The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Relative quantification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification
Open accessAbstract
We describe a new method for relative quantification of 40 different DNA sequences in an easy to perform reaction requiring only 20 ng of human DNA. Applications shown of this multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique include the detection of exon deletions and duplications in the human BRCA1, MSH2 and MLH1 genes, detection of trisomies such as Down's syndrome, characterisation of chromosomal aberrations in cell lines and tumour samples and SNP/mutation detection. Relative quantification of mRNAs by MLPA will be described elsewhere. In MLPA, not sample nucleic acids but probes added to the samples are amplified and quantified. Amplification of probes by PCR depends on the presence of probe target sequences in the sample. Each probe consists of two oligonucleotides, one synthetic and one M13 derived, that hybridise to adjacent sites of the target sequence. Such hybridised probe oligonucleotides are ligated, permitting subsequent amplification. All ligated probes have identical end sequences, permitting simultaneous PCR amplification using only one primer pair. Each probe gives rise to an amplification product of unique size between 130 and 480 bp. Probe target sequences are small (50-70 nt). The prerequisite of a ligation reaction provides the opportunity to discriminate single nucleotide differences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
High-throughput droplet digital PCR system for absolute quantitation of DNA copy number
Hindson, B. J., Ness, K. D., Masquelier, D. A., Belgrader, P., Heredia, N. J., Makarewicz, A. J., Bright, I. J., Lucero, M. Y., Hiddessen, A. L., Legler, T. C., et al. (2011) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac202028g · Cited by 2,792
Genome structural variation discovery and genotyping
Alkan, C., Coe, B. P., & Eichler, E. E. (2011) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2958 · Cited by 1,630
Screening for the Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer)
Hampel, H., Frankel, W. L., Martin, E., Arnold, M., Khanduja, K., Kuebler, P., Nakagawa, H., Sotamaa, K., Prior, T. W., Westman, J., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa043146 · Cited by 1,408
Widespread occurrence of the JAK2 V617F mutation in chronic myeloproliferative disorders
Jones, A. V. (2005) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2005-03-1320 · Cited by 843
Diagnostic genome profiling in mental retardation
de Vries, B. B. A., Pfundt, R., Leisink, M., Koolen, D. A., Vissers, L. E. L. M., Janssen, I. M., Reijmersdal, S. V., Nillesen, W. M., Huys, E. H. L. P. G., Leeuw, N. D., et al. (2005) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/491719 · Cited by 605
Metadata
- Authors
- Schouten, J. P.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-06-15
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 57e-57
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2113926943
- Cited by
- 2,699
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relative quantification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/gnf056
- The paper
- Schouten, J. P. (2002). Relative quantification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gnf056
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.