Deciphering enzymatic potential in metagenomic reads through DNA language models
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Microbial communities drive essential global processes, yet much of their functional potential remains unexplored. Metagenomics stands to elucidate this microbial “dark matter” by directly sequencing the microbial community DNA from environmental samples. However, the exploration of metagenomic sequences is mostly limited to establishing their similarity to curated reference sequences. A paradigm shift—language model (LM)-based methods—offers promising avenues for reference-free analysis of metagenomic reads. Here, we introduce two LMs, a pretrained foundation model REMME (Read EMbedder for Metagenomic Exploration), aimed at understanding the DNA context of metagenomic reads, and the fine-tuned REBEAN (Read Embedding-Based Enzyme ANnotator) for predicting the enzymatic potential encoded within the read-corresponding genes. By emphasizing function recognition over gene identification, REBEAN labels gene-encoded molecular functions of previously explored and new (orphan) sequences. Even though it was not trained to do so, REBEAN identifies the gene’s function-relevant parts. It thus expands enzymatic annotation of unassembled metagenomic reads. Here, we present novel enzymes discovered using our models, highlighting model impact on our understanding of microbial communities.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,523 · see citing works
Fast and accurate protein structure search with Foldseek
van Kempen, M., Kim, S. S., Tumescheit, C., Mirdita, M., Lee, J., Gilchrist, C. L. M., Söding, J., & Steinegger, M. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01773-0 · Cited by 2,596 · see citing works
Large language models generate functional protein sequences across diverse families
Madani, A., Krause, B., Greene, E. R., Subramanian, S., Mohr, B. P., Holton, J. M., Olmos, J. L., Xiong, C., Sun, Z. Z., Socher, R., et al. (2023) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01618-2 · Cited by 1,078 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We note that much of the recent emphasis in the protein and nucleotide work with dLMs has focused on creating novel sequences that perform desired functions [ 32 , 33 ].”
DNA Polymerases: Structural Diversity and Common Mechanisms
Steitz, T. A. (1999) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.274.25.17395 · Cited by 848 · see citing works
Current challenges and best-practice protocols for microbiome analysis
Bharti, R., & Grimm, D. G. (2021) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbz155 · Cited by 592 · see citing works
Sequence modeling and design from molecular to genome scale with Evo
Nguyen, E., Poli, M., Durrant, M. G., Kang, B., Katrekar, D., Li, D. B., Bartie, L. J., Thomas, A. W., King, S. H., Brixi, G., et al. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ado9336 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
Using deep learning to annotate the protein universe
Bileschi, M. L., Belanger, D., Bryant, D. H., Sanderson, T., Carter, B., Sculley, D., Bateman, A., DePristo, M. A., & Colwell, L. J. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-01179-w · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Prabakaran, R., & Bromberg, Y.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Prabakaran, R
- Bromberg, Yana
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2025-08-27
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 16
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- PMC
- PMC12407101
- OpenAlex
- W4414003224
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- NASA Astrobiology Institute (80NSSC18M0093)
- National Science Foundation (2310114)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
- Keywords
- metagenomics, DNA language models, enzyme annotation, gene function prediction, microbial dark matter, enzyme discovery, functional metagenomics
- MeSH terms
- Enzymes, Software, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Metagenome, Metagenomics, Molecular Sequence Annotation, Microbiota
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review