The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pseudomonas Genome Database: improved comparative analysis and population genomics capability for Pseudomonas genomes
Open accessAbstract
Pseudomonas is a metabolically-diverse genus of bacteria known for its flexibility and leading free living to pathogenic lifestyles in a wide range of hosts. The Pseudomonas Genome Database (http://www.pseudomonas.com) integrates completely-sequenced Pseudomonas genome sequences and their annotations with genome-scale, high-precision computational predictions and manually curated annotation updates. The latest release implements an ability to view sequence polymorphisms in P. aeruginosa PAO1 versus other reference strains, incomplete genomes and single gene sequences. This aids analysis of phenotypic variation between closely related isolates and strains, as well as wider population genomics and evolutionary studies. The wide range of tools for comparing Pseudomonas annotations and sequences now includes a strain-specific access point for viewing high precision computational predictions including updated, more accurate, protein subcellular localization and genomic island predictions. Views link to genome-scale experimental data as well as comparative genomics analyses that incorporate robust genera-geared methods for predicting and clustering orthologs. These analyses can be exploited for identifying putative essential and core Pseudomonas genes or identifying large-scale evolutionary events. The Pseudomonas Genome Database aims to provide a continually updated, high quality source of genome annotations, specifically tailored for Pseudomonas researchers, but using an approach that may be implemented for other genera-level research communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes
Kurtz, S., Phillippy, A., Delcher, A. L., Smoot, M., Shumway, M., Antonescu, C., & Salzberg, S. L. (2004) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12 · Cited by 5,254
Cited by
Winsor, G. L., Griffiths, E. J., Lo, R., Dhillon, B. K., Shay, J. A., & Brinkman, F. S. L. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1227 · Cited by 1,050
Self-citationBiofilm-Specific Antibiotic Resistance
Mah, T.-F. (2012) · Future Microbiology · doi:10.2217/fmb.12.76 · Cited by 504
Essential genome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis sputum
Turner, K. H., Wessel, A. K., Palmer, G. C., Murray, J. L., & Whiteley, M. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1419677112 · Cited by 432
The revisited genome of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 enlightens its value as a robust metabolic chassis
Belda, E., van Heck, R. G. A., José Lopez‐Sanchez, M., Cruveiller, S., Barbe, V., Fraser, C., Klenk, H., Petersen, J., Morgat, A., Nikel, P. I., et al. (2016) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.13230 · Cited by 338
Skurnik, D., Roux, D., Aschard, H., Cattoir, V., Yoder-Himes, D., Lory, S., & Pier, G. B. (2013) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1003582 · Cited by 184
Metadata
- Authors
- Winsor, G. L., Lam, D. K. W., Fleming, L., Lo, R., Whiteside, M. D., Yu, N. Y., Hancock, R. E. W., & Brinkman, F. S. L.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-10-06
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- Database
- Pages
- D596-D600
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2170382524
- Cited by
- 604
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pseudomonas Genome Database: improved comparative analysis and population genomics capability for Pseudomonas genomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkq869
- The paper
- Winsor, G. L., Lam, D. K. W., Fleming, L., Lo, R., Whiteside, M. D., Yu, N. Y., Hancock, R. E. W., & Brinkman, F. S. L. (2011). Pseudomonas Genome Database: improved comparative analysis and population genomics capability for Pseudomonas genomes. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq869
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.