The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inferring direct DNA binding from ChIP-seq
Open accessAbstract
Genome-wide binding data from transcription factor ChIP-seq experiments is the best source of information for inferring the relative DNA-binding affinity of these proteins in vivo. However, standard motif enrichment analysis and motif discovery approaches sometimes fail to correctly identify the binding motif for the ChIP-ed factor. To overcome this problem, we propose 'central motif enrichment analysis' (CMEA), which is based on the observation that the positional distribution of binding sites matching the direct-binding motif tends to be unimodal, well centered and maximal in the precise center of the ChIP-seq peak regions. We describe a novel visualization and statistical analysis tool--CentriMo--that identifies the region of maximum central enrichment in a set of ChIP-seq peak regions and displays the positional distributions of predicted sites. Using CentriMo for motif enrichment analysis, we provide evidence that one transcription factor (Nanog) has different binding affinity in vivo than in vitro, that another binds DNA cooperatively (E2f1), and confirm the in vivo affinity of NFIC, rescuing a difficult ChIP-seq data set. In another data set, CentriMo strongly suggests that there is no evidence of direct DNA binding by the ChIP-ed factor (Smad1). CentriMo is now part of the MEME Suite software package available at http://meme.nbcr.net. All data and output files presented here are available at: http://research.imb.uq.edu.au/t.bailey/sd/Bailey2011a.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mathelier, A., Fornes, O., Arenillas, D. J., Chen, C.-Y., Denay, G., Lee, J., Shi, W., Shyr, C., Tan, G., Worsley-Hunt, R., et al. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1176 · Cited by 937
Pioneer Transcription Factors Target Partial DNA Motifs on Nucleosomes to Initiate Reprogramming
Soufi, A., Garcia, M. F., Jaroszewicz, A., Osman, N., Pellegrini, M., & Zaret, K. S. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.017 · Cited by 780
Base-resolution models of transcription-factor binding reveal soft motif syntax
Avsec, Ž., Weilert, M., Shrikumar, A., Krueger, S., Alexandari, A., Dalal, K., Fropf, R., McAnany, C., Gagneur, J., Kundaje, A., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00782-6 · Cited by 610
AP-1 Transcription Factors and the BAF Complex Mediate Signal-Dependent Enhancer Selection
Vierbuchen, T., Ling, E., Cowley, C. J., Couch, C. H., Wang, X., Harmin, D. A., Roberts, C. W. M., & Greenberg, M. E. (2017) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2017.11.026 · Cited by 455
The Role of m6A/m-RNA Methylation in Stress Response Regulation
Engel, M., Eggert, C., Kaplick, P. M., Eder, M., Röh, S., Tietze, L., Namendorf, C., Arloth, J., Weber, P., Rex-Haffner, M., et al. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.07.009 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- Bailey, T. L., & Machanick, P.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-05-18
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- e128-e128
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2124080033
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inferring direct DNA binding from ChIP-seq. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gks433
- The paper
- Bailey, T. L., & Machanick, P. (2012). Inferring direct DNA binding from ChIP-seq. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks433
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.