Base-resolution models of transcription-factor binding reveal soft motif syntax
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The arrangement (syntax) of transcription factor (TF) binding motifs is an important part of the cis-regulatory code, yet remains elusive. We introduce a deep learning model, BPNet, that uses DNA sequence to predict base-resolution chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-nexus binding profiles of pluripotency TFs. We develop interpretation tools to learn predictive motif representations and identify soft syntax rules for cooperative TF binding interactions. Strikingly, Nanog preferentially binds with helical periodicity, and TFs often cooperate in a directional manner, which we validate using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-induced point mutations. Our model represents a powerful general approach to uncover the motifs and syntax of cis-regulatory sequences in genomics data.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The BPNet architecture has been used widely in genomics and represents a very strong default architecture for modeling small-sized datasets from scratch through supervised learning.
“The BPNet architecture has been used widely in genomics and represents a very strong default architecture for modeling small-sized datasets from scratch through supervised learning.”
From Nucleotide Transformer: building and evaluating robust foundation models for human genomics (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
The BPNet architecture and training sections describe a supervised model trained on genomic data, and the Discussion calls it a general framework that outperformed the methods evaluated. The paper does not establish that BPNet was already widely used in genomics or that it is a strong default for small-sized datasets trained from scratch; its reported training is not presented as a small-dataset evaluation. The supplied passages have section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMachine-learning models trained to predict function from DNA sequences have been successful at characterizing regulatory syntax and interpreting genetic variant effects.
“Machine-learning models trained to predict function from DNA sequences have been successful at characterizing regulatory syntax and interpreting genetic variant effects.”
From Predicting RNA-seq coverage from DNA sequence as a unifying model of gene regulation (2025) · cites this paper as [7]
The Abstract and Discussion show that BPNet uses DNA sequence to characterize regulatory motif syntax and predict the effects of experimentally introduced sequence changes. But the Discussion presents pinpointing disease-associated genetic variants as a future opportunity, not an accomplished interpretation of genetic variant effects in this study. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThus far, sequence-based models have focused on assays in which measured activity is proportional to local sequencing read counts.
“Thus far, such models have focused on assays in which measured activity is proportional to local sequencing read counts.”
From Predicting RNA-seq coverage from DNA sequence as a unifying model of gene regulation (2025) · cites this paper as [7]
The Introduction (page unavailable) describes existing transcription-factor binding models as predicting binary binding events or continuous binding signals, and the Results describe ChIP-nexus profiles in terms of local read counts. This supports the claim for the transcription-factor binding models discussed, but the paper does not establish that sequence-based models generally had focused on read-count-based assays. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredFiner resolution has potential benefits when data support it, but would extend the sequence length entering the quadratic complexity MHA and make the model engineering intractable on currently available hardware.
“Finer resolution has potential benefits when the data support it15, but would extend the sequence length entering the quadratic complexity MHA and make the model engineering intractable on currently available hardware.”
From Effective gene expression prediction from sequence by integrating long-range interactions (2021) · cites this paper as [15]
A deep learning algorithm applied to binding of pluripotency transcription factors at base resolution in mouse embryonic stem cells suggested a soft motif syntax whereby transcription factors help each other to bind directly to the enhancer with a lenient distance-dependency between binding sites.
“Additionally, a deep learning algorithm applied to binding of pluripotency TFs at base resolution in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) suggested a “soft motif syntax” whereby TFs help each other to bind directly to the enhancer with a lenient distance-dependency between binding sites [98].”
From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [98]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · see citing works
VMD: visual molecular dynamics
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A., & Schulten, K. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Graphics · doi:10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 · Cited by 66,952 · see citing works
The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools
Li, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., Homer, N., Marth, G., Abecasis, G., Durbin, R., & 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · Cited by 62,041 · see citing works
Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · Cited by 58,607 · see citing works
Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads
Martin, M. (2011) · EMBnet.journal · doi:10.14806/ej.17.1.200 · Cited by 33,889 · see citing works
Kimura, M. (1980) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01731581 · Cited by 29,778 · see citing works
BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features
Quinlan, A. R., & Hall, I. M. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 · Cited by 27,437 · see citing works
Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome.
Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M., & Salzberg, S. L. (2009) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 · Cited by 21,849 · see citing works
Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function
Ward, J. H. (1963) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845 · Cited by 21,341 · see citing works
Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS)
Zhang, Y., Liu, T., Meyer, C. A., Eeckhoute, J., Johnson, D. S., Bernstein, B. E., Nusbaum, C., Myers, R. M., Brown, M., Li, W., et al. (2008) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137 · Cited by 18,386 · see citing works
An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome
The ENCODE Project Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11247 · Cited by 18,072 · see citing works
Self-citationHeinz, S., Benner, C., Spann, N., Bertolino, E., Lin, Y. C., Laslo, P., Cheng, J. X., Murre, C., Singh, H., & Glass, C. K. (2010) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.004 · Cited by 13,382 · see citing works
MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching
Bailey, T. L., Boden, M., Buske, F. A., Frith, M., Grant, C. E., Clementi, L., Ren, J., Li, W. W., & Noble, W. S. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp335 · Cited by 10,648 · see citing works
Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes
Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium, Kundaje, A., Meuleman, W., Ernst, J., Bilenky, M., Yen, A., Heravi-Moussavi, A., Kheradpour, P., Zhang, Z., Wang, J., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14248 · Cited by 6,368 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(3) Experimental control data are used as an auxiliary input (PAtCh-CAP for ChIP-nexus data59).”
Self-citationWaveNet: a generative model for raw audio
Oord, A. V. D., Dieleman, S., Zen, H., Simonyan, K., Vinyals, O., Graves, A., Kalchbrenner, N., Senior, A., & Kavukcuoglu, K. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.03499 · Cited by 4,911 · see citing works
The Homeoprotein Nanog Is Required for Maintenance of Pluripotency in Mouse Epiblast and ES Cells
Mitsui, K., Tokuzawa, Y., Itoh, H., Segawa, K., Murakami, M., Takahashi, K., Maruyama, M., Maeda, M., & Yamanaka, S. (2003) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00393-3 · Cited by 3,192 · see citing works
Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA- and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning
Alipanahi, B., Delong, A., Weirauch, M. T., & Frey, B. J. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3300 · Cited by 2,873 · see citing works
Predicting splicing from primary sequence with deep learning
Jaganathan, K., Kyriazopoulou Panagiotopoulou, S., McRae, J. F., Darbandi, S. F., Knowles, D., Li, Y. I., Kosmicki, J. A., Arbelaez, J., Cui, W., Schwartz, G. B., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.015 · Cited by 2,853 · see citing works
Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences
Shrikumar, A., Greenside, P., & Kundaje, A. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.02685 · Cited by 2,761 · see citing works
Self-citationChen, X., Han, X., Yuan, P., Fang, F., Huss, M., Vega, V. B., Wong, E., Orlov, Y. L., Zhang, W., Jiang, J., et al. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.04.043 · Cited by 2,474 · see citing works
The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells
Loh, Y., Wu, Q., Chew, J.-L., Vega, V. B., Zhang, W., Chen, X., Bourque, G., George, J., Leong, B., Liu, J., et al. (2006) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1760 · Cited by 2,438 · see citing works
Predicting effects of noncoding variants with deep learning–based sequence model
Zhou, J., & Troyanskaya, O. G. (2015) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3547 · Cited by 2,338 · see citing works
Transcription factors: from enhancer binding to developmental control
Spitz, F., & Furlong, E. E. M. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3207 · Cited by 2,227 · see citing works
TRANSFAC(R) and its module TRANSCompel(R): transcriptional gene regulation in eukaryotes
Matys, V. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkj143 · Cited by 2,179 · see citing works
ChIP-seq guidelines and practices of the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia
Landt, S. G., Marinov, G. K., Kundaje, A., Kheradpour, P., Pauli, F., Batzoglou, S., Bernstein, B. E., Bickel, P., Brown, J. B., Cayting, P., et al. (2012) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.136184.111 · Cited by 2,033 · see citing works
Self-citationJASPAR 2020: update of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles
Fornes, O., Castro-Mondragon, J. A., Khan, A., van der Lee, R., Zhang, X., Richmond, P. A., Modi, B. P., Correard, S., Gheorghe, M., Baranašić, D., et al. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz1001 · Cited by 1,763 · see citing works
Expression of a β-globin gene is enhanced by remote SV40 DNA sequences
Banerji, J., Rusconi, S., & Schaffner, W. (1981) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(81)90413-x · Cited by 1,724 · see citing works
Structure of a B-DNA dodecamer: conformation and dynamics.
Drew, H. R., Wing, R. M., Takano, T., Broka, C. A., Tanaka, S., Itakura, K., & Dickerson, R. E. (1981) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.78.4.2179 · Cited by 1,562 · see citing works
Architecture of the human regulatory network derived from ENCODE data
Gerstein, M., Kundaje, A. B., Hariharan, M., Landt, S. G., Yan, K., Cheng, C., Mu, X. J., Khurana, E., Rozowsky, J. S., Alexander, R. P., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11245 · Cited by 1,418 · see citing works
Self-citationBigWig and BigBed: enabling browsing of large distributed datasets
Kent, W. J., Zweig, A. S., Barber, G. P., Hinrichs, A. S., & Karolchik, D. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq351 · Cited by 1,268 · see citing works
DNA-Binding Specificities of Human Transcription Factors
Jolma, A., Yan, J., Whitington, T., Toivonen, J., Nitta, K. R., Rastas, P. M. A., Morgunova, E. Y., Enge, M., Taipale, M., Wei, G., et al. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.009 · Cited by 1,228 · see citing works
CCTop: An intuitive, flexible and reliable CRISPR/Cas9 target prediction tool
Stemmer, M., Thumberger, T., del Sol Keyer, M., Wittbrodt, J., & Mateo, J. L. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124633 · Cited by 1,088 · see citing works
Kelley, D. R., Snoek, J., & Rinn, J. L. (2016) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.200535.115 · Cited by 1,048 · see citing works
GtRNAdb 2.0: an expanded database of transfer RNA genes identified in complete and draft genomes
Chan, P. P., & Lowe, T. M. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1309 · Cited by 1,035 · see citing works
Virus induction of human IFNβ gene expression requires the assembly of an enhanceosome
Thanos, D., & Maniatis, T. (1995) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90136-1 · Cited by 1,014 · see citing works
Measuring reproducibility of high-throughput experiments
Li, Q., Brown, J. B., Huang, H., & Bickel, P. J. (2011) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/11-aoas466 · Cited by 1,008 · see citing works
Hughes, J. D., Estep, P. W., Tavazoie, S., & Church, G. M. (2000) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.3519 · Cited by 1,008 · see citing works
STRIDE: a web server for secondary structure assignment from known atomic coordinates of proteins
Heinig, M., & Frishman, D. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh429 · Cited by 1,003 · see citing works
Design and analysis of ChIP-seq experiments for DNA-binding proteins
Kharchenko, P., Tolstorukov, M., & Park, P. J. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1508 · Cited by 950 · see citing works
Information content of binding sites on nucleotide sequences
Schneider, T. D., Stormo, G. D., Gold, L., & Ehrenfeucht, A. (1986) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(86)90165-8 · Cited by 944 · see citing works
Measuring reproducibility of high-throughput experiments
Li, Q., Brown, J. B., Huang, H., & Bickel, P. J. (2010) · UC Berkeley · Cited by 915 · see citing works
Soufi, A., Donahue, G., & Zaret, K. S. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.045 · Cited by 887 · see citing works
Wang, J., Zhuang, J., Iyer, S., Lin, X.-Y., Whitfield, T. W., Greven, M. C., Pierce, B. G., Dong, X., Kundaje, A. B., Cheng, Y., et al. (2012) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.139105.112 · Cited by 820 · see citing works
Self-citationPioneer Transcription Factors Target Partial DNA Motifs on Nucleosomes to Initiate Reprogramming
Soufi, A., Garcia, M. F., Jaroszewicz, A., Osman, N., Pellegrini, M., & Zaret, K. S. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.017 · Cited by 780 · see citing works
Transposable elements have rewired the core regulatory network of human embryonic stem cells
Kunarso, G., Chia, N., Jeyakani, J., Hwang, C., Lu, X., Chan, Y.-S., Ng, H., & Bourque, G. (2010) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.600 · Cited by 777 · see citing works
Comprehensive Genome-wide Protein-DNA Interactions Detected at Single-Nucleotide Resolution
Rhee, H. S., & Pugh, B. F. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.013 · Cited by 760 · see citing works
Chew, J.-L., Loh, Y., Zhang, W., Chen, X., Tam, W. L., Yeap, L.-S., Li, P., Ang, Y.-S., Lim, B., Robson, P., et al. (2005) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.25.14.6031-6046.2005 · Cited by 641 · see citing works
Enhancer decommissioning by LSD1 during embryonic stem cell differentiation
Whyte, W. A., Bilodeau, S., Orlando, D. A., Hoke, H. A., Frampton, G. M., Foster, C. T., Cowley, S. M., & Young, R. A. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10805 · Cited by 602 · see citing works
Evolution of the mammalian transcription factor binding repertoire via transposable elementsPreprint
Bourque, G., Leong, B., Vega, V. B., Chen, X., Lee, Y. L., Srinivasan, K. G., Chew, J.-L., Ruan, Y., Wei, C., Ng, H., et al. (2008) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.080663.108 · Cited by 588 · see citing works
PeakSeq enables systematic scoring of ChIP-seq experiments relative to controls
Rozowsky, J. S., Euskirchen, G. M., Auerbach, R. K., Zhang, Z. D., Gibson, T., Bjornson, R. D., Carriero, N., Snyder, M. P., & Gerstein, M. (2009) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1518 · Cited by 558 · see citing works
Fast optimal leaf ordering for hierarchical clustering
Bar‐Joseph, Z., Gifford, D. K., & Jaakkola, T. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.suppl_1.s22 · Cited by 557 · see citing works
DNA-dependent formation of transcription factor pairs alters their binding specificity
Jolma, A., Yin, Y., Nitta, K. R., Dave, K., Popov, A. N., Taipale, M., Enge, M., Kivioja, T., Morgunova, E. Y., & Taipale, J. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15518 · Cited by 555 · see citing works
Absence of a simple code: how transcription factors read the genome
Slattery, M., Zhou, T., Yang, L., Dantas Machado, A. C., Gordân, R., & Rohs, R. (2014) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2014.07.002 · Cited by 537 · see citing works
Sequential regulatory activity prediction across chromosomes with convolutional neural networks
Kelley, D. R., Reshef, Y. A., Bileschi, M., Belanger, D., McLean, C. Y., & Snoek, J. (2018) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.227819.117 · Cited by 537 · see citing works
Reorganization of enhancer patterns in transition from naive to primed pluripotency
Buecker, C., Srinivasan, R., Wu, Z., Calo, E., Acampora, D., Faial, T., Simeone, A., Tan, M., Swigut, T., & Wysocka, J. (2014) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2014.04.003 · Cited by 507 · see citing works
Pavesi, G., Mereghetti, P., Mauri, G., & Pesole, G. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh465 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Convergence of Developmental and Oncogenic Signaling Pathways at Transcriptional Super-Enhancers
Hnisz, D., Schuijers, J., Lin, C. Y., Weintraub, A. S., Abraham, B. J., Lee, T. I., Bradner, J. E., & Young, R. A. (2015) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.014 · Cited by 476 · see citing works
Inferring direct DNA binding from ChIP-seq
Bailey, T. L., & Machanick, P. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks433 · Cited by 472 · see citing works
Sharon, E., Kalma, Y., Sharp, A., Raveh-Sadka, T., Levo, M., Zeevi, D., Keren, L., Yakhini, Z., Weinberger, A., & Segal, E. (2012) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2205 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
Cooperative binding of λ repressors to sites separated by integral turns of the DNA helix
Hochschild, A., & Ptashne, M. (1986) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(86)90833-0 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
Thijs, G., Lescot, M., Kathleen Marchal, D., Rombauts, S., Moor, B. D., Rouzé, P., & Moreau, Y. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1113 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Reményi, A., Lins, K., Nissen, L. J., Reinbold, R. A., Schöler, H. R., & Wilmanns, M. (2003) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.269303 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Esrrb Is a Pivotal Target of the Gsk3/Tcf3 Axis Regulating Embryonic Stem Cell Self-Renewal
Martello, G., Sugimoto, T., Diamanti, E., Joshi, A., Hannah, R., Ohtsuka, S., Göttgens, B., Niwa, H., & Smith, A. G. (2012) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2012.06.008 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Ambrosetti, D. C., Basilico, C., & Dailey, L. (1997) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.17.11.6321 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Merika, M., & Thanos, D. (2001) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/s0959-437x(00)00180-5 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
The interaction landscape between transcription factors and the nucleosome
Zhu, F., Farnung, L., Kaasinen, E., Sahu, B., Yin, Y., Wei, B., Dodonova, S., Nitta, K. R., Morgunova, E. Y., Taipale, M., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0549-5 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Suboptimization of developmental enhancers
Farley, E. K., Olson, K. M., Zhang, W., Brandt, A. J., Rokhsar, D. S., & Levine, M. S. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aac6948 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
DNA-dependent formation of transcription factor pairs alters their binding specificity
Jolma, A., Yin, Y., Nitta, K. R., Dave, K., Popov, A. N., Taipale, M., Enge, M., Kivioja, T., Morgunova, E. Y., & Taipale, J. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18912 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Botquin, V., Hess, H., Fuhrmann, G., Anastassiadis, K., Gross, M. K., Vriend, G., & Schöler, H. R. (1998) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.12.13.2073 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Kim, S., Broströmer, E., Xing, D., Jin, J., Chong, S., Ge, H., Wang, S. S., Gu, C., Yang, L., Gao, Y. Q., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1229223 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Refined sgRNA efficacy prediction improves large- and small-scale CRISPR–Cas9 applications
Labuhn, M., Adams, F. F., Ng, M. S. W., Knoess, S., Schambach, A., Charpentier, E., Schwarzer, A., Mateo, J. L., Klusmann, J., & Heckl, D. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx1268 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Guo, Y., Mahony, S., & Gifford, D. K. (2012) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002638 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Yamashita, K., Motohashi, M., & Yashiki, T. (1989) · Journal of Chromatography B Biomedical Sciences and Applications · doi:10.1016/s0378-4347(00)83043-1 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Deciphering eukaryotic gene-regulatory logic with 100 million random promoters
de Boer, C. G., Vaishnav, E. D., Sadeh, R., Abeyta, E. L., Friedman, N., & Regev, A. (2020) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0315-8 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Oler, A. J., Alla, R., Roberts, D. N., Wong, A., Hollenhorst, P. C., Chandler, K. J., Cassiday, P. A., Nelson, C. A., Hagedorn, C. H., Graves, B. J., et al. (2010) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.1801 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Tokuzawa, Y., Kaiho, E., Maruyama, M., Takahashi, K., Mitsui, K., Maeda, M., Niwa, H., & Yamanaka, S. (2003) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.23.8.2699-2708.2003 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
ChIP-nexus enables improved detection of in vivo transcription factor binding footprints
He, Q., Johnston, J., & Zeitlinger, J. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3121 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Self-citationA Transcription Factor Collective Defines Cardiac Cell Fate and Reflects Lineage History
Junion, G., Spivakov, M., Girardot, C., Braun, M., Gustafson, E. H., Birney, E., & Furlong, E. E. M. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.030 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Repression oflacPromoter as a Function of Distance, Phase and Quality of an AuxiliarylacOperator
Müller, J., Oehler, S., & Müller‐Hill, B. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0143 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Discriminative prediction of mammalian enhancers from DNA sequencePreprint
Lee, D., Karchin, R., & Beer, M. (2011) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.121905.111 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Structural perspective of cooperative transcription factor binding
Morgunova, E. Y., & Taipale, J. (2017) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2017.03.006 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
PeakAnalyzer: Genome-wide annotation of chromatin binding and modification loci
Salmon‐Divon, M., Dvinge, H., Koort, K., & Bertone, P. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-415 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Moqtaderi, Z., Wang, J., Raha, D., White, R. J., Snyder, M. P., Weng, Z., & Struhl, K. (2010) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.1794 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Xie, D., Chen, C.-C., Ptaszek, L. M., Shu Dong, X. I. A. O., Cao, X., Fang, F., Ng, H. H., Lewin, H. A., Cowan, C. A., & Zhong, S. (2010) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.100594.109 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Infertility treated with donor specific lymphocytes in recurrent idiopathic spontaneous abortion.
Bernstein, I. L., Bernstein, D. I., Balakrishnan, K., & Korbee, L. L. (1989) · PubMed · Cited by 221 · see citing works
A Deep Neural Network for Predicting and Engineering Alternative Polyadenylation
Bogard, N., Linder, J., Rosenberg, A. B., & Seelig, G. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.04.046 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Quang, D., & Xie, X. (2019) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.03.020 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Computing smooth molecular surfaces
Varshney, A., Brooks, F. P., & Wright, W. V. (1994) · IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications · doi:10.1109/38.310720 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
A <i>Sox2</i> distal enhancer cluster regulates embryonic stem cell differentiation potential
Zhou, H. Y., Katsman, Y., Dhaliwal, N. K., Davidson, S., Macpherson, N. N., Sakthidevi, M., Collura, F., & Mitchell, J. A. (2014) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.248526.114 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Moorthy, S. D., Davidson, S., Shchuka, V. M., Singh, G., Malek-Gilani, N., Langroudi, L., Martchenko, A., So, V., Macpherson, N. N., & Mitchell, J. A. (2016) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.210930.116 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
CRIS.py: A Versatile and High-throughput Analysis Program for CRISPR-based Genome Editing
Connelly, J. P., & Pruett‐Miller, S. M. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-40896-w · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Sun, Y., Nien, C.-Y., Chen, K., Liu, H.-Y., Johnston, J. J., Zeitlinger, J., & Rushlow, C. A. (2015) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.192542.115 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Self-citationParalysis of skeletal muscle by butanedione monoxime, a chemical phosphatase
Fryer, M. W., Gage, P. W., Neering, I. R., Dulhunty, A. F., & Lamh, G. D. (1988) · Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1007/bf00581649 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Computational Models for Neurogenic Gene Expression in the Drosophila Embryo
Zinzen, R. P., Senger, K., Levine, M., & Papatsenko, D. (2006) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.05.044 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Williams, D. C., Cai, M., & Clore, G. M. (2004) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m309790200 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Regulation of transcription: from lambda to eukaryotes
Ptashne, M. (2005) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2005.04.003 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Swanson, C. I., Evans, N. C., & Barolo, S. (2010) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2009.12.026 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
The Kipoi repository accelerates community exchange and reuse of predictive models for genomics
Avsec, Ž., Kreuzhuber, R., Israeli, J., Xu, N., Cheng, J., Shrikumar, A., Banerjee, A., Kim, D. S., Beier, T., Urban, L., et al. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0140-0 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Self-citationDistinguishing direct versus indirect transcription factor–DNA interactionsPreprint
Gordân, R., Hartemink, A. J., & Bulyk, M. L. (2009) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.094144.109 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Umap and Bismap: quantifying genome and methylome mappability
Karimzadeh, M., Ernst, C., Kundaje, A. B., & Hoffman, M. M. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky677 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Self-citationTomilin, A. N., Reményi, A., Lins, K., Bak, H., Leidel, S. A., Vriend, G., Wilmanns, M., & Schöler, H. R. (2000) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00189-6 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Todd, C. D., Deniz, Ö., Taylor, D., & Branco, M. R. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.44344 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Requirement of Nanog dimerization for stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency
Wang, J., Levasseur, D. N., & Orkin, S. H. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0802288105 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
A direct physical interaction between Nanog and Sox2 regulates embryonic stem cell self‐renewal
Gagliardi, A., Mullin, N. P., Tan, Z. Y., Colby, D., Kousa, A. I., Halbritter, F., Weiss, J. T., Felker, A., Bezstarosti, K., Favaro, R., et al. (2013) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2013.161 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
DEEP MOTIF DASHBOARD: VISUALIZING AND UNDERSTANDING GENOMIC SEQUENCES USING DEEP NEURAL NETWORKS
Lanchantin, J., Singh, R., Wang, B., & Qi, Y. (2016) · Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (PSB) · doi:10.1142/9789813207813_0025 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Super-Enhancers at the Nanog Locus Differentially Regulate Neighboring Pluripotency-Associated Genes
Blinka, S. M., Reimer, M. H., Pulakanti, K., & Rao, S. (2016) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.002 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Li, Q., & Wränge, Ö. (1995) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.15.8.4375 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Starick, S. R., Ibn-Salem, J., Jurk, M., Hernandez, C., Love, M. I., Chung, H., Vingron, M., Thomas‐Chollier, M., & Meijsing, S. H. (2015) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.185157.114 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Novo, C. L., Javierre, B.-M., Cairns, J., Segonds-Pichon, A., Wingett, S. W., Freire-Pritchett, P., Furlan-Magaril, M., Schoenfelder, S., Fraser, P., & Rugg-Gunn, P. J. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.040 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Information display by transcriptional enhancers
Kulkarni, M. M., & Arnosti, D. N. (2003) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.00890 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Coordinate enhancers share common organizational features in the <i>Drosophila</i> genome
Erives, A., & Levine, M. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0400611101 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Systematic interrogation of human promoters
Weingarten-Gabbay, S., Nir, R., Lubliner, S., Sharon, E., Kalma, Y., Weinberger, A., & Segal, E. (2019) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.236075.118 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
A Statistical Framework for the Analysis of ChIP-Seq Data
Kuan, P. F., Chung, D., Pan, G., Thomson, J. A., Stewart, R. M., & Keleş, S. (2011) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2011.ap09706 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Friman, E. T., Deluz, C., Meireles-Filho, A. C. A., Govindan, S., Gardeux, V., Deplancke, B., & Suter, D. M. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.50087 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Functional cis-regulatory modules encoded by mouse-specific endogenous retrovirus
Sundaram, V., Choudhary, M. N. K., Pehrsson, E. C., Xing, X., Fiore, C., Pandey, M., Maricque, B. B., Udawatta, M., Ngo, D., Chen, Y., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14550 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Discovering epistatic feature interactions from neural network models of regulatory DNA sequences
Greenside, P., Shimko, T. C., Fordyce, P. M., & Kundaje, A. B. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty575 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Self-citationLong-range repression in the Drosophila embryo.
Cai, H. N., Arnosti, D. N., & Levine, M. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.18.9309 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Lusk, R. W., & Eisen, M. B. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000829 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
King, D., Hong, C. K., Shepherdson, J. L., Granas, D. M., Maricque, B. B., & Cohen, B. A. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.41279 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Design flexibility in cis-regulatory control of gene expression: Synthetic and comparative evidence
Liberman, L. M., & Stathopoulos, A. (2009) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.12.020 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Klemenz, R., Stillman, D. J., & Geiduschek, E. P. (1982) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.79.20.6191 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Identifying transcriptional cis‐regulatory modules in animal genomes
Suryamohan, K., & Halfon, M. S. (2014) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Developmental Biology · doi:10.1002/wdev.168 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Yardımcı, G. G., Frank, C. L., Crawford, G. E., & Ohler, U. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku810 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
A dynamic interplay of enhancer elements regulates Klf4 expression in naïve pluripotencyPreprint
Xie, L., Torigoe, S. E., Xiao, J., Mai, D. H., Li, L., Davis, F. P., Dong, P., Marie-Nelly, H., Grimm, J. B., Lavis, L. D., et al. (2017) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.303321.117 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
The clinical immunobiology of interleukin-2: potential modified uses for improved cancer treatment.
Voss, S. D., Weil-Hillman, G., Hank, J. A., Sosman, J. A., & Sondel, P. M. (1989) · PubMed Central · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Erceg, J., Saunders, T. E., Girardot, C., Devos, D. P., Hufnagel, L., & Furlong, E. E. M. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004060 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Selective influence of Sox2 on POU transcription factor binding in embryonic and neural stem cells
Mistri, T. K., Devasia, A. G., Chu, L. T., Ng, W. P., Halbritter, F., Colby, D., Martynoga, B., Tomlinson, S. R., Chambers, I., Robson, P., et al. (2015) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.201540467 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Okamoto, T., Kurahashi, K., & Fujiwara, M. (1988) · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3565(25)24089-7 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Drosophila poised enhancers are generated during tissue patterning with the help of repressionPreprint
Koenecke, N., Johnston, J. J., He, Q., Meier, S. R., & Zeitlinger, J. (2016) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.209486.116 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationOrganization of developmental enhancers in the Drosophila embryo
Papatsenko, D., Goltsev, Y., & Levine, M. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp619 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Mapping nucleosome positions using DNase-seqPreprint
Zhong, J., Luo, K., Winter, P. S., Crawford, G. E., Iversen, E. S., & Hartemink, A. J. (2016) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.195602.115 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Hayashi, Y., Caboni, L., Das, D., Yumoto, F., Clayton, T., Deller, M. C., Nguyen, P. T., Farr, C. L., Chiu, H., Miller, M. D., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1502855112 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
He, X., Chen, C.-C., Hong, F., Fang, F., Sinha, S., Ng, H., & Zhong, S. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008155 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Wang, J., Zhuang, J., Iyer, S., Lin, X., Whitfield, T. W., Greven, M. C., Pierce, B. G., Dong, X., Kundaje, A. B., Cheng, Y., et al. (2013) · Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics · doi:10.1080/07391102.2013.786511 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationInteractions between pluripotency factors specify<i>cis</i>-regulation in embryonic stem cells
Fiore, C., & Cohen, B. A. (2016) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.200733.115 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Discovering homotypic binding events at high spatial resolution
Guo, Y., Papachristoudis, G., Altshuler, R. C., Gerber, G. K., Jaakkola, T., Gifford, D. K., & Mahony, S. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq590 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Sayal, R., Dresch, J. M., Pushel, I., Taylor, B. R., & Arnosti, D. N. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.08445 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Cui, F., & Zhurkin, V. B. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt943 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Computational Identification of Diverse Mechanisms Underlying Transcription Factor-DNA Occupancy
Cheng, Q., Kazemian, M., Pham, H. N., Blatti, C. A., Celniker, S., Wolfe, S. A., Brodsky, M. H., & Sinha, S. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003571 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Mariani, L., Weinand, K., Vedenko, A., Barrera, L. A., & Bulyk, M. L. (2017) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2017.06.015 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Characterizing protein–DNA binding event subtypes in ChIP-exo data
Yamada, N. C. F., Lai, W., Farrell, N. P., Pugh, B. F., & Mahony, S. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty703 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Capicua controls Toll/IL-1 signaling targets independently of RTK regulation
Papagianni, A. A., Forés, M., Shao, W., He, S., Koenecke, N., Andreu, M. J., Samper, N., Paroush, Z., González‐Crespo, S., Zeitlinger, J., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1713930115 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationJankowski, A., Szczurek, E., Jauch, R., Tiuryn, J., & Prabhakar, S. (2013) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.154922.113 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Ghosh, R. P., Shi, Q., Yang, L., Reddick, M. P., Tv, N., Zhurkin, V. B., Fordyce, P. M., Stasevich, T. J., Chang, H. Y., Greenleaf, W. J., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11118-8 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Liu, F., & Posakony, J. W. (2012) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002796 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Categorical spectral analysis of periodicity in nucleosomal DNA
Jin, H., Rube, H. T., & Song, J. S. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw101 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Esrrb extinction triggers dismantling of naïve pluripotency and marks commitment to differentiation
Festuccia, N., Halbritter, F., Corsinotti, A., Gagliardi, A., Colby, D., Tomlinson, S. R., & Chambers, I. (2018) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201695476 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Avsec, Ž., Barekatain, M., Cheng, J., & Gagneur, J. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx727 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationMistri, T. K., Arindrarto, W., Ng, W. P., Wang, C., Lim, L. H., Sun, L., Chambers, I., Wohland, T., & Robson, P. (2018) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bcj20170418 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
DNase-seq predicts regions of rotational nucleosome stability across diverse human cell typesPreprint
Winter, D., Song, L.-Y., Mukherjee, S., Furey, T., & Crawford, G. E. (2013) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.150482.112 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Merino, F., Bouvier, B., & Cojocaru, V. (2015) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004287 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Tseng, A. M., Shrikumar, A., & Kundaje, A. B. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.06.11.147272 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationNg, F., Schütte, J., Ruau, D., Diamanti, E., Hannah, R., Kinston, S., & Göttgens, B. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku1254 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Using synthetic biology to study gene regulatory evolution
Crocker, J., & Ilsley, G. R. (2017) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2017.09.001 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Distinct Contributions of Tryptophan Residues within the Dimerization Domain to Nanog Function
Mullin, N. P., Gagliardi, A., Khoa, L. T. P., Colby, D., Hall-Ponselé, E., Rowe, A. J., & Chambers, I. (2016) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2016.12.001 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Wnuk, K., Sudol, J., Givechian, K. B., Soon‐Shiong, P., Rabizadeh, S., Szeto, C. W., & Vaske, C. J. (2019) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2019.09.018 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
PAtCh-Cap: input strategy for improving analysis of ChIP-exo data sets and beyond
Terooatea, T. W., Pozner, A., & Buck‐Koehntop, B. A. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw741 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Hartonen, T., Sahu, B., Dave, K., Kivioja, T., & Taipale, J. (2016) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw448 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Istrail, S. (2019) · Journal of Computational Biology · doi:10.1089/cmb.2019.0144 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Improving interpretability of deep learning models: splicing codes as a case studyPreprint
Jha, A., Aicher, J. K., Singh, D., & Barash, Y. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/700096 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
King, D., Maricque, B. B., & Cohen, B. A. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/398107 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 163 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [19]Hughes JD, Estep PW, Tavazoie S & Church GM Computational identification of cis-regulatory elements associated with groups of functionally related genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Mol. Biol 296, 1205– 1214 (2000). 10698627
- [41]Shrikumar A TF-MoDISco v0.4.2.2-alpha: Technical Note. arXiv (2018).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
JASPAR 2022: the 9th release of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles
Castro-Mondragon, J. A., Riudavets-Puig, R., Rauluseviciute, I., Berhanu Lemma, R., Turchi, L., Blanc-Mathieu, R., Lucas, J., Boddie, P., Khan, A., Manosalva Pérez, N., et al. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1113 · Cited by 1,935 · see citing works
“A novel generation of computational models based on machine learning approaches such as deep learning are arising (68,69).”
Effective gene expression prediction from sequence by integrating long-range interactions
Avsec, Ž., Agarwal, V., Visentin, D., Ledsam, J. R., Grabska-Barwinska, A., Taylor, K. R., Assael, Y., Jumper, J., Kohli, P., & Kelley, D. R. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01252-x · Cited by 1,326 · see citing works
“Machine learning success depends on the training data, so increasing the resolution and quality of the target tracks 14 , and curating data from additional organisms 2 , would likely boost performance.”
BackgroundSelf-citationJASPAR 2024: 20th anniversary of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles
Rauluševičiūtė, I., Puig, R. R., Blanc‐Mathieu, R., Castro-Mondragon, J. A., Ferenc, K., Kumar, V., Lemma, R. B., Lucas, J., Chèneby, J., Baranas̆ić, D., et al. (2023) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1059 · Cited by 1,110 · see citing works
“Mostly based on convolutional neural networks, deep learning models are now considered state-of-the-art to accurately model data generated from genomic assays such as ChIP-seq, ChIP-nexus, or A T AC-seq ( 47– 49 ).”
MethodNucleotide Transformer: building and evaluating robust foundation models for human genomics
Dalla-Torre, H., Gonzalez, L., Mendoza-Revilla, J., Lopez Carranza, N., Grzywaczewski, A. H., Oteri, F., Dallago, C., Trop, E., de Almeida, B. P., Sirelkhatim, H., et al. (2025) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02523-z · Cited by 656 · see citing works
“In this context, specialized deep-learning (DL) models have been trained to uncover meaningful patterns of DNA 9–12 .”
InfluentialGENCODE: reference annotation for the human and mouse genomes in 2023
Frankish, A., Sala, S. C., Diekhans, M., Jungreis, I., Loveland, J. E., Mudge, J. M., Sisu, C., Wright, J. C., Arnan, C., Barnes, I., et al. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1071 · Cited by 617 · see citing works
Self-citationWILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts
Koh, P. W., Sagawa, S., Marklund, H., Xie, S. M., Zhang, M., Balsubramani, A., Hu, W., Yasunaga, M., Phillips, R. L., Gao, I., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.07421 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Self-citationAlphaGenome: advancing regulatory variant effect prediction with a unified DNA sequence model
Avsec, Ž., Latysheva, N., Cheng, J., Novati, G., Taylor, K. R., Ward, T., Bycroft, C., Nicolaisen, L., Arvaniti, E., Pan, J., et al. (2025) · doi:10.1101/2025.06.25.661532 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Self-citationHow to build the virtual cell with artificial intelligence: Priorities and opportunities
Bunne, C., Roohani, Y., Rosen, Y., Gupta, A., Zhang, X., Roed, M., Alexandrov, T., AlQuraishi, M., Brennan, P., Burkhardt, D. B., et al. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.11.015 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
“147 Despite their extensive utility, CNNs are increasingly being supplemented or replaced by vision transformer models, 72 which leverage self-attention mechanisms to process entire images in parallel.”
Obtaining genetics insights from deep learning via explainable artificial intelligence
Novakovsky, G., Dexter, N., Libbrecht, M. W., Wasserman, W. W., & Mostafavi, S. (2022) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-022-00532-2 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Advancing regulatory variant effect prediction with AlphaGenome
Avsec, Ž., Latysheva, N., Cheng, J., Novati, G., Taylor, K. R., Ward, T., Bycroft, C., Nicolaisen, L., Arvaniti, E., Pan, J., et al. (2026) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-10014-0 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Deciphering the multi-scale, quantitative cis-regulatory code
Kim, S., & Wysocka, J. (2023) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2022.12.032 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
A sequence-based global map of regulatory activity for deciphering human genetics
Chen, K. M., Wong, A. K., Troyanskaya, O. G., & Zhou, J. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01102-2 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Transcription factors: Bridge between cell signaling and gene regulation
Weidemüller, P., Kholmatov, M. M., Petsalaki, E., & Zaugg, J. B. (2021) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.202000034 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
de Almeida, B. P., Reiter, F., Pagani, M., & Stark, A. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.05.463203 · Cited by 284
Predicting RNA splicing from DNA sequence using Pangolin
Zeng, T., & Li, Y. I. (2022) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-022-02664-4 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
“Using sequences frommultiple species [18] and quantitative over binary labels [2, 19] have been shown to substantially improve prediction in some applications but have not yet been tested, to the best of our knowledge, in the context of RNA splicing.”
Methodde Almeida, B. P., Reiter, F., Pagani, M., & Stark, A. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01048-5 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
“49 ).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTranscription factors interact with RNA to regulate genes
Oksuz, O., Henninger, J. E., Warneford-Thomson, R., Zheng, M. M., Erb, H., Vancura, A., Overholt, K. J., Hawken, S. W., Banani, S. F., Lauman, R., et al. (2023) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2023.06.012 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
“TFs typically contain DNA-binding domains that recognize specific sequences and multiple TFs collectively bind to enhancers and promoter-proximal regions of genes (Avsec et al., 2021; Panne et al., 2007).”
BackgroundThe evolution, evolvability and engineering of gene regulatory DNA
Vaishnav, E. D., de Boer, C. G., Molinet, J., Yassour, M., Fan, L., Adiconis, X., Thompson, D. A., Levin, J. Z., Cubillos, F. A., & Regev, A. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04506-6 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
“A deep neural network model 20,21,23,61–69 with convolutional layers was constructed and used for designing sequences with high and low expression (Fig.”
MethodPredicting RNA-seq coverage from DNA sequence as a unifying model of gene regulation
Linder, J., Srivastava, D., Yuan, H., Agarwal, V., & Kelley, D. R. (2025) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-024-02053-6 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
“We used a Poisson loss function, but decomposed the loss analogous to BPnet to separate magnitude and shape terms [7].”
Artificial intelligence in cancer research, diagnosis and therapy
Elemento, O., Leslie, C., Lundin, J., & Tourassi, G. (2021) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-021-00399-1 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
“A beautiful recent study in this vein introduced BPNet 13 , a model for prediction of nucleotide-resolution transcription factor occupancy profiles and learning transcription factor ‘motif grammars’, embeddings — mappings of high-dimensional input data to a lower-dimensional ‘bottleneck’ or latent space — bringing new…”
BackgroundSequence determinants of human gene regulatory elements
Sahu, B., Hartonen, T., Pihlajamaa, P., Wei, B., Dave, K., Zhu, F., Kaasinen, E., Lidschreiber, K., Lidschreiber, M., Daub, C. O., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-01009-4 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Adipose tissue at single-cell resolution
Maniyadath, B., Zhang, Q., Gupta, R. K., & Mandrup, S. (2023) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2023.02.002 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Short tandem repeats bind transcription factors to tune eukaryotic gene expression
Horton, C. A., Alexandari, A. M., Hayes, M. G. B., Marklund, E., Schaepe, J. M., Aditham, A. K., Shah, N., Suzuki, P., Shrikumar, A., Afek, A., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.add1250 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Self-citationSequence-based modeling of three-dimensional genome architecture from kilobase to chromosome scale
Zhou, J. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01065-4 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
“Decoders at lower levels receive input from the corresponding level of sequence representations, the interaction matrix prediction from one-level above and a 2D pairwise distance encoding matrix as an auxiliary input.”
BackgroundDecoding gene regulation in the fly brain
Janssens, J., Aibar, S., Taskiran, I. I., Ismail, J. N., Gomez, A. E., Aughey, G., Spanier, K. I., De Rop, F. V., González-Blas, C. B., Dionne, M., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04262-z · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Decoding gene regulation in the fly brain
Janssens, J., Aibar, S., Taskiran, I. I., Ismail, J. N., Spanier, K. I., Bravo González-Blas, C., Quan, X. J., Papasokrati, D., Hulselmans, G., Makhzami, S., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.11.454937 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Cell-type-directed design of synthetic enhancers
Taskiran, I. I., Spanier, K. I., Dickmänken, H., Kempynck, N., Pančíková, A., Ekşi, E. C., Hulselmans, G., Ismail, J. N., Theunis, K., Vandepoel, R., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06936-2 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
“Here we show that deep learning models 2–6 , can be used to efficiently design synthetic, cell-type-specific enhancers, starting from random sequences, and that this optimization process allows detailed tracing of enhancer features at single-nucleotide resolution.”
BackgroundInfluentialUyehara, C. M., & Apostolou, E. (2023) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112068 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Enhancer grammar in development, evolution, and disease: dependencies and interplay
Jindal, G. A., & Farley, E. K. (2021) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2021.02.016 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Machine-guided design of cell-type-targeting cis-regulatory elements
Gosai, S. J., Castro, R. I., Fuentes, N., Butts, J. C., Mouri, K., Alasoadura, M., Kales, S., Nguyen, T. T. L., Noche, R. R., Rao, A. S., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08070-z · Cited by 142 · see citing works
“Over the course of this study, several advances in DNA modelling have been reported by other groups that would probably yield such improvements 14,25,36,81,82 , but were not tested here.”
Pampari, A., Shcherbina, A., Kvon, E. Z., Kosicki, M., Nair, S., Kundu, S., Kathiria, A. S., Risca, V. I., Kuningas, K., Alasoo, K., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.12.25.630221 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Self-citationSasse, A., Ng, B., Spiro, A. E., Tasaki, S., Bennett, D. A., Gaiteri, C., De Jager, P. L., Chikina, M., & Mostafavi, S. (2023) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-023-01524-6 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
“State-of-the-art models can reproduce experimental measurements with a high degree of accuracy and enable mechanistic insights through their learned DNA features 1,2,15 .”
AI applications in functional genomics
Caudai, C., Galizia, A., Geraci, F., Pera, L. L., Morea, V., Salerno, E., Via, A., & Colombo, T. (2021) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2021.10.009 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
“More recently, Avsec et al. [155] introduced a DL approach to unravel the influence of motif spacing between neighbour transcription-factor binding sites on transcription factor cooperativity.”
BackgroundKarollus, A., Mauermeier, T., & Gagneur, J. (2023) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-023-02899-9 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
“A recent study, for example, used a deep model to analyze the impact of helical periodicity on TF binding [30].”
BackgroundSelf-citationSong, Z., Huang, D., Song, B., Chen, K., Song, Y., Liu, G., Su, J., de Magalhães, J. P., Rigden, D. J., & Meng, J. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24313-3 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
scBasset: sequence-based modeling of single-cell ATAC-seq using convolutional neural networks
Yuan, H., & Kelley, D. R. (2022) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01562-8 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
“Methods such as TF-MoDISco could be applied to scBasset ISM scores for de novo motif discovery 14,34 .”
MethodMachine learning for perturbational single-cell omics
Ji, Y., Lotfollahi, M., Wolf, F. A., & Theis, F. J. (2021) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2021.05.016 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Personal transcriptome variation is poorly explained by current genomic deep learning models
Huang, C., Shuai, R. W., Baokar, P., Chung, R., Rastogi, R., Kathail, P., & Ioannidis, N. M. (2023) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-023-01574-w · Cited by 127 · see citing works
“These genomic deep learning models are trained using genome-wide data from a variety of cell types and cellular contexts and have been shown to learn biologically relevant regulatory motifs within the input DNA sequence [8, 9].”
Integrating multi-omics data with EHR for precision medicine using advanced artificial intelligence
Tong, L., Shi, W., Isgut, M., Zhong, Y., Lais, P., Gloster, L., Sun, J., Swain, A., Giuste, F., & Wang, M. D. (2024) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2023.3324264 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
“Avsec et al. [158] proposed a Base Pair Network to reveal regulatory code by accurately predicting transcription factor binding from DNA sequences.”
BackgroundTan, J., Shenker-Tauris, N., Rodriguez-Hernaez, J., Wang, E., Sakellaropoulos, T., Boccalatte, F. E., Thandapani, P., Skok, J. A., Aifantis, I., Fenyö, D., et al. (2023) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01612-8 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
“Building on C.Origami’s model architecture, we first developed two fast approaches”
Mammalian evolution of human cis-regulatory elements and transcription factor binding sites
Andrews, G., Fan, K., Pratt, H. E., Phalke, N. N., Karlsson, E. K., Lindblad‐Toh, K., Gazal, S., Moore, J. E., Weng, Z., Andrews, G., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abn7930 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Ovek, D., Rauluševičiūtė, I., Aronsen, D. R., Blanc‐Mathieu, R., Bonthuis, I., Beukelaer, H. D., Ferenc, K., Jegou, A., Kumar, V., Lemma, R. B., et al. (2025) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaf1209 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
“We trained a specific BPNet [ 25 ] model for each ChIP-seq dataset to predict the ChIP-seq genomic tracks at base-pair resolution from input DNA sequences (see Supplementary Fig.”
InfluentialSelf-citationChen, V., Yang, M., Cui, W., Kim, J. S., Talwalkar, A., & Ma, J. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02359-7 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Cross-species analysis of enhancer logic using deep learning
Minnoye, L., Taskiran, I. I., Mauduit, D., Fazio, M., Van Aerschot, L., Hulselmans, G., Christiaens, V., Makhzami, S., Seltenhammer, M., Karras, P., et al. (2020) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.260844.120 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
“2018), TF binding sites (Wang et al. 2018; Avsec et al. 2020), DNAmethylation (Angermueller et al.”
BackgroundMethodAmeen, M., Sundaram, L., Shen, M., Banerjee, A., Kundu, S., Nair, S., Shcherbina, A., Gu, M., Wilson, K. D., Varadarajan, A., et al. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.11.028 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Self-citationLinder, J., Bogard, N., Rosenberg, A. B., & Seelig, G. (2020) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2020.05.007 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Hold out the genome: a roadmap to solving the cis-regulatory code
de Boer, C. G., & Taipale, J. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06661-w · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Sequence basis of transcription initiation in the human genome
Dudnyk, K., Cai, D., Shi, C., Xu, J., & Zhou, J. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adj0116 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Seven myths of how transcription factors read the cis-regulatory code
Zeitlinger, J. (2020) · Current Opinion in Systems Biology · doi:10.1016/j.coisb.2020.08.002 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Self-citationAlQuraishi, M., & Sorger, P. K. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01283-4 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Transformers and genome language models
Consens, M. E., Dufault, C., Wainberg, M., Forster, D., Karimzadeh, M., Goodarzi, H., Theis, F. J., Moses, A. M., & Wang, B. (2025) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-025-01007-9 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Deep flanking sequence engineering for efficient promoter design using DeepSEED
Zhang, P., Wang, H., Xu, H., Wei, L., Liu, L., Hu, Z., & Wang, X. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41899-y · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Deciphering the impact of genomic variation on function
Writing group (ordered by contribution), Engreitz, J., Lawson, H. A., Singh, H., Starita, L. M., Hon, G. C., Carter, H. K., Sahni, N., Reddy, T. E., Lin, X., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07510-0 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
“…that generalize across contexts—for example, to link genetic variants to effects on transcription factor binding and chromatin accessibility 57,61–64 , connect regulatory elements to their target genes 64,85,86 , or identify causal genes and cell types enriched for heritability for complex…”
Self-citationGenome-wide mapping of somatic mutation rates uncovers drivers of cancer
Sherman, M. A., Yaari, A. U., Priebe, O., Dietlein, F., Loh, P.-R., & Berger, B. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01353-8 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Wang, S. K., Nair, S., Li, R., Kraft, K., Pampari, A., Patel, A., Kang, J. B., Luong, C., Kundaje, A. B., & Chang, H. Y. (2022) · Cell Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.xgen.2022.100164 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
“As a final method to prioritize SNPs in our dataset, we therefore trained CNNs derived from the BPNet architecture on scATAC-seq profiles for each of the 13 retinal cell types (Figure 6A, S9A, and S9B).(12) At each SNP region, we compared the projected per-base change in chromatin accessibility between reference and a…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationDecoding disease: from genomes to networks to phenotypes
Wong, A. K., Sealfon, R. S. G., Theesfeld, C. L., & Troyanskaya, O. G. (2021) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-021-00389-x · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Deep learning the cis-regulatory code for gene expression in selected model plants
Peleke, F. F., Zumkeller, S. M., Gültaş, M., Schmitt, A. O., & Szymański, J. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-47744-0 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
“In contrast, to the 2D convolutional and max pooling layers used by Washburn and colleagues 18 , we used 1D layers asit has been the choicein morerecent studies inferring gene expression or protein interaction from DNA sequence using deep learning, e.g. the Enformer or BPNet architecture 17,21 .”
Deep learning in CRISPR-Cas systems: a review of recent studies
Lee, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2023.1226182 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
“Similar predictive capabilities were showcased by Avsec et al. (2021) through their BPNet model, enabling the discovery of soft syntax rules for cooperative transcription factor binding interactions. Lastly, Muller et al. (2020) utilized deep learning to gauge public opinions on CRISPR-Cas9, providing a compelling per…”
BackgroundInfluentialPosition-dependent function of human sequence-specific transcription factors
Duttke, S. H. C., Guzman, C., Chang, M. W., Santos, N. P. D., McDonald, B. R., Xie, J., Carlin, A. F., Heinz, S., & Benner, C. W. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07662-z · Cited by 83 · see citing works
“Enrichment patterns for several TF binding sites exhibited an approximately 10 bp periodicity, suggesting that the rotational position of TFs relative to the TSS affects transcription initiation 5,14,35 (Extended Data Fig.”
Current challenges in understanding the role of enhancers in disease
Zaugg, J. B., Sahlén, P., Andersson, R., Alberich-Jordà, M., de Laat, W. L., Deplancke, B., Ferrer, J. P., Mandrup, S., Natoli, G., Plewczyński, D., et al. (2022) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-022-00896-3 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters
Ray-Jones, H., & Spivakov, M. (2021) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-021-03903-w · Cited by 81 · see citing works
“Additionally, a deep learning algorithm applied to binding of pluripotency TFs at base resolution in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) suggested a “soft motif syntax” whereby TFs help each other to bind directly to the enhancer with a lenient distance-dependency between binding sites [98].”
BackgroundKoo, P. K., Majdandzic, A., Ploenzke, M., Anand, P., & Paul, S. B. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008925 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
“Dilated convolutions combined with skipped connections have been previously employed in various settings for regulatory genomics [16, 17, 41].”
BackgroundMethodScalable Functional Assays for the Interpretation of Human Genetic Variation
Tabet, D. R., Parikh, V. N., Mali, P., Roth, F. P., & Claussnitzer, M. (2022) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-072920-032107 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
“Extensive genome-scale measurements of expression, chromatin accessibility, and epigenetic marks have fueled the development of models to predict gene regulatory variant effects from DNA sequences (13, 14, 29, 40, 103, 204).”
BackgroundGeorgakopoulos-Soares, I., Deng, C., Agarwal, V., Chan, C. S. Y., Zhao, J., Inoue, F., & Ahituv, N. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37960-5 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
“In addition, in previous work, we identi fi ed widespread transcriptional strand asymmetries in the orientation of TFBSs across human transcribed regions 10 , a research area in which there have been a few studies to date 11 – 15 .”
The dynamic, combinatorial cis-regulatory lexicon of epidermal differentiation
Kim, D. S., Risca, V. I., Reynolds, D. L., Chappell, J., Rubin, A. J., Jung, N., Donohue, L. K. H., Lopez-Pajares, V., Kathiria, A. S., Shi, M., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00947-3 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Self-citationInterpreting non-coding disease-associated human variants using single-cell epigenomics
Gaulton, K. J., Preißl, S., & Ren, B. (2023) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-023-00598-6 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
“A neural network, BPNet 133 , was used to model cell type-specific cCRE activity in the developing cerebral cortex at base-pair resolution, which was then applied to predict variants with functional effects in each cortex cell type.”
MethodBrennan, K., Weilert, M., Krueger, S., Pampari, A., Liu, H., Yang, A. W. H., Morrison, J. A., Hughes, T. R., Rushlow, C. A., Kundaje, A. B., et al. (2023) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2023.07.007 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
“To learn DNA sequence rules at the highest possible resolution in the early Drosophila embryo, we used ChIP-nexus, a chromatin immunoprecipitation technique that maps genome-wide TF binding footprints at base-resolution by virtue of a strandspecific exonuclease,(58) and employed a CNN called BPNet, which directly pred…”
Self-citationPredicting gene expression from DNA sequence using deep learning models
Barbadilla-Martínez, L., Klaassen, N. H. M., van Steensel, B., & de Ridder, J. (2025) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-025-00841-2 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Deep learning in next-generation sequencing
Schmidt, B., & Hildebrandt, A. (2020) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2020.10.002 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
“A recent example in the context of NGS is the design of an interpretation tool that learns predictive motif representations for cooperative transcription factor binding interactions from ChIP-nexus sequencing data using DeepLift [52].”
MethodZEB2 Shapes the Epigenetic Landscape of Atherosclerosis
Cheng, P. P., Wirka, R. C., Clarke, S. L., Zhao, Q., Kundu, R. K., Nguyen, T., Nair, S., Sharma, D., Kim, H.-J., Shi, H., et al. (2022) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.121.057789 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationSelective gene expression maintains human tRNA anticodon pools during differentiation
Gao, L., Behrens, A., Rodschinka, G., Forcelloni, S., Wani, S., Strasser, K., & Nedialkova, D. D. (2024) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-023-01317-3 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
“Conceptually, the architecture is based on that described for BPNet 56 with minor adjustments to the size of the receptive field of the network and the output (Extended Data Fig.”
Chromatin interaction–aware gene regulatory modeling with graph attention networksPreprint
Karbalayghareh, A., Şahin, M., & Leslie, C. S. (2022) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.275870.121 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
“Dilated CNNs have been used previously to increase the receptive field of CNN layers in deep learning models that predict epigenomic data from DNA sequence, such as Basenji [7], BPNet [14], and Xpresso [15].”
MethodSynthetic regulatory genomics uncovers enhancer context dependence at the Sox2 locus
Brosh, R., Coelho, C., Ribeiro-dos-Santos, A. M., Ellis, G., Hogan, M. S., Ashe, H. J., Somogyi, N., Ordóñez, R., Luther, R. D., Huang, E., et al. (2023) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2023.02.027 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
High-throughput PRIME-editing screens identify functional DNA variants in the human genome
Ren, X., Yang, H., Nierenberg, J. L., Sun, Y., Chen, J., Beaman, C., Pham, T., Nobuhara, M., Takagi, M. A., Narayan, V., et al. (2023) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2023.11.021 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Decoding gene regulation in the mouse embryo using single-cell multi-omicsPreprint
Argelaguet, R., Lohoff, T., Li, J., Nakhuda, A., Drage, D., Krueger, F., Velten, L., Clark, S. J., & Reik, W. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.06.15.496239 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
“This stands in contrast with other approaches that have been proposed to predict TF binding from multi-omics data, which employ supervised models that require labelled training data from ChIP-seq experiments (Avsec et al., 2021; Karimzadeh and Hoffman, 2019).”
ResultApplications of deep learning in understanding gene regulation
Li, Z., Gao, E., Zhou, J., Han, W., Xu, X., & Gao, X. (2023) · Cell Reports Methods · doi:10.1016/j.crmeth.2022.100384 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“48 Model-based methods Instead of making post hoc interpretations of the model, it is better to consider interpretability during the model’s development.”
MethodDeep learning and CRISPR-Cas13d ortholog discovery for optimized RNA targeting
Wei, J., Lotfy, P., Faizi, K., Baungaard, S., Gibson, E., Wang, E., Slabodkin, H., Kinnaman, E., Chandrasekaran, S. S., Kitano, H. C., et al. (2023) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2023.11.006 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Predicting mean ribosome load for 5’UTR of any length using deep learning
Karollus, A., Avsec, Ž., & Gagneur, J. (2021) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008982 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationTu, X., Ren, S., Shen, W., Li, J., Li, Y., Li, C., Li, Y., Zong, Z., Xie, W., Grierson, D. S., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35438-4 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Evaluating deep learning for predicting epigenomic profiles
Toneyan, S., Tang, Z., & Koo, P. K. (2022) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00570-9 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Single-cell chromatin accessibility reveals malignant regulatory programs in primary human cancers
Sundaram, L., Kumar, A., Zatzman, M., Salcedo, A., Ravindra, N. G., Shams, S., Louie, B. H., Bagdatli, S. T., Myers, M. A., Sarmashghi, S., et al. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adk9217 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
“…incancers,wetrainedaconvolutionalneural networktolearnamappingfrom1364 – base pair (bp) DNA sequence windows around scATAC-seq peaks and background regions to the pseudobulk peak probability, similar to previous methods ( 9 , 30 – 32 ) (Fig.”
MethodInterpretable detection of novel human viruses from genome sequencing data
Bartoszewicz, J. M., Seidel, A., & Renard, B. Y. (2021) · NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/nargab/lqab004 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
(Alternative) transcription start sites as regulators of RNA processing
Alfonso-Gonzalez, C., & Hilgers, V. (2024) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2024.02.010 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Hoffman, G. E., Bendl, J. M., Girdhar, K., Schadt, E. E., & Roussos, P. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz808 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
“Moreover, there is likely meaningful epigenetic variation outside of strictly defined peak regions and, indeed, there is much interest in performing basepair-level predictions rather than summarizing the epigenetic signal for each peak (28,78).”
BackgroundJanizek, J. D., Dincer, A. B., Çelik, S., Chen, H., Chen, W. C., Naxerova, K., & Lee, S. (2023) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-023-01034-0 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
An integrated view of the structure and function of the human 4D nucleome
Dekker, J., Oksuz, B. A., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Minsk, M. K., Kuang, S., Yang, L., Gibcus, J. H., Krietenstein, N., Rando, O. J., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09890-3 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
“This can be done using explainable artificial intelligence techniques, such as importance scores 128 and in silico mutagenesis 129,130 .”
Evaluating the representational power of pre-trained DNA language models for regulatory genomics
Tang, Z., Somia, N., Yu, Y., & Koo, P. K. (2025) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-025-03674-8 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
“By contrast, supervised deep learning models trained on large troves of functional genomics data in a multitask setting can learn discriminative features related to cis -regulatory mechanisms in the non-coding genome [70, 92–97].”
Deciphering the impact of genetic variation on human polyadenylation using APARENT2
Linder, J., Koplik, S. E., Kundaje, A., & Seelig, G. (2022) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-022-02799-4 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationRay, A., Das, J., & Wenzel, S. E. (2022) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100857 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
“Further, while deep learning approaches have traditionally been hard to interpret, recent techniques have creatively used techniques like backpropagation to make these interpretable and amenable to inference beyond prediction.(118) These methods can integrate multi-omic datasets to uncover signatures of asthma molecul…”
MethodSong, B., Buckler, E. S., Wang, H., Wu, Y., Rees, E. R., Kellogg, E. A., Gates, D. J., Khaipho-Burch, M., Bradbury, P. J., Ross‐Ibarra, J., et al. (2021) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.266528.120 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
“TFs often work cooperatively and the sequence contexts of TF recognition sites or combinatorial recognition of cis-elements are key for TF binding specificity (Tu et al. 2020; Gerstein et al. 2012; O’Malley et al. 2016; Dror et al. 2015; Levo et al. 2015; Avsec et al. 2021).”
BackgroundKing, H. W., Wells, K. L., Shipony, Z., Kathiria, A. S., Wagar, L. E., Lareau, C. A., Orban, N. T., Capasso, R., Davis, M. M., Steinmetz, L. M., et al. (2021) · Science Immunology · doi:10.1126/sciimmunol.abh3768 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
“New advances in neural network–derived methods may prove useful to quantitatively model effects on gene expression in cell type–resolved chromatin accessibility maps ( 17 , 54 ).”
Multiplexed single-cell characterization of alternative polyadenylation regulators
Kowalski, M. H., Wessels, H., Linder, J., Dalgarno, C., Mascio, I., Choudhary, S., Hartman, A., Hao, Y., Kundaje, A. B., & Satija, R. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.06.005 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationA community effort to optimize sequence-based deep learning models of gene regulation
Rafi, A. M., Nogina, D., Penzar, D., Lee, D., Lee, D., KIM, N. S., Kim, S., Kim, D., Shin, Y., Kwak, I., et al. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-024-02414-w · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Lu, A. X., Lu, A. X., Pritišanac, I., Zarin, T., Forman-Kay, J. D., & Moses, A. M. (2022) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010238 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Rewriting regulatory DNA to dissect and reprogram gene expression
Martyn, G. E., Montgomery, M. T., Jones, H., Guo, K., Doughty, B. R., Linder, J., Bisht, D., Xia, F., Cai, X. S., Chen, Z., et al. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2025.03.034 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationButz, S., Schmolka, N., Karemaker, I. D., Villaseñor, R., Schwarz, I., Domcke, S., Uijttewaal, E. C. H., Jude, J., Lienert, F., Krebs, A. R., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01210-z · Cited by 42 · see citing works
“The differential DNA methylation states at the ectopic Airn ICR were stably maintained after prolonged cultivation https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-022-01210-z lack of maintenance, in agreement with an in silico evaluation of ZFP57 binding to wild-type and shuffled Airn ICR sequence using BPNet 28 (Extended Data Fig.”
InfluentialFactorbook: an updated catalog of transcription factor motifs and candidate regulatory motif sites
Pratt, H., Andrews, G., Phalke, N. N., Huey, J. D., Purcaro, M. J., van der Velde, A., Moore, J. E., & Weng, Z. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1039 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Correcting gradient-based interpretations of deep neural networks for genomics
Majdandzic, A., Rajesh, C., & Koo, P. K. (2023) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-023-02956-3 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“To gain insights into the features learned by DNNs, post-hoc attribution methods provide an importance score for each nucleotide in a given sequence; they often reveal biologically meaningful patterns, such as transcription factor binding motifs that are essential for gene regulation [4, 5].”
BackgroundInterpretation of allele-specific chromatin accessibility using cell state–aware deep learning
Atak, Z. K., Taskiran, I. I., Demeulemeester, J., Flerin, C., Mauduit, D., Minnoye, L., Hulselmans, G., Christiaens, V., Ghanem, G.-E., Wouters, J., et al. (2021) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.260851.120 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“However, thesemodels require correct training and rigorous validation and are typically trained either for a single TF (Alipanahi et al. 2015; Lee 2016; Quang and Xie 2019; Avsec et al. 2021) or for hundreds of epigenomic features (Zhou and Troyanskaya 2015; Kelley et al. 2016).”
BackgroundMachine learning applications for therapeutic tasks with genomics data
Huang, K., Xiao, C., Glass, L. M., Critchlow, C. W., Gibson, G. C., & Sun, J. (2021) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2021.100328 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“Recently, Avsec et al.61 have shown the benefits of the base-resolution CNN model in TF binding prediction.”
Background
- Authors
- Avsec, Ž., Weilert, M., Shrikumar, A., Krueger, S., Alexandari, A., Dalal, K., Fropf, R., McAnany, C., Gagneur, J., Kundaje, A., & Zeitlinger, J.
- Affiliations
- Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Kundaje, Anshul
- Zeitlinger, Julia
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Genetics
- Published
- 2021-02-18
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 354-366
- ISSN
- 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1718
- PMC
- PMC8812996
- OpenAlex
- W3130819465
- Cited by
- 610
- References
- 163
- Citations by year
- 2026: 118 · 2025: 108 · 2024: 124 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 90 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 29.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Human Genome Research Institute (1R01HG010211, 1U01HG009431, 1R01HG009674)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (International Student Research Fellowship)
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (1DP2GM123485)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Keywords
- transcription factor binding, pluripotency transcription factors, Nanog, helical periodicity, explainable deep learning
- MeSH terms
- Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells, Nanog Homeobox Protein, Deep Learning, Animals, Binding Sites, Transcription Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Neural Networks, Computer, Computational Biology, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Octamer Transcription Factor-3, Mice, SOXB1 Transcription Factors, Nucleotide Motifs, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review