Cited by 4Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMachine Learning in BioinformaticsMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

Deciphering enzymatic potential in metagenomic reads through DNA language models

Open access
Prabakaran, R, Bromberg, Yana·2025·Nucleic Acids Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Microbial communities drive essential global processes, yet much of their functional potential remains unexplored. Metagenomics stands to elucidate this microbial “dark matter” by directly sequencing the microbial community DNA from environmental samples. However, the exploration of metagenomic sequences is mostly limited to establishing their similarity to curated reference sequences. A paradigm shift—language model (LM)-based methods—offers promising avenues for reference-free analysis of metagenomic reads. Here, we introduce two LMs, a pretrained foundation model REMME (Read EMbedder for Metagenomic Exploration), aimed at understanding the DNA context of metagenomic reads, and the fine-tuned REBEAN (Read Embedding-Based Enzyme ANnotator) for predicting the enzymatic potential encoded within the read-corresponding genes. By emphasizing function recognition over gene identification, REBEAN labels gene-encoded molecular functions of previously explored and new (orphan) sequences. Even though it was not trained to do so, REBEAN identifies the gene’s function-relevant parts. It thus expands enzymatic annotation of unassembled metagenomic reads. Here, we present novel enzymes discovered using our models, highlighting model impact on our understanding of microbial communities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkaf836

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Prabakaran, R., & Bromberg, Y.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Prabakaran, R
  • Bromberg, Yana
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2025-08-27
Volume
53
Issue
16
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W4414003224
Cited by
4
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • NASA Astrobiology Institute (80NSSC18M0093)
  • National Science Foundation (2310114)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
metagenomics, DNA language models, enzyme annotation, gene function prediction, microbial dark matter, enzyme discovery, functional metagenomics
MeSH terms
Enzymes, Software, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Metagenome, Metagenomics, Molecular Sequence Annotation, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review