A comprehensive evaluation of self-attention for detecting regulatory feature interactions
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The successful use of deep learning in computational biology depends on the ability to extract meaningful biological information from the trained models. Recent work has demonstrated that the attention maps generated by self-attention layers can be interpreted to predict cooperativity between binding of transcription factors, a key feature of gene regulatory networks. We extend this earlier work and demonstrate that the addition of an entropy term yields high-precision sparse attention maps that are easy to interpret. Furthermore, we performed a comprehensive evaluation of the relative performance of different flavors of attention-based transcription factor cooperativity discovery. Our findings demonstrate the benefit of the entropy-enhanced attention models and provide additional insights that would enable practitioners to make effective use of this valuable tool for biological discovery.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Purhonen, J., Banerjee, R., McDonald, A. E., Fellman, V., & Kallijärvi, J. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa516 · Cited by 657 · see citing works
Jha, A., K. Aicher, J., R. Gazzara, M., Singh, D., & Barash, Y. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02055-7 · Cited by 93 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These include in silico mutagenesis [2] and gradient-based methods [10, 11].”
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Jabeen, S., & Ben-Hur, A.
- Affiliations
- Colorado State University (US)
- Department of Computer Science, Colorado State University , Fort Collins , CO 80521 ,
- Corresponding author
- Jabeen, Saira
- ORCID
- Ben-Hur, Asa
- Venue
- NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2026-01-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- lqaf209-lqaf209
- ISSN
- 2631-9268 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12770979
- OpenAlex
- W7118968264
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
- Biological and Environmental Research (DE-SC0024459)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- self-attention, attention maps, transcription factor cooperativity, gene regulatory networks, interpretability, binding site interactions
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Algorithms, Humans, Transcription Factors, Entropy, Computational Biology, Gene Regulatory Networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review