Cited by 612

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Integration of mapped RNA-Seq reads into automatic training of eukaryotic gene finding algorithm

Lomsadze, Alexandre, Burns, Paul D., Borodovsky, Mark·2014·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

We present a new approach to automatic training of a eukaryotic ab initio gene finding algorithm. With the advent of Next-Generation Sequencing, automatic training has become paramount, allowing genome annotation pipelines to keep pace with the speed of genome sequencing. Earlier we developed GeneMark-ES, currently the only gene finding algorithm for eukaryotic genomes that performs automatic training in unsupervised ab initio mode. The new algorithm, GeneMark-ET augments GeneMark-ES with a novel method that integrates RNA-Seq read alignments into the self-training procedure. Use of ‘assembled’ RNA-Seq transcripts is far from trivial; significant error rate of assembly was revealed in recent assessments. We demonstrated in computational experiments that the proposed method of incorporation of ‘unassembled’ RNA-Seq reads improves the accuracy of gene prediction; particularly, for the 1.3 GB genome of Aedes aegypti the mean value of prediction Sensitivity and Specificity at the gene level increased over GeneMark-ES by 24.5%. In the current surge of genomic data when the need for accurate sequence annotation is higher than ever, GeneMark-ET will be a valuable addition to the narrow arsenal of automatic gene prediction tools.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gku557

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Burge, 1997, Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA, J. Mol. Biol., 268, 78, 10.1006/jmbi.1997.0951 · DOI
  2. Stanke, 2003, Gene prediction with a hidden Markov model and a new intron submodel, Bioinformatics, 19, ii215, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1080 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Korf, 2004, Gene finding in novel genomes, BMC Bioinformatics, 5, 59, 10.1186/1471-2105-5-59 · DOI
  4. Majoros, 2004, TigrScan and GlimmerHMM: two open source ab initio eukaryotic gene-finders, Bioinformatics, 20, 2878, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth315 · DOI
  5. Lomsadze, 2005, Gene identification in novel eukaryotic genomes by self-training algorithm, Nucleic Acids Res., 33, 6494, 10.1093/nar/gki937 · DOI
  6. Ter-Hovhannisyan, 2008, Gene prediction in novel fungal genomes using an ab initio algorithm with unsupervised training, Genome Res., 18, 1979, 10.1101/gr.081612.108 · DOI
  7. Parra, 2000, GeneID in Drosophila, Genome Res., 10, 511, 10.1101/gr.10.4.511 · DOI
  8. Steijger, 2013, Assessment of transcript reconstruction methods for RNA-seq, Nat. Methods, 10, 1177, 10.1038/nmeth.2714 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Parra, 2007, CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes, Bioinformatics, 23, 1061, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm071 · DOI
  10. Megy, 2012, VectorBase: improvements to a bioinformatics resource for invertebrate vector genomics, Nucleic Acids Res., 40, D729, 10.1093/nar/gkr1089 · DOI
  11. Nene, 2007, Genome sequence of Aedes aegypti, a major arbovirus vector, Science, 316, 1718, 10.1126/science.1138878 · DOI
  12. Holt, 2002, The genome sequence of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae, Science, 298, 129, 10.1126/science.1076181 · DOI
  13. Arensburger, 2010, Sequencing of Culex quinquefasciatus establishes a platform for mosquito comparative genomics, Science, 330, 86, 10.1126/science.1191864 · DOI
  14. Adams, 2000, The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster, Science, 287, 2185, 10.1126/science.287.5461.2185 · DOI
  15. McQuilton, 2012, FlyBase 101–the basics of navigating FlyBase, Nucleic Acids Res., 40, D706, 10.1093/nar/gkr1030 · DOI
  16. Jurka, 2005, Repbase update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements, Cytogenet. Genome Res., 110, 462, 10.1159/000084979 · DOI
  17. Trapnell, 2009, TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq, Bioinformatics, 25, 1105, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp120 · DOI
  18. Li, 2013, TrueSight: a new algorithm for splice junction detection using RNA-seq, Nucleic Acids Res., 41, e51, 10.1093/nar/gks1311 · DOI
  19. Burns, 2014, UnSplicer: mapping spliced RNA-Seq reads in compact genomes and filtering noisy splicing, 10.1093/nar/gkt1141 · DOI
  20. Besemer, 1999, Heuristic approach to deriving models for gene finding, Nucleic Acids Res., 27, 3911, 10.1093/nar/27.19.3911 · DOI
  21. Melamud, 2009, Stochastic noise in splicing machinery, Nucleic Acids Res., 37, 4873, 10.1093/nar/gkp471 · DOI
  22. Holt, 2011, MAKER2: an annotation pipeline and genome-database management tool for second-generation genome projects, BMC Bioinformatics, 12, 491, 10.1186/1471-2105-12-491 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Piriyapongsa, 2007, Evaluating the protein coding potential of exonized transposable element sequences, Biol. Direct, 2, 31, 10.1186/1745-6150-2-31 · DOI
  24. Guigo, 2006, EGASP: the human ENCODE Genome Annotation Assessment Project, Genome Biol., 7, S2, 10.1186/gb-2006-7-s1-s2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lomsadze, A., Burns, P. D., & Borodovsky, M.
Affiliations
Joint Georgia Tech and Emory Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Atlanta, GA, USA 30332
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2014-07-02
Volume
42
Issue
15
Pages
e119-e119
ISSN
  • 1362-4962
  • 0305-1048
Cited by
612
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review