The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Re-evaluation of G-quadruplex propensity with G4Hunter
Open accessAbstract
Critical evidence for the biological relevance of G-quadruplexes (G4) has recently been obtained in seminal studies performed in a variety of organisms. Four-stranded G-quadruplex DNA structures are promising drug targets as these non-canonical structures appear to be involved in a number of key biological processes. Given the growing interest for G4, accurate tools to predict G-quadruplex propensity of a given DNA or RNA sequence are needed. Several algorithms such as Quadparser predict quadruplex forming propensity. However, a number of studies have established that sequences that are not detected by these tools do form G4 structures (false negatives) and that other sequences predicted to form G4 structures do not (false positives). Here we report development and testing of a radically different algorithm, G4Hunter that takes into account G-richness and G-skewness of a given sequence and gives a quadruplex propensity score as output. To validate this model, we tested it on a large dataset of 392 published sequences and experimentally evaluated quadruplex forming potential of 209 sequences using a combination of biophysical methods to assess quadruplex formation in vitro. We experimentally validated the G4Hunter algorithm on a short complete genome, that of the human mitochondria (16.6 kb), because of its relatively high GC content and GC skewness as well as the biological relevance of these quadruplexes near instability hotspots. We then applied the algorithm to genomes of a number of species, including humans, allowing us to conclude that the number of sequences capable of forming stable quadruplexes (at least in vitro) in the human genome is significantly higher, by a factor of 2-10, than previously thought.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Small-molecule–induced DNA damage identifies alternative DNA structures in human genes
Rodriguez, R., Miller, K. M., Forment, J. V., Bradshaw, C. R., Nikan, M., Britton, S., Oelschlaegel, T., Xhemalce, B., Balasubramanian, S., & Jackson, S. P. (2012) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.780 · Cited by 741
Paeschke, K., Capra, J. A., & Zakian, V. A. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.04.015 · Cited by 566
Cited by
The Structure and Function of DNA G-Quadruplexes
Spiegel, J., Adhikari, S., & Balasubramanian, S. (2020) · Trends in Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trechm.2019.07.002 · Cited by 920
METTL1 Promotes let-7 MicroRNA Processing via m7G Methylation
Pandolfini, L., Barbieri, I., Bannister, A. J., Hendrick, A., Andrews, B., Webster, N., Murat, P., Mach, P., Brandi, R., Robson, S. C., et al. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.03.040 · Cited by 491
Lago, S., Nadai, M., Cernilogar, F. M., Kazerani, M., Domíniguez Moreno, H., Schotta, G., & Richter, S. N. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24198-2 · Cited by 269
Zhu, Y., Liu, X., Ding, X., Wang, F., & Geng, X. (2019) · Biogerontology · doi:10.1007/s10522-018-9769-1 · Cited by 255
Poetsch, A. R., Boulton, S. J., & Luscombe, N. M. (2018) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1582-2 · Cited by 132
Metadata
- Authors
- Bedrat, A., Lacroix, L., & Mergny, J.-L.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-01-20
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1746-1759
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2290989326
- Cited by
- 687
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 25.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Re-evaluation of G-quadruplex propensity with G4Hunter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkw006
- The paper
- Bedrat, A., Lacroix, L., & Mergny, J.-L. (2016). Re-evaluation of G-quadruplex propensity with G4Hunter. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.