Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,283

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

COSMIC: exploring the world's knowledge of somatic mutations in human cancer

Open access
Forbes, Simon A., Beare, David, Gunasekaran, Prasad, Leung, Kenric, Bindal, Nidhi, Boutselakis, Harry, Ding, Minjie, Bamford, Sally, Cole, Charlotte, Ward, Sari, Kok, Chai Yin, Jia, Mingming, De, Tisham, Teague, Jon W., Stratton, Michael R., McDermott, Ultan, Campbell, Peter J.·2015·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

COSMIC, the Catalogue Of Somatic Mutations In Cancer (http://cancer.sanger.ac.uk) is the world's largest and most comprehensive resource for exploring the impact of somatic mutations in human cancer. Our latest release (v70; Aug 2014) describes 2 002 811 coding point mutations in over one million tumor samples and across most human genes. To emphasize depth of knowledge on known cancer genes, mutation information is curated manually from the scientific literature, allowing very precise definitions of disease types and patient details. Combination of almost 20,000 published studies gives substantial resolution of how mutations and phenotypes relate in human cancer, providing insights into the stratification of mutations and biomarkers across cancer patient populations. Conversely, our curation of cancer genomes (over 12,000) emphasizes knowledge breadth, driving discovery of unrecognized cancer-driving hotspots and molecular targets. Our high-resolution curation approach is globally unique, giving substantial insight into molecular biomarkers in human oncology. In addition, COSMIC also details more than six million noncoding mutations, 10,534 gene fusions, 61,299 genome rearrangements, 695,504 abnormal copy number segments and 60,119,787 abnormal expression variants. All these types of somatic mutation are annotated to both the human genome and each affected coding gene, then correlated across disease and mutation types.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gku1075

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 2,283

Metadata

Authors
Forbes, S. A., Beare, D., Gunasekaran, P., Leung, K., Bindal, N., Boutselakis, H., Ding, M., Bamford, S., Cole, C., Ward, S., Kok, C. Y., Jia, M., De, T., Teague, J. W., Stratton, M. R., McDermott, U., & Campbell, P. J.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2014-10-29
Volume
43
Issue
D1
Pages
D805-D811
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2118151336
Cited by
2,283
References
3
FWCI
104.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COSMIC: exploring the world's knowledge of somatic mutations in human cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gku1075
The paper
Forbes, S. A., Beare, D., Gunasekaran, P., Leung, K., Bindal, N., Boutselakis, H., Ding, M., Bamford, S., Cole, C., Ward, S., Kok, C. Y., Jia, M., De, T., Teague, J. W., Stratton, M. R., McDermott, U., & Campbell, P. J. (2015). COSMIC: exploring the world's knowledge of somatic mutations in human cancer. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku1075

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.