CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 52

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

RNA degradome--its biogenesis and functions

Jackowiak, P., Nowacka, M., Strozycki, P. M., Figlerowicz, M.·2011·Nucleic Acids Research
DOI 10.1093/nar/gkr450PMC PMC3177198
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkr450

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. The RNA life cycle—from transcription to degradation. The primary transcript is processed to yield mature RNA. Processing (solid lines) usually involves several steps, including precursor cleavage. Surveillance systems provide quality control for all steps of RNA maturation. During maturation, certain RNA fragments are discarded and ultimately degraded (dashed lines) to nucleoside monophosphates (NMPs). Aberrant, dysfunctional molecules are also rapidly digested to nucleoside monophosphates (some enzymes, however, can generate alternative products, e.g. nucleoside diphosphates). Different classes of mature functional RNA display various levels of stability, but all functional RNA molecules eventually undergo turnover. Turnover-associated degradation can be very rapid and can yield no stable intermediates. Alternatively, stable intermediates of RNA degradation can form and accumulate in cells. It seems that at least some of these intermediates can operate as regulatory or signaling molecules. The scheme contains the names of previously described classes of RNA, and question marks indicate potential, undiscovered classes. Components of the RNA degradome are also indicated as defined in the text. Immature RNA is represented in black, mature RNA in green, degradation products in blue.
Figure 1. The RNA life cycle—from transcription to degradation. The primary transcript is processed to yield mature RNA. Processing (solid lines) usually involves several steps, including precursor cleavage. Surveillance systems provide quality control for all steps of RNA maturation. During maturation, certain RNA fragments are discarded and ultimately degraded (dashed lines) to nucleoside monophosphates (NMPs). Aberrant, dysfunctional molecules are also rapidly digested to nucleoside monophosphates (some enzymes, however, can generate alternative products, e.g. nucleoside diphosphates). Different classes of mature functional RNA display various levels of stability, but all functional RNA molecules eventually undergo turnover. Turnover-associated degradation can be very rapid and can yield no stable intermediates. Alternatively, stable intermediates of RNA degradation can form and accumulate in cells. It seems that at least some of these intermediates can operate as regulatory or signaling molecules. The scheme contains the names of previously described classes of RNA, and question marks indicate potential, undiscovered classes. Components of the RNA degradome are also indicated as defined in the text. Immature RNA is represented in black, mature RNA in green, degradation products in blue.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 81

  1. Kapranov, 2007, Nature reviews. Genetics, 8, 413, 10.1038/nrg2083 · DOI
  2. 2007, Nature; Physical Science (London), 447, 799, 10.1038/nature05874 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 2006, 173, 45, 10.1007/3-540-27262-3_3 · DOI
  4. Rymarquis, 2008, Trends in plant science, 13, 329, 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.02.009 · DOI
  5. Mattick, 2001, EMBO Reports, 2, 986, 10.1093/embo-reports/kve230 · DOI
  6. Waters, 2009, Cell, 136, 615, 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.043 · DOI
  7. Dennis, 2005, Current opinion in microbiology, 8, 685, 10.1016/j.mib.2005.10.013 · DOI
  8. Mattick, 2009, 5, e1000459, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000459 · DOI
  9. Mattick, 2006, Human Molecular Genetics, 15, R17, 10.1093/hmg/ddl046 · DOI
  10. 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 280, 42744, 10.1074/jbc.M510356200 · DOI
  11. 2008, RNA, 14, 2095, 10.1261/rna.1232808 · DOI
  12. Lee, 2009, Genes & Development, 23, 2639, 10.1101/gad.1837609 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 2008, Nucleic Acids Research, 36, 2677, 10.1093/nar/gkn123 · DOI
  14. 2010, RNA, 16, 673, 10.1261/rna.2000810 · DOI
  15. 2009, Plant Physiology, 150, 378, 10.1104/pp.108.134767 · DOI
  16. 2009, RNA, 15, 1233, 10.1261/rna.1528909 · DOI
  17. Ender, 2008, Molecular cell, 32, 519, 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.10.017 · DOI
  18. Kawaji, 2008, BMC genomics [electronic resource], 9, 157, 10.1186/1471-2164-9-157 · DOI
  19. Houseley, 2009, Cell, 136, 763, 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.019 · DOI
  20. Deutscher, 2006, Nucleic Acids Research, 34, 659, 10.1093/nar/gkj472 · DOI
  21. 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 278, 45041, 10.1074/jbc.R300031200 · DOI
  22. Condon, 2007, Current opinion in microbiology, 10, 271, 10.1016/j.mib.2007.05.008 · DOI
  23. Nicholson, 1999, FEMS microbiology reviews, 23, 371, 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1999.tb00405.x · DOI
  24. Houseley, 2006, Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 7, 529, 10.1038/nrm1964 · DOI
  25. Condon, 2008, Methods in enzymology, 447, 277, 10.1016/S0076-6879(08)02215-5 · DOI
  26. Olmedo, 2008, Molecular microbiology, 68, 1073, 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06203.x · DOI
  27. Henras, 2008, Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 65, 2334, 10.1007/s00018-008-8027-0 · DOI
  28. Phizicky, 2010, Genes & Development, 24, 1832, 10.1101/gad.1956510 · DOI
  29. Reinhold-Hurek, 1992, Nature; Physical Science (London), 357, 173, 10.1038/357173a0 · DOI
  30. 2010, RNA, 16, 259, 10.1261/rna.1907510 · DOI
  31. Bartel, 2004, Cell, 116, 281, 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5 · DOI
  32. Wilusz, 2008, Cell, 135, 919, 10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.012 · DOI
  33. Cole, 2009, Molecular cell, 34, 440, 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.04.017 · DOI
  34. Mitchell, 2003, Molecular cell, 11, 1405, 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00190-4 · DOI
  35. Frischmeyer, 2002, Science, 295, 2258, 10.1126/science.1067338 · DOI
  36. van Hoof, 2002, Science, 295, 2262, 10.1126/science.1067272 · DOI
  37. Schoenberg, 2007, 3, 535, 10.1038/nchembio0907-535 · DOI
  38. Jain, 2002, IUBMB life, 54, 315, 10.1080/15216540216036 · DOI
  39. Kushner, 2002, Journal of Bacteriology, 184, 4658, 10.1128/JB.184.17.4658-4665.2002 · DOI
  40. Anderson, 2009, 2009, 525491, 10.1155/2009/525491 · DOI
  41. Lebreton, 2008, Nature; Physical Science (London), 456, 993, 10.1038/nature07480 · DOI
  42. Schaeffer, 2009, Nature structural & molecular biology, 16, 56, 10.1038/nsmb.1528 · DOI
  43. 2009, Nucleic Acids Research, 37, 1127, 10.1093/nar/gkn1020 · DOI
  44. Hsu, 1993, Molecular and Cellular Biology, 13, 4826, 10.1128/MCB.13.8.4826 · DOI
  45. 2008, Nucleic Acids Research, 36, 2874, 10.1093/nar/gkm1100 · DOI
  46. 2008, Nucleic Acids Research, 36, 6048, 10.1093/nar/gkn596 · DOI
  47. 2008, Nucleic Acids Research, 36, 732, 10.1093/nar/gkm1096 · DOI
  48. Liang, 2006, IUBMB life, 58, 508, 10.1080/15216540600838232 · DOI
  49. Addo-Quaye, 2008, Current biology : CB, 18, 758, 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.042 · DOI
  50. 2010, Journal of Experimental Botany, 61, 3833, 10.1093/jxb/erq209 · DOI
  51. Pantaleo, 2010, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 62, 960
  52. 2010, Frontiers of Biology, 5, 67, 10.1007/s11515-010-0007-8 · DOI
  53. 2009, RNA, 15, 2112, 10.1261/rna.1774909 · DOI
  54. 2009, Bioinformatics, 25, 130, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn604 · DOI
  55. German, 2009, 4, 356, 10.1038/nprot.2009.8 · DOI
  56. Karginov, 2010, Molecular cell, 38, 781, 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.06.001 · DOI
  57. 2010, Genome Research, 20, 1639, 10.1101/gr.112128.110 · DOI
  58. The FANTOM Consortium, 2005, Science, 309, 1559, 10.1126/science.1112014 · DOI
  59. 2011, Nucleic Acids Research, 39, 2393, 10.1093/nar/gkq1158 · DOI
  60. 2009, RNA, 15, 2147, 10.1261/rna.1738409 · DOI
  61. 2010, 5, 537, 10.4161/psb.11029 · DOI
  62. Babiarz, 2008, Genes & Development, 22, 2773, 10.1101/gad.1705308 · DOI
  63. 2010, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 285, 10959, 10.1074/jbc.M109.077560 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Garcia-Silva, 2010, Molecular and biochemical parasitology, 171, 64, 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2010.02.003 · DOI
  65. Kawamura, 2008, Nature; Physical Science (London), 453, 793, 10.1038/nature06938 · DOI
  66. 2009, The Journal of Cell Biology, 185, 35, 10.1083/jcb.200811106 · DOI
  67. Fu, 2009, FEBS Letters, 583, 437, 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.12.043 · DOI
  68. Borek, 1977, Cancer Research, 37, 3362
  69. 1979, 44, 2120, 10.1002/1097-0142(197912)44:6<2120::AID-CNCR2820440623>3.0.CO;2-6 · DOI
  70. Elbarbary, 2009, 4, e5908, 10.1371/journal.pone.0005908 · DOI
  71. 2010, RNA, 16, 1865, 10.1261/rna.2266510 · DOI
  72. 2004, 342, 25
  73. Mattick, 2005, Human Molecular Genetics, 14, R121, 10.1093/hmg/ddi101 · DOI
  74. Levitz, 1990, The EMBO Journal, 9, 1383, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08253.x · DOI
  75. 2000, PNAS, 97, 8278, 10.1073/pnas.140213797 · DOI
  76. Ogawa, 1999, Science, 283, 2097, 10.1126/science.283.5410.2097 · DOI
  77. 2009, The Journal of Cell Biology, 185, 43, 10.1083/jcb.200811119 · DOI
  78. Li, 2009, Science in China. Series C, Life sciences / Chinese Academy of Sciences, 52, 245, 10.1007/s11427-009-0039-y · DOI
  79. 2006, Science, 313, 363, 10.1126/science.1130164 · DOI
  80. Buchan, 2009, Molecular cell, 36, 932, 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.11.020 · DOI
  81. Jenny, 2006, Development, 133, 2827, 10.1242/dev.02456 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 52

Metadata

Authors
Jackowiak, P., Nowacka, M., Strozycki, P. M., & Figlerowicz, M.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2011-06-07
Volume
39
Issue
17
Pages
7361-7370
ISSN
  • 0305-1048
  • 1362-4962
DOI
10.1093/nar/gkr450
PMC
PMC3177198
Cited by
52
References
1
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 (vor, 1980 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review