in functional annotation sensitivity whilst maintaining speed, consistency, and scalability. Applying Phold to diverse cultured and metagenomic phage genomes shows it consistently annotates over 50% of genes on an average phage and 40% on an average archaeal virus. Comparisons of phage protein structures to other protein structures across the tree of life reveal that phage proteins commonly have structural homology to proteins shared across the tree of life, particularly those that have nucleic acid metabolism and enzymatic functions. Phold is available as free and open-source software at https://github.com/gbouras13/phold.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkaf1448

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Bouras, G., Grigson, S. R., Mirdita, M., Heinzinger, M., Papudeshi, B., Mallawaarachchi, V., Green, R., Kim, R. S., Mihalia, V., Psaltis, A. J., Wormald, P.-J., Vreugde, S., Steinegger, M., & Edwards, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Central Adelaide Local Health Network (AU)
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Helmholtz Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Bouras, George
  • Edwards, Robert A
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2026-01-05
Volume
54
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W7118953414
Cited by
71
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 8
FWCI
37.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • National Research Foundation
  • Seoul National University
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (RS-2021-NR061659, 2020M3‐A9G7‐103933, RS-2024-00396026, RS-2023-00250470, RS-2021-NR056571)
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF24SA0092560)
  • Samsung
  • Australian Research Council (FL250100019, DP250103825)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
protein structural homology, Foldseek, functional annotation, archaeal viruses, structural alignment, phage therapy
MeSH terms
Bacteriophages, Software, Viral Proteins, Genome, Viral, Molecular Sequence Annotation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review