The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
dbPTM in 2019: exploring disease association and cross-talk of post-translational modifications
Open accessAbstract
The dbPTM (http://dbPTM.mbc.nctu.edu.tw/) has been maintained for over 10 years with the aim to provide functional and structural analyses for post-translational modifications (PTMs). In this update, dbPTM not only integrates more experimentally validated PTMs from available databases and through manual curation of literature but also provides PTM-disease associations based on non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs). The high-throughput deep sequencing technology has led to a surge in the data generated through analysis of association between SNPs and diseases, both in terms of growth amount and scope. This update thus integrated disease-associated nsSNPs from dbSNP based on genome-wide association studies. The PTM substrate sites located at a specified distance in terms of the amino acids encoded from nsSNPs were deemed to have an association with the involved diseases. In recent years, increasing evidence for crosstalk between PTMs has been reported. Although mass spectrometry-based proteomics has substantially improved our knowledge about substrate site specificity of single PTMs, the fact that the crosstalk of combinatorial PTMs may act in concert with the regulation of protein function and activity is neglected. Because of the relatively limited information about concurrent frequency and functional relevance of PTM crosstalk, in this update, the PTM sites neighboring other PTM sites in a specified window length were subjected to motif discovery and functional enrichment analysis. This update highlights the current challenges in PTM crosstalk investigation and breaks the bottleneck of how proteomics may contribute to understanding PTM codes, revealing the next level of data complexity and proteomic limitation in prospective PTM research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wu, S., & Chiang, C. (2009) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2009.83 · Cited by 125
Cited by
Post-translational modifications in proteins: resources, tools and prediction methods
Ramazi, S., & Zahiri, J. (2021) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/baab012 · Cited by 772
Zhong, Q., Xiao, X., Qiu, Y., Xu, Z., Chen, C., Chong, B., Zhao, X., Hai, S., Li, S., An, Z., et al. (2023) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.261 · Cited by 442
Yuan, Y., Wang, C., Zhuang, X., Lin, S., Luo, M., Deng, W., Zhou, J., Liu, L., Mao, L., Peng, W., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32976-9 · Cited by 16
Pathogenic variations illuminate functional constraints in intrinsically disordered proteins
(2026) · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.115215 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, K.-Y., Lee, T.-Y., Kao, H.-J., Ma, C.-T., Lee, C.-C., Lin, T.-H., Chang, W.-C., & Huang, H.-D.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-11-10
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- D1
- Pages
- D298-D308
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2900206619
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: dbPTM in 2019: exploring disease association and cross-talk of post-translational modifications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gky1074
- The paper
- Huang, K.-Y., Lee, T.-Y., Kao, H.-J., Ma, C.-T., Lee, C.-C., Lin, T.-H., Chang, W.-C., & Huang, H.-D. (2019). dbPTM in 2019: exploring disease association and cross-talk of post-translational modifications. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1074
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.