The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantifying selection in high-throughput Immunoglobulin sequencing data sets
Open accessAbstract
High-throughput immunoglobulin sequencing promises new insights into the somatic hypermutation and antigen-driven selection processes that underlie B-cell affinity maturation and adaptive immunity. The ability to estimate positive and negative selection from these sequence data has broad applications not only for understanding the immune response to pathogens, but is also critical to determining the role of somatic hypermutation in autoimmunity and B-cell cancers. Here, we develop a statistical framework for Bayesian estimation of Antigen-driven SELectIoN (BASELINe) based on the analysis of somatic mutation patterns. Our approach represents a fundamental advance over previous methods by shifting the problem from one of simply detecting selection to one of quantifying selection. Along with providing a more intuitive means to assess and visualize selection, our approach allows, for the first time, comparative analysis between groups of sequences derived from different germline V(D)J segments. Application of this approach to next-generation sequencing data demonstrates different selection pressures for memory cells of different isotypes. This framework can easily be adapted to analyze other types of DNA mutation patterns resulting from a mutator that displays hot/cold-spots, substitution preference or other intrinsic biases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: A problem of significance
Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2886 · Cited by 864
Cited by
The promise and challenge of high-throughput sequencing of the antibody repertoire
Georgiou, G., Ippolito, G. C., Beausang, J., Busse, C. E., Wardemann, H., & Quake, S. R. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2782 · Cited by 652
Vander Heiden, J. A., Yaari, G., Uduman, M., Stern, J. N. H., O’Connor, K. C., Hafler, D. A., Vigneault, F., & Kleinstein, S. H. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu138 · Cited by 465
Self-citationB cells populating the multiple sclerosis brain mature in the draining cervical lymph nodes
Stern, J. N. H., Yaari, G., Vander Heiden, J. A., Church, G., Donahue, W. F., Hintzen, R. Q., Huttner, A. J., Laman, J. D., Nagra, R. M., Nylander, A., et al. (2014) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3008879 · Cited by 441
Self-citationYaari, G., Bolen, C. R., Thakar, J., & Kleinstein, S. H. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt660 · Cited by 261
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yaari, G., Uduman, M., & Kleinstein, S. H.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-05-25
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- e134-e134
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2005988541
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantifying selection in high-throughput Immunoglobulin sequencing data sets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gks457
- The paper
- Yaari, G., Uduman, M., & Kleinstein, S. H. (2012). Quantifying selection in high-throughput Immunoglobulin sequencing data sets. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks457
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.