Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,657

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improvements to PATRIC, the all-bacterial Bioinformatics Database and Analysis Resource Center

Open access
Wattam, Alice R., Davis, James J., Assaf, Rida, Boisvert, Sébastien, Brettin, Thomas, Bun, Christopher, Conrad, Neal, Dietrich, Emily M., Disz, Terry, Gabbard, Joseph L., Gerdes, Svetlana, Henry, Christopher S., Kenyon, Ronald W., Machi, Dustin, Mao, Chunhong, Nordberg, Eric K., Olsen, Gary J., Murphy-Olson, Daniel E., Olson, Robert, Overbeek, Ross, Parrello, Bruce, Pusch, Gordon D., Shukla, Maulik, Vonstein, Veronika, Warren, Andrew, Xia, Fangfang, Yoo, Hyunseung, Stevens, Rick L.·2017·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

The Pathosystems Resource Integration Center (PATRIC) is the bacterial Bioinformatics Resource Center (https://www.patricbrc.org). Recent changes to PATRIC include a redesign of the web interface and some new services that provide users with a platform that takes them from raw reads to an integrated analysis experience. The redesigned interface allows researchers direct access to tools and data, and the emphasis has changed to user-created genome-groups, with detailed summaries and views of the data that researchers have selected. Perhaps the biggest change has been the enhanced capability for researchers to analyze their private data and compare it to the available public data. Researchers can assemble their raw sequence reads and annotate the contigs using RASTtk. PATRIC also provides services for RNA-Seq, variation, model reconstruction and differential expression analysis, all delivered through an updated private workspace. Private data can be compared by 'virtual integration' to any of PATRIC's public data. The number of genomes available for comparison in PATRIC has expanded to over 80 000, with a special emphasis on genomes with antimicrobial resistance data. PATRIC uses this data to improve both subsystem annotation and k-mer classification, and tags new genomes as having signatures that indicate susceptibility or resistance to specific antibiotics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkw1017

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 1,657

Metadata

Authors
Wattam, A. R., Davis, J. J., Assaf, R., Boisvert, S., Brettin, T., Bun, C., Conrad, N., Dietrich, E. M., Disz, T., Gabbard, J. L., Gerdes, S., Henry, C. S., Kenyon, R. W., Machi, D., Mao, C., Nordberg, E. K., Olsen, G. J., Murphy-Olson, D. E., Olson, R., Overbeek, R., Parrello, B., Pusch, G. D., Shukla, M., Vonstein, V., Warren, A., Xia, F., Yoo, H., & Stevens, R. L.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2016-11-29
Volume
45
Issue
D1
Pages
D535-D542
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2559133556
Cited by
1,657
References
8
FWCI
55.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improvements to PATRIC, the all-bacterial Bioinformatics Database and Analysis Resource Center. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkw1017
The paper
Wattam, A. R., Davis, J. J., Assaf, R., Boisvert, S., Brettin, T., Bun, C., Conrad, N., Dietrich, E. M., Disz, T., Gabbard, J. L., Gerdes, S., Henry, C. S., Kenyon, R. W., Machi, D., Mao, C., Nordberg, E. K., Olsen, G. J., Murphy-Olson, D. E., Olson, R., . . . Stevens, R. L. (2017). Improvements to PATRIC, the all-bacterial Bioinformatics Database and Analysis Resource Center. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1017

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.