The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fine-grained annotation and classification of de novo predicted LTR retrotransposons
Open accessAbstract
Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons and endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) are transposable elements in eukaryotic genomes well suited for computational identification. De novo identification tools determine the position of potential LTR retrotransposon or ERV insertions in genomic sequences. For further analysis, it is desirable to obtain an annotation of the internal structure of such candidates. This article presents LTRdigest, a novel software tool for automated annotation of internal features of putative LTR retrotransposons. It uses local alignment and hidden Markov model-based algorithms to detect retrotransposon-associated protein domains as well as primer binding sites and polypurine tracts. As an example, we used LTRdigest results to identify 88 (near) full-length ERVs in the chromosome 4 sequence of Mus musculus, separating them from truncated insertions and other repeats. Furthermore, we propose a work flow for the use of LTRdigest in de novo LTR retrotransposon classification and perform an exemplary de novo analysis on the Drosophila melanogaster genome as a proof of concept. Using a new method solely based on the annotations generated by LTRdigest, 518 potential LTR retrotransposons were automatically assigned to 62 candidate groups. Representative sequences from 41 of these 62 groups were matched to reference sequences with >80% global sequence similarity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Transposable elements and the epigenetic regulation of the genome
Slotkin, R. K., & Martienssen, R. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2072 · Cited by 2,044
tRNAs as primer of reverse transcriptases
Marquet, R., Isel, C., Ehresmann, C., & Ehresmann, B. (1995) · Biochimie · doi:10.1016/0300-9084(96)88114-4 · Cited by 232
Cited by
Improved maize reference genome with single-molecule technologies
Jiao, Y., Peluso, P., Shi, J., Liang, T., Stitzer, M. C., Wang, B., Campbell, M. S., Stein, J. C., Wei, X., Chin, C.-S., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature22971 · Cited by 1,210
An improved genome assembly uncovers prolific tandem repeats in Atlantic cod
Tørresen, O. K., Star, B., Jentoft, S., Reinar, W. B., Grove, H., Miller, J. R., Walenz, B. P., Knight, J., Ekholm, J. M., Peluso, P., et al. (2017) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-016-3448-x · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Steinbiss, S., Willhoeft, U., Gremme, G., & Kurtz, S.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-09-28
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 7002-7013
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2169859562
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fine-grained annotation and classification of de novo predicted LTR retrotransposons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkp759
- The paper
- Steinbiss, S., Willhoeft, U., Gremme, G., & Kurtz, S. (2009). Fine-grained annotation and classification of de novo predicted LTR retrotransposons. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp759
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.