The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
agriGO v2.0: a GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community, 2017 update
Open accessAbstract
The agriGO platform, which has been serving the scientific community for >10 years, specifically focuses on gene ontology (GO) enrichment analyses of plant and agricultural species. We continuously maintain and update the databases and accommodate the various requests of our global users. Here, we present our updated agriGO that has a largely expanded number of supporting species (394) and datatypes (865). In addition, a larger number of species have been classified into groups covering crops, vegetables, fish, birds and insects closely related to the agricultural community. We further improved the computational efficiency, including the batch analysis and P-value distribution (PVD), and the user-friendliness of the web pages. More visualization features were added to the platform, including SEACOMPARE (cross comparison of singular enrichment analysis), direct acyclic graph (DAG) and Scatter Plots, which can be merged by choosing any significant GO term. The updated platform agriGO v2.0 is now publicly accessible at http://systemsbiology.cau.edu.cn/agriGOv2/.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources
Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T., & Lempicki, R. A. (2009) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2008.211 · Cited by 35,890
A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure
(1979) · Scandinavian Journal of Statistics · doi:10.2307/4615733 · Cited by 21,526
Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T., & Lempicki, R. A. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn923 · Cited by 14,108
Conesa, A., Götz, S., García-Gómez, J. M., Terol, J., Talón, M., & Robles, M. (2005) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti610 · Cited by 11,495
The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency
Benjamini, Y., & Yekutieli, D. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013699998 · Cited by 10,490
Enrichr: interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool
Chen, E. Y., Tan, C. M., Kou, Y., Duan, Q., Wang, Z., Meirelles, G. V., Clark, N. R., & Ma’ayan, A. (2013) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-128 · Cited by 7,814
UniProt: the Universal Protein knowledgebase
Apweiler, R. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh131 · Cited by 7,498
The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future
Finn, R. D., Coggill, P., Eberhardt, R. Y., Eddy, S. R., Mistry, J., Mitchell, A. L., Potter, S. C., Punta, M., Qureshi, M., Sangrador-Vegas, A., et al. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1344 · Cited by 5,975
Phytozome: a comparative platform for green plant genomics
Goodstein, D. M., Shu, S., Howson, R., Neupane, R., Hayes, R. D., Fazo, J., Mitros, T., Dirks, W., Hellsten, U., Putnam, N., et al. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr944 · Cited by 5,420
Cited by
Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets
Zhou, Y., Zhou, B., Pache, L., Chang, M., Khodabakhshi, A. H., Tanaseichuk, O., Benner, C., & Chanda, S. K. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09234-6 · Cited by 14,611
Raudvere, U., Kolberg, L., Kuzmin, I., Arak, T., Adler, P., Peterson, H., & Vilo, J. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz369 · Cited by 5,045
De novo assembly, annotation, and comparative analysis of 26 diverse maize genomes
Hufford, M. B., Seetharam, A. S., Woodhouse, M. R., Chougule, K. M., Ou, S., Liu, J., Ricci, W. A., Guo, T., Olson, A., Qiu, Y., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abg5289 · Cited by 747
Yang, T., Liu, R., Luo, Y., Hu, S., Wang, D., Wang, C., Pandey, M. K., Ge, S., Xu, Q., Li, N., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01172-2 · Cited by 191
Self-citationXie (2021) · doi:10.1111/jipb.13161 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Tian, T., Liu, Y., Yan, H., You, Q., Yi, X., Du, Z., Xu, W., & Su, Z.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-05-04
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- W1
- Pages
- W122-W129
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2611604995
- Cited by
- 2,318
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 67.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: agriGO v2.0: a GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community, 2017 update. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkx382
- The paper
- Tian, T., Liu, Y., Yan, H., You, Q., Yi, X., Du, Z., Xu, W., & Su, Z. (2017). agriGO v2.0: a GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community, 2017 update. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx382
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
