The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
i-ADHoRe 3.0—fast and sensitive detection of genomic homology in extremely large data sets
Open accessAbstract
Comparative genomics is a powerful means to gain insight into the evolutionary processes that shape the genomes of related species. As the number of sequenced genomes increases, the development of software to perform accurate cross-species analyses becomes indispensable. However, many implementations that have the ability to compare multiple genomes exhibit unfavorable computational and memory requirements, limiting the number of genomes that can be analyzed in one run. Here, we present a software package to unveil genomic homology based on the identification of conservation of gene content and gene order (collinearity), i-ADHoRe 3.0, and its application to eukaryotic genomes. The use of efficient algorithms and support for parallel computing enable the analysis of large-scale data sets. Unlike other tools, i-ADHoRe can process the Ensembl data set, containing 49 species, in 1 h. Furthermore, the profile search is more sensitive to detect degenerate genomic homology than chaining pairwise collinearity information based on transitive homology. From ultra-conserved collinear regions between mammals and birds, by integrating coexpression information and protein-protein interactions, we identified more than 400 regions in the human genome showing significant functional coherence. The different algorithmical improvements ensure that i-ADHoRe 3.0 will remain a powerful tool to study genome evolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing.
The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09534 · Cited by 7,877
Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome
Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01262 · Cited by 7,187
Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry
Bentley, D. R., Balasubramanian, S., Swerdlow, H. P., Smith, G. P., Milton, J., Brown, C. G., Hall, K. P., Evers, D. J., Barnes, C. L., Bignell, H. R., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07517 · Cited by 3,684
International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03154 · Cited by 2,750
Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome
The Chimpanzee Sequencing and Analysis Consortium (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04072 · Cited by 2,459
Jaillon, O., Aury, J.-M., Brunet, F., Petit, J.-L., Stange-Thomann, N., Mauceli, E., Bouneau, L., Fischer, C., Ozouf-Costaz, C., Bernot, A., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03025 · Cited by 1,966
Dujon, B., Sherman, D., Fischer, G., Durrens, P., Casaregola, S., Lafontaine, I., de Montigny, J., Marck, C., Neuvéglise, C., Talla, E., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02579 · Cited by 1,623
The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications
Van de Peer, Y., Maere, S., & Meyer, A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2600 · Cited by 1,129
A Recent Polyploidy Superimposed on Older Large-Scale Duplications in the Arabidopsis Genome
Blanc, G., Hokamp, K., & Wolfe, K. H. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.751803 · Cited by 724
The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2010
Aranda, B., Achuthan, P., Alam-Faruque, Y., Armean, I., Bridge, A., Derow, C., Feuermann, M., Ghanbarian, A. T., Kerrien, S., Khadake, J., et al. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp878 · Cited by 620
Cited by
The transcriptional landscape of polyploid wheat
Ramírez-González, R. H., Borrill, P., Lang, D., Harrington, S. A., Brinton, J., Venturini, L., Davey, M., Jacobs, J., van Ex, F., Pasha, A., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar6089 · Cited by 1,018
PGDD: a database of gene and genome duplication in plants
Lee, T.-H., Tang, H., Wang, X., & Paterson, A. H. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks1104 · Cited by 593
The water lily genome and the early evolution of flowering plants
Zhang, L., Chen, F., Zhang, X., Li, Z., Zhao, Y., Lohaus, R., Chang, X., Dong, W., Ho, S. Y. W., Liu, X., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1852-5 · Cited by 429
Self-citationThe Physcomitrella patens chromosome‐scale assembly reveals moss genome structure and evolution
Lang, D., Ullrich, K. K., Murat, F., Fuchs, J., Jenkins, J., Haas, F. B., Piednoel, M., Gundlach, H., Van Bel, M., Meyberg, R., et al. (2018) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.13801 · Cited by 423
Self-citationA draft genome sequence of the pulse crop chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
Jain, M., Misra, G., Patel, R. K., Priya, P., Jhanwar, S., Khan, A. W., Shah, N., Singh, V. K., Garg, R., Jeena, G., et al. (2013) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.12173 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Proost, S., Fostier, J., De Witte, D., Dhoedt, B., Demeester, P., Van de Peer, Y., & Vandepoele, K.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-11-17
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e11-e11
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2002833133
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: i-ADHoRe 3.0—fast and sensitive detection of genomic homology in extremely large data sets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkr955
- The paper
- Proost, S., Fostier, J., De Witte, D., Dhoedt, B., Demeester, P., Van de Peer, Y., & Vandepoele, K. (2012). i-ADHoRe 3.0—fast and sensitive detection of genomic homology in extremely large data sets. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr955
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
