Cited by 40RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsProtein Structure and DynamicsRNA regulation and disease

State-of-the-RNArt: benchmarking current methods for RNA 3D structure prediction

Open access
Bernard, Clément, Postic, Guillaume, Ghannay, Sahar, Tahi, Fariza·2024·NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

RNAs are essential molecules involved in numerous biological functions. Understanding RNA functions requires the knowledge of their 3D structures. Computational methods have been developed for over two decades to predict the 3D conformations from RNA sequences. These computational methods have been widely used and are usually categorised as either ab initio or template-based. The performances remain to be improved. Recently, the rise of deep learning has changed the sight of novel approaches. Deep learning methods are promising, but their adaptation to RNA 3D structure prediction remains difficult. In this paper, we give a brief review of the ab initio, template-based and novel deep learning approaches. We highlight the different available tools and provide a benchmark on nine methods using the RNA-Puzzles dataset. We provide an online dashboard that shows the predictions made by benchmarked methods, freely available on the EvryRNA platform: https://evryrna.ibisc.univ-evry.fr/evryrna/state_of_the_rnart/.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nargab/lqae048

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Bernard, C., Postic, G., Ghannay, S., & Tahi, F.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Université Paris-Saclay (FR)
Corresponding author
Tahi, Fariza
Venue
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
Published
2024-04-04
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
lqae048-lqae048
ISSN
2631-9268 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4396908238
Cited by
40
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 6
FWCI
5.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • GENCI (AD011014250)
  • Labex DigiCosme (ANR11LABEX0045DIGICOSME)
  • Investissement d’Avenir (ANR11IDEX000302)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
Keywords
RNA 3D structure prediction, benchmarking, ab initio prediction, template-based modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review