Cited by 93Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)RNA Research and SplicingMachine Learning in Healthcare

Enhanced integrated gradients: improving interpretability of deep learning models using splicing codes as a case study

Open access
Jha, Anupama, K. Aicher, Joseph, R. Gazzara, Matthew, Singh, Deependra, Barash, Yoseph·2020·Genome Biology

Abstract

Despite the success and fast adaptation of deep learning models in biomedical domains, their lack of interpretability remains an issue. Here, we introduce Enhanced Integrated Gradients (EIG), a method to identify significant features associated with a specific prediction task. Using RNA splicing prediction as well as digit classification as case studies, we demonstrate that EIG improves upon the original Integrated Gradients method and produces sets of informative features. We then apply EIG to identify A1CF as a key regulator of liver-specific alternative splicing, supporting this finding with subsequent analysis of relevant A1CF functional (RNA-seq) and binding data (PAR-CLIP).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13059-020-02055-7

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Jha et al. proposed the EIG method, which identified significant splicing code features in the liver and was adapted for identifying common transcriptional signatures of cancers.

    “Jha et al. proposed the enhanced integrated gradients (EIG) method [169], which identified significant splicing code features in the liver and was adapted for identifying common transcriptional signatures of cancers [170].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. [1]Zhou J Troyanskaya OG Predicting effects of noncoding variants with deep learning–based sequence model Nat Methods 2015 12 10 931 10.1038/nmeth.3547 26301843 PMC4768299 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2]Jha A Gazzara MR Barash Y Integrative deep models for alternative splicing Bioinformatics 2017 33 14 274 82 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx268 PMC5870723 28882000 · DOI
  3. [3]Guidotti R Monreale A Ruggieri S Turini F Giannotti F Pedreschi D A survey of methods for explaining black box models ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 2019 51 5 93 10.1145/3236009 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [5]Ribeiro MT, Singh S, Guestrin C. "Why should I trust you?": explaining the predictions of any classifier. 2016. http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1602.04938.
  5. [6]Koh PW, Liang P. Understanding black-box predictions via influence functions. 2017. http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1703.04730.
  6. [8]Sundararajan M, Taly A, Yan Q. Axiomatic attribution for deep networks. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 70: 2017. p. 3319–28.
  7. [9]Shrikumar A, Greenside P, Kundaje A. Learning important features through propagating activation differences. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 70: 2017. p. 3145–53.
  8. [11]Dror G Sorek R Shamir R Accurate identification of alternatively spliced exons using support vector machine Bioinformatics 2005 21 7 897 901 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti132 15531599 · DOI
  9. [13]Ule J Stefani G Mele A Ruggiu M Wang X Taneri B Gaasterland T Blencowe BJ Darnell RB An RNA map predicting Nova-dependent splicing regulation Nature 2006 444 7119 580 6 10.1038/nature05304 17065982 · DOI
  10. [14]Damianov A Ying Y Lin C-H Lee J-A Tran D Vashisht A Bahrami-Samani E Xing Y Martin K Wohlschlegel J Black D Rbfox proteins regulate splicing as part of a large multiprotein complex LASR Cell 2016 165 3 606 19 10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.040 27104978 PMC4841943 · DOI
  11. [15]Begg BE, Jens M, Wang PY, Burge CB. Secondary motifs enable concentration-dependent regulation by Rbfox family proteins. bioRxiv. 2019:840272. 10.1101/840272. · DOI
  12. [17]Vaquero-Garcia J Barrera A Gazzara MR Gonzalez-Vallinas J Lahens NF Hogenesch JB Lynch KW Barash Y A new view of transcriptome complexity and regulation through the lens of local splicing variations elife 2016 5 11752 10.7554/eLife.11752 PMC4801060 26829591 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [18]Barash Y Calarco JA Gao W Pan Q Wang X Shai O Blencowe BJ Frey BJ Deciphering the splicing code Nature 2010 465 7294 53 10.1038/nature09000 20445623 · DOI
  14. [19]Xiong HY Barash Y Frey BJ Bayesian prediction of tissue-regulated splicing using rna sequence and cellular context Bioinformatics 2011 27 18 2554 62 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr444 21803804 · DOI
  15. [21]Roweis ST Saul LK Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding Science 2000 290 5500 2323 6 10.1126/science.290.5500.2323 11125150 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [22]Wu M, Schölkopf B. A local learning approach for clustering. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems: 2007. p. 1529–1536.
  17. [23]Wang B Huang L Zhu Y Kundaje A Batzoglou S Goldenberg A Vicus: exploiting local structures to improve network-based analysis of biological data PLoS Comput Biol 2017 13 10 1005621 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005621 PMC5638230 29023470 · DOI
  18. [24]Chen J, Song L, Wainwright MJ, Jordan MI. Learning to explain: an information-theoretic perspective on model interpretation. 2018. arXiv: 1802.07814 [cs, stat]. Accessed 29 Mar 2019. · arXiv
  19. [25]Yeo G Holste D Kreiman G Burge CB Variation in alternative splicing across human tissues Genome Biol 2004 5 10 74 10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r74 PMC545594 15461793 · DOI · Paper page
  20. [26]Raj B Blencowe BJ Alternative splicing in the mammalian nervous system: recent insights into mechanisms and functional roles Neuron 2015 87 1 14 27 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.004 26139367 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [27]Baralle FE Giudice J Alternative splicing as a regulator of development and tissue identity Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2017 18 7 437 10.1038/nrm.2017.27 28488700 PMC6839889 · DOI · Paper page
  22. [28]Gupta S Stamatoyannopoulos JA Bailey TL Noble WS Quantifying similarity between motifs Genome Biol 2007 8 2 24 10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r24 PMC1852410 17324271 · DOI · Paper page
  23. [30]Blanc V Xie Y Kennedy S Riordan JD Rubin DC Madison BB Mills JC Nadeau JH Davidson NO Apobec1 complementation factor (a1cf) and rbm47 interact in tissue-specific regulation of c to u rna editing in mouse intestine and liver Rna 2019 25 1 70 81 10.1261/rna.068395.118 30309881 PMC6298562 · DOI
  24. [31]Han SP Tang YH Smith R Functional diversity of the hnrnps: past, present and perspectives Biochem J 2010 430 3 379 92 10.1042/BJ20100396 20795951 · DOI
  25. [32]Nikolaou KC Vatandaslar H Meyer C Schmid MW Tuschl T Stoffel M The RNA-binding protein a1cf regulates hepatic fructose and glycerol metabolism via alternative RNA splicing Cell Rep 2019 29 2 283 300 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.100 31597092 · DOI
  26. [34]Dominguez D Freese P Alexis MS Su A Hochman M Palden T Bazile C Lambert NJ Van Nostrand EL Pratt GA Sequence, structure, and context preferences of human RNA binding proteins Mol Cell 2018 70 5 854 67 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.05.001 29883606 PMC6062212 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [35]Shah A Qian Y Weyn-Vanhentenryck SM Zhang C Clip tool kit (ctk): a flexible and robust pipeline to analyze clip sequencing data Bioinformatics 2016 33 4 566 7 PMC6041811 27797762
  28. [36]Hafner M Landthaler M Burger L Khorshid M Hausser J Berninger P Rothballer A Ascano Jr M Jungkamp A-C Munschauer M Transcriptome-wide identification of rna-binding protein and microrna target sites by par-clip Cell 2010 141 1 129 41 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.009 20371350 PMC2861495 · DOI · Paper page
  29. [37]Ching T Himmelstein DS Beaulieu-Jones BK Kalinin AA Do BT Way GP Ferrero E Agapow P-M Zietz M Hoffman MM Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine J R Soc Interface 2018 15 141 20170387 10.1098/rsif.2017.0387 29618526 PMC5938574 · DOI · Paper page
  30. [38]Phuycharoen M, Zarrineh P, Bridoux L, Amin S, Losa M, Chen K, Bobola N, Rattray M. Uncovering tissue-specific binding features from differential deep learning. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020. 10.1093/nar/gkaa009. PMC7049686 31974574 · DOI
  31. [39]Barash Y Vaquero-Garcia J González-Vallinas J Xiong HY Gao W Lee LJ Frey BJ Avispa: a web tool for the prediction and analysis of alternative splicing Genome Biol 2013 14 10 114 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r114 24156756 PMC4014802 · DOI
  32. [40]Li H Durbin R Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform Bioinformatics 2009 25 14 1754 60 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 19451168 PMC2705234 · DOI · Paper page
  33. [42]Nikolaou. Differential splicing analysis of liver-specific A1cf knock-out mice. 2019. http://arxiv.org/abs/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA530736.
  34. [43]Nikolaou. PAR-CLIP of A1cf in mouse liver. 2019. http://arxiv.org/abs/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA531626.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jha, A., K. Aicher, J., R. Gazzara, M., Singh, D., & Barash, Y.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Barash, Yoseph
Venue
Genome Biology
Published
2020-06-19
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
149-149
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W3036652698
Cited by
93
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG046544)
  • National Cancer Institute (U01CA232563)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM128096)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (F30HD098803)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
integrated gradients, explainable AI, deep learning interpretability, alternative splicing, A1CF, PAR-CLIP, protein-DNA interactions, digit classification, feature attribution
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Animals, Liver, RNA Splicing, Mice, Knockout, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review