CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 975

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gene identification in novel eukaryotic genomes by self-training algorithm

Lomsadze, A.·2005·Nucleic Acids Research
DOI 10.1093/nar/gki937PMC PMC1298918
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gki937

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. [1]Burge C. Karlin S. Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA J. Mol. Biol. 1997 268 78 94 9149143
  2. [2]Krogh A. Two methods for improving performance of an HMM and their application for gene finding Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol. 1997 5 179 186 9322033
  3. [3]Parra G. Blanco E. Guigo R. GeneID in Drosophila Genome Res. 2000 10 511 515 10779490 PMC310871
  4. [4]Reese M.G. Kulp D. Tammana H. Haussler D. Genie—gene finding in Drosophila melanogaster Genome Res. 2000 10 529 538 10779493 PMC310881
  5. [5]Stanke M. Waack S. Gene prediction with a hidden Markov model and a new intron submodel Bioinformatics 2003 19 II215 II225 14534192
  6. [6]Korf I. Gene finding in novel genomes BMC Bioinformatics 2004 5 59 15144565 PMC421630
  7. [7]Gish W. States D.J. Identification of protein coding regions by database similarity search Nature Genet. 1993 3 266 272 8485583
  8. [8]Gelfand M.S. Mironov A.A. Pevzner P.A. Gene recognition via spliced sequence alignment Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1996 93 9061 9066 8799154 PMC38595
  9. [9]Rogozin I.B. Milanesi L. Kolchanov N.A. Gene structure prediction using information on homologous protein sequence Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1996 12 161 170 8872383
  10. [10]Kulp D. Haussler D. Reese M.G. Eeckman F.H. Integrating database homology in a probabilistic gene structure model Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 1997 232 244 9390295
  11. [11]Laub M. Smith D. Finding intron/exon splice junctions using INFO, INterruption Finder and Organizer J. Comput. Biol. 1998 5 307 321 9672834
  12. [12]Florea L. Hartzell G. Zhang Z. Rubin G.M. Miller W. A computer program for aligning a cDNA sequence with a genomic DNA sequence Genome Res. 1998 8 967 974 9750195 PMC310774
  13. [13]Pachter L. Batzoglou S. Spitkovsky V.I. Banks E. Lander E.S. Kleitman D.J. Berger B. A dictionary-based approach for gene annotation J. Comput. Biol. 1999 6 419 430 10582576
  14. [14]Mironov A.A. Roytberg M.A. Pevzner P.A. Gelfand M.S. Performance-guarantee gene predictions via spliced alignment Genomics 1998 51 332 339 9721203
  15. [16]Pachter L. Alexandersson M. Cawley S. Applications of generalized pair hidden Markov models to alignment and gene finding problems J. Comput. Biol. 2002 9 389 399 12015888
  16. [17]Schlueter S.D. Dong Q. Brendel V. GeneSeqer@PlantGDB: gene structure prediction in plant genomes Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 31 3597 3600 12824374 PMC168940
  17. [18]Meyer I. Durbin R. Comparative ab initio prediction of gene structures using pair HMMs Bioinformatics 2002 18 1309 1318 12376375
  18. [19]Kent W.J. Zahler A.M. Conservation, regulation, synteny, and introns in a large-scale C.briggsae–C.elegans genomic alignment Genome Res. 2000 10 1115 1125 10958630
  19. [20]Batzoglou S. Pachter L. Mesirov J.P. Berger B. Lander E.S. Human and mouse gene structure: comparative analysis and application to exon prediction Genome Res. 2000 10 950 958 10899144 PMC310911
  20. [21]Morgenstern B. Rinner O. Abdeddaim S. Haase D. Mayer K.F. Dress A.W. Mewes H.W. Exon discovery by genomic sequence alignment Bioinformatics 2002 18 777 787 12075013
  21. [22]Mathe C. Sagot M.F. Schiex T. Rouze P. Current methods of gene prediction, their strengths and weaknesses Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 30 4103 4117 12364589 PMC140543
  22. [24]Baldi P. On the convergence of a clustering algorithm for protein-coding regions in microbial genomes Bioinformatics 2000 16 367 371 10869034
  23. [25]Besemer J. Lomsadze A. Borodovsky M. GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 29 2607 2618 11410670 PMC55746
  24. [26]Larsen T.S. Krogh A. EasyGene—a prokaryotic gene finder that ranks ORFs by statistical significance BMC Bioinformatics 2003 4 21 12783628 PMC521197
  25. [27]Frishman D. Mironov A. Mewes H.W. Gelfand M. Combining diverse evidence for gene recognition in completely sequenced bacterial genomes Nucleic Acids Res. 1998 26 2941 2947 9611239 PMC147632
  26. [28]Audic S. Claverie J.M. Self-identification of protein-coding regions in microbial genomes Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1998 95 10026 10031 9707594 PMC21455
  27. [29]Hayes W.S. Borodovsky M. How to interpret an anonymous bacterial genome: machine learning approach to gene identification Genome Res. 1998 8 1154 1171 9847079
  28. [30]Pavy N. Rombauts S. Dehais P. Mathe C. Ramana D.V. Leroy P. Rouze P. Evaluation of gene prediction software using a genomic data set: application to Arabidopsis thaliana sequences Bioinformatics 1999 15 887 899 10743555
  29. [31]Lukashin A.V. Borodovsky M. GeneMark.hmm: new solutions for gene finding Nucleic Acids Res. 1998 26 1107 1115 9461475 PMC147337
  30. [32]Initiative T.A.G. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana Nature 2000 408 796 815 11130711
  31. [33]Yu J. Hu S. Wang J. Wong G.K. Li S. Liu B. Deng Y. Dai L. Zhou Y. Zhang X. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica) Science 2002 296 79 92 11935017
  32. [34]Rabiner L.R. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition Proc. IEEE 1989 77 257 286
  33. [35]Staden R. Computer methods to locate signals in nucleic acid sequences Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 12 505 519 6364039 PMC321067
  34. [36]Zhang M.Q. Marr T.G. A weight array method for splicing signal analysis Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1993 9 499 509 8293321
  35. [37]Borodovsky M.Y. Sprizhitskii Y.A. Golovanov E.I. Aleksandrov A.A. Statistical patterns in primary structures of functional regions in E.coli genome: III. Computer recognition of coding regions Mol. Biol. 1986 20 1145 1150 3534549
  36. [40]Besemer J. Borodovsky M. Heuristic approach to deriving models for gene finding Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 27 3911 3920 10481031 PMC148655
  37. [42]Burset M. Guigo R. Evaluation of gene structure prediction programs Genomics 1996 34 353 367 8786136

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lomsadze, A.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2005-11-27
Volume
33
Issue
20
Pages
6494-6506
ISSN
  • 0305-1048
  • 1362-4962
DOI
10.1093/nar/gki937
PMC
PMC1298918
Cited by
975
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review