Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CHETAH: a selective, hierarchical cell type identification method for single-cell RNA sequencing

Open access
de Kanter, Jurrian K, Lijnzaad, Philip, Candelli, Tito, Margaritis, Thanasis, Holstege, Frank C P·2019·Nucleic Acids Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Cell type identification is essential for single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) studies, currently transforming the life sciences. CHETAH (CHaracterization of cEll Types Aided by Hierarchical classification) is an accurate cell type identification algorithm that is rapid and selective, including the possibility of intermediate or unassigned categories. Evidence for assignment is based on a classification tree of previously available scRNA-seq reference data and includes a confidence score based on the variance in gene expression per cell type. For cell types represented in the reference data, CHETAH’s accuracy is as good as existing methods. Its specificity is superior when cells of an unknown type are encountered, such as malignant cells in tumor samples which it pinpoints as intermediate or unassigned. Although designed for tumor samples in particular, the use of unassigned and intermediate types is also valuable in other exploratory studies. This is exemplified in pancreas datasets where CHETAH highlights cell populations not well represented in the reference dataset, including cells with profiles that lie on a continuum between that of acinar and ductal cell types. Having the possibility of unassigned and intermediate cell types is pivotal for preventing misclassification and can yield important biological information for previously unexplored tissues.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkz543

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 64 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Athwal, 2014, Expression of human cationic trypsinogen (PRSS1) in murine acinar cells promotes pancreatitis and apoptotic cell death, Cell Death Dis., 5, e1165, 10.1038/cddis.2014.120 · doi:10.1038/cddis.2014.120
  2. Askan, 2016, Expression of markers of hepatocellular differentiation in pancreatic acinar cell neoplasms A potential diagnostic pitfall, Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 146, 163, 10.1093/ajcp/aqw096 · doi:10.1093/ajcp/aqw096

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
de Kanter, J. K., Lijnzaad, P., Candelli, T., Margaritis, T., & Holstege, F. C. P.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2019-06-21
Volume
47
Issue
16
Pages
e95-e95
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2951914955
Cited by
285
References
64
FWCI
9.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
European Research Council (671174)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CHETAH: a selective, hierarchical cell type identification method for single-cell RNA sequencing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gkz543
The paper
de Kanter, J. K., Lijnzaad, P., Candelli, T., Margaritis, T., & Holstege, F. C. P. (2019). CHETAH: a selective, hierarchical cell type identification method for single-cell RNA sequencing. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz543

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.