The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alignment-free $d_2^*$ oligonucleotide frequency dissimilarity measure improves prediction of hosts from metagenomically-derived viral sequences
Open accessAbstract
Viruses and their host genomes often share similar oligonucleotide frequency (ONF) patterns, which can be used to predict the host of a given virus by finding the host with the greatest ONF similarity. We comprehensively compared 11 ONF metrics using several k-mer lengths for predicting host taxonomy from among ∼32 000 prokaryotic genomes for 1427 virus isolate genomes whose true hosts are known. The background-subtracting measure $d_2^*$ at k = 6 gave the highest host prediction accuracy (33%, genus level) with reasonable computational times. Requiring a maximum dissimilarity score for making predictions (thresholding) and taking the consensus of the 30 most similar hosts further improved accuracy. Using a previous dataset of 820 bacteriophage and 2699 bacterial genomes, $d_2^*$ host prediction accuracies with thresholding and consensus methods (genus-level: 64%) exceeded previous Euclidian distance ONF (32%) or homology-based (22-62%) methods. When applied to metagenomically-assembled marine SUP05 viruses and the human gut virus crAssphage, $d_2^*$-based predictions overlapped (i.e. some same, some different) with the previously inferred hosts of these viruses. The extent of overlap improved when only using host genomes or metagenomic contigs from the same habitat or samples as the query viruses. The $d_2^*$ ONF method will greatly improve the characterization of novel, metagenomic viruses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breitbart, M. (2012) · Annual Review of Marine Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-120709-142805 · Cited by 607
Santoro, A. E., Dupont, C. L., Richter, R. A., Craig, M. T., Carini, P., McIlvin, M. R., Yang, Y., Orsi, W. D., Moran, D. M., & Saito, M. A. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1416223112 · Cited by 268
Cited by
Trends in GPCR drug discovery: new agents, targets and indications
Hauser, A. S., Attwood, M. M., Rask-Andersen, M., Schiöth, H. B., & Gloriam, D. E. (2017) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2017.178 · Cited by 2,627
Kieft, K., Zhou, Z., & Anantharaman, K. (2020) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-020-00867-0 · Cited by 1,123
Minimum Information about an Uncultivated Virus Genome (MIUViG)
Roux, S., Adriaenssens, E. M., Dutilh, B. E., Koonin, E. V., Kropinski, A. M., Krupovic, M., Kuhn, J. H., Lavigne, R., Brister, J. R., Varsani, A., et al. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4306 · Cited by 732
Self-citationIdentifying viruses from metagenomic data using deep learning
Ren, J., Song, K., Deng, C., Ahlgren, N. A., Fuhrman, J. A., Li, Y., Xie, X., Poplin, R., & Sun, F. (2020) · Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1007/s40484-019-0187-4 · Cited by 659
Self-citationRoux, S., Camargo, A. P., Coutinho, F. H., Dabdoub, S. M., Dutilh, B. E., Nayfach, S., & Tritt, A. (2023) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002083 · Cited by 466
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahlgren, N. A., Ren, J., Lu, Y. Y., Fuhrman, J. A., & Sun, F.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-11-28
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-53
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2559100382
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alignment-free $d_2^*$ oligonucleotide frequency dissimilarity measure improves prediction of hosts from metagenomically-derived viral sequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkw1002
- The paper
- Ahlgren, N. A., Ren, J., Lu, Y. Y., Fuhrman, J. A., & Sun, F. (2017). Alignment-free $d_2^*$ oligonucleotide frequency dissimilarity measure improves prediction of hosts from metagenomically-derived viral sequences. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.