The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The CGView Server: a comparative genomics tool for circular genomes
Open accessAbstract
The CGView Server generates graphical maps of circular genomes that show sequence features, base composition plots, analysis results and sequence similarity plots. Sequences can be supplied in raw, FASTA, GenBank or EMBL format. Additional feature or analysis information can be submitted in the form of GFF (General Feature Format) files. The server uses BLAST to compare the primary sequence to up to three comparison genomes or sequence sets. The BLAST results and feature information are converted to a graphical map showing the entire sequence, or an expanded and more detailed view of a region of interest. Several options are included to control which types of features are displayed and how the features are drawn. The CGView Server can be used to visualize features associated with any bacterial, plasmid, chloroplast or mitochondrial genome, and can aid in the identification of conserved genome segments, instances of horizontal gene transfer, and differences in gene copy number. Because a collection of sequences can be used in place of a comparison genome, maps can also be used to visualize regions of a known genome covered by newly obtained sequence reads. The CGView Server can be accessed at http://stothard.afns.ualberta.ca/cgview_server/
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Analysis of Fusobacterium persistence and antibiotic response in colorectal cancer
Bullman, S., Pedamallu, C. S., Sicinska, E., Clancy, T. E., Zhang, X., Cai, D., Neuberg, D., Huang, K., Guevara, F., Nelson, T., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aal5240 · Cited by 1,574
Visual comparison for information visualization
Gleicher, M., Albers, D., Walker, R., Jusufi, I., Hansen, C. D., & Roberts, J. C. (2011) · Information Visualization · doi:10.1177/1473871611416549 · Cited by 567
Włodarczyk, A., Selão, T. T., Norling, B., & Nixon, P. J. (2020) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-020-0910-8 · Cited by 192
Kandasamy, S., Yoo, J., Yun, J., Lee, K.-H., Kang, H.-B., Kim, J.-E., Oh, M.-H., & Ham, J.-S. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms232214494 · Cited by 51
Let, M., Majhi, K., Halder, U., De, A., Saha, D., Chitikineni, A., Roychowdhury, T., Varshney, R. K., & Bandopadhyay, R. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2023.109791 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Grant, J. R., & Stothard, P.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-05-19
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- Web Server
- Pages
- W181-W184
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2127096898
- Cited by
- 1,477
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The CGView Server: a comparative genomics tool for circular genomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkn179
- The paper
- Grant, J. R., & Stothard, P. (2008). The CGView Server: a comparative genomics tool for circular genomes. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn179
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.