The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accurate multiplexing and filtering for high-throughput amplicon-sequencing
Open accessAbstract
Tagging amplicons with tag sequences appended to PCR primers allow the multiplexing of numerous samples for high-throughput sequencing (HTS). This approach is routinely used in HTS-based diversity analyses, especially in microbial ecology and biomedical diagnostics. However, amplicon library preparation is subject to pervasive sample sequence cross-contaminations as a result of tag switching events referred to as mistagging. Here, we sequenced seven amplicon libraries prepared using various multiplexing designs in order to measure the magnitude of this phenomenon and its impact on diversity analyses. Up to 28.2% of the unique sequences correspond to undetectable (critical) mistags in single- or saturated double-tagging libraries. We show the advantage of multiplexing samples following Latin Square Designs in order to optimize the detection of mistags and maximize the information on their distribution across samples. We use this information in designs incorporating PCR replicates to filter the critical mistags and to recover the exact composition of mock community samples. Being parameter-free and data-driven, our approach can provide more accurate and reproducible HTS data sets, improving the reliability of their interpretations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Double indexing overcomes inaccuracies in multiplex sequencing on the Illumina platform
Kircher, M., Sawyer, S., & Meyer, M. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr771 · Cited by 1,106 · cited 5×
“In fact, the occurrence of mistagging events in single-tagging strategies has been suggested by inference from double-tagging data (6), but never directly documented.”
BackgroundInfluentialCarew, M. E., Pettigrove, V. J., Metzeling, L., & Hoffmann, A. A. (2013) · Frontiers in Zoology · doi:10.1186/1742-9994-10-45 · Cited by 243
Cited by
Algorithm for post-clustering curation of DNA amplicon data yields reliable biodiversity estimates
Frøslev, T. G., Kjøller, R., Bruun, H. H., Ejrnæs, R., Brunbjerg, A. K., Pietroni, C., & Hansen, A. J. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01312-x · Cited by 835
Tag jumps illuminated – reducing sequence‐to‐sample misidentifications in metabarcoding studies
Schnell, I. B., Bohmann, K., & Gilbert, M. T. P. (2015) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12402 · Cited by 630
DNA metabarcoding—Need for robust experimental designs to draw sound ecological conclusions
Zinger, L., Bonin, A., Alsos, I. G., Bálint, M., Bik, H., Boyer, F., Chariton, A. A., Creer, S., Coissac, E., Deagle, B. E., et al. (2019) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.15060 · Cited by 438
Self-citationElbrecht, V., Vamos, E. E., Meissner, K., Aroviita, J., & Leese, F. (2017) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12789 · Cited by 385
Jiao, S., Chen, W., & Wei, G. (2017) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.14218 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Esling, P., Lejzerowicz, F., & Pawlowski, J.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-02-17
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2513-2524
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2150228362
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accurate multiplexing and filtering for high-throughput amplicon-sequencing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkv107
- The paper
- Esling, P., Lejzerowicz, F., & Pawlowski, J. (2015). Accurate multiplexing and filtering for high-throughput amplicon-sequencing. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.