The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Personalized characterization of diseases using sample-specific networks
Open accessAbstract
A complex disease generally results not from malfunction of individual molecules but from dysfunction of the relevant system or network, which dynamically changes with time and conditions. Thus, estimating a condition-specific network from a single sample is crucial to elucidating the molecular mechanisms of complex diseases at the system level. However, there is currently no effective way to construct such an individual-specific network by expression profiling of a single sample because of the requirement of multiple samples for computing correlations. We developed here with a statistical method, i.e. a sample-specific network (SSN) method, which allows us to construct individual-specific networks based on molecular expressions of a single sample. Using this method, we can characterize various human diseases at a network level. In particular, such SSNs can lead to the identification of individual-specific disease modules as well as driver genes, even without gene sequencing information. Extensive analysis by using the Cancer Genome Atlas data not only demonstrated the effectiveness of the method, but also found new individual-specific driver genes and network patterns for various types of cancer. Biological experiments on drug resistance further validated one important advantage of our method over the traditional methods, i.e. we can even identify such drug resistance genes that actually have no clear differential expression between samples with and without the resistance, due to the additional network information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cerami, E., Gao, J., Dogrusoz, U., Gross, B. E., Sumer, S. O., Aksoy, B. A., Jacobsen, A., Byrne, C. J., Heuer, M. L., Larsson, E., et al. (2012) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-12-0095 · Cited by 17,455
Siegel, R., Ma, J., Zou, Z., & Jemal, A. (2014) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21208 · Cited by 11,499
Gefitinib or Carboplatin–Paclitaxel in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma
Mok, T. S., Wu, Y.-L., Thongprasert, S., Yang, C.-H., Chu, D.-T., Saijo, N., Sunpaweravong, P., Han, B., Margono, B., Ichinose, Y., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0810699 · Cited by 8,261
Vogelstein, B., Papadopoulos, N., Velculescu, V. E., Zhou, S., Diaz, L. A., & Kinzler, K. W. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1235122 · Cited by 7,863
Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma of the Colon: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
Park, P. Y., Goldin, T., Chang, J., Markman, M., & Kundranda, M. N. (2015) · Case Reports in Oncology · doi:10.1159/000441772 · Cited by 5,273
Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease
Barabási, A.-L., Gulbahce, N., & Loscalzo, J. (2011) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2918 · Cited by 5,034
Stratton, M. R., Campbell, P. J., & Futreal, P. A. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07943 · Cited by 3,449
Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis
Rabinowitz, L. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1989.10488573 · Cited by 3,116
Gefitinib-Sensitizing EGFR Mutations in Lung Cancer Activate Anti-Apoptotic Pathways
Sordella, R., Bell, D. W., Haber, D. A., & Settleman, J. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1101637 · Cited by 1,606
Novel Molecular Subtypes of Serous and Endometrioid Ovarian Cancer Linked to Clinical Outcome
Tothill, R. W., Tinker, A. V., George, J., Brown, R., Fox, S. B., Lade, S., Johnson, D. S., Trivett, M. K., Etemadmoghadam, D., Locandro, B., et al. (2008) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-0196 · Cited by 1,467
Cited by
Network analysis methods for studying microbial communities: A mini review
Matchado, M. S., Lauber, M., Reitmeier, S., Kacprowski, T., Baumbach, J., Haller, D., & List, M. (2021) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2021.05.001 · Cited by 357
Spearheading future omics analyses using dyngen, a multi-modal simulator of single cells
Cannoodt, R., Saelens, W., Deconinck, L., & Saeys, Y. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24152-2 · Cited by 124
Biomedical data, computational methods and tools for evaluating disease–disease associations
Xiang, J., Zhang, J., Zhao, Y., Wu, F.-X., & Li, M. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac006 · Cited by 49
Network control principles for identifying personalized driver genes in cancer
Guo, W.-F., Zhang, S.-W., Zeng, T., Akutsu, T., & Chen, L. (2020) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbz089 · Cited by 44
Self-citationLiang, J., Li, Z.-W., Yue, C.-T., Hu, Z., Cheng, H., Liu, Z.-X., & Guo, W.-F. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac254 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, X., Wang, Y., Ji, H., Aihara, K., & Chen, L.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-09-04
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- e164-e164
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2508622936
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 10.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Personalized characterization of diseases using sample-specific networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkw772
- The paper
- Liu, X., Wang, Y., Ji, H., Aihara, K., & Chen, L. (2016). Personalized characterization of diseases using sample-specific networks. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw772
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
