Enhanced integrated gradients: improving interpretability of deep learning models using splicing codes as a case study
Open accessAbstract
Despite the success and fast adaptation of deep learning models in biomedical domains, their lack of interpretability remains an issue. Here, we introduce Enhanced Integrated Gradients (EIG), a method to identify significant features associated with a specific prediction task. Using RNA splicing prediction as well as digit classification as case studies, we demonstrate that EIG improves upon the original Integrated Gradients method and produces sets of informative features. We then apply EIG to identify A1CF as a key regulator of liver-specific alternative splicing, supporting this finding with subsequent analysis of relevant A1CF functional (RNA-seq) and binding data (PAR-CLIP).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Jha et al. proposed the EIG method, which identified significant splicing code features in the liver and was adapted for identifying common transcriptional signatures of cancers.
“Jha et al. proposed the enhanced integrated gradients (EIG) method [169], which identified significant splicing code features in the liver and was adapted for identifying common transcriptional signatures of cancers [170].”
From Challenges in AI-driven Biomedical Multimodal Data Fusion and Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [169]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions
Lundberg, S., & Lee, S.-I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.07874 · Cited by 23,707 · see citing works
The mythos of model interpretability
Lipton, Z. C. (2018) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3233231 · Cited by 5,427 · see citing works
Mouse genomic variation and its effect on phenotypes and gene regulation.
Keane, T. M., Goodstadt, L., Danecek, P., White, M. A., Wong, K., Yalcin, B., Heger, A., Agam, A., Slater, G., Goodson, M., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10413 · Cited by 1,580 · see citing works
A compendium of RNA-binding motifs for decoding gene regulation
Ray, D., Kazan, H., Cook, K. B., Weirauch, M. T., Najafabadi, H. S., Li, X., Gueroussov, S., Albu, M., Zheng, H., Yang, A., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12311 · Cited by 1,480 · see citing works
Context-dependent control of alternative splicing by RNA-binding proteins
Fu, X.-D., & Ares, M. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3778 · Cited by 1,044 · see citing works
Neuronal regulation of alternative pre-mRNA splicing
Li, Q., Lee, J.-A., & Black, D. L. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2237 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- [1]Zhou J Troyanskaya OG Predicting effects of noncoding variants with deep learning–based sequence model Nat Methods 2015 12 10 931 10.1038/nmeth.3547 26301843 PMC4768299 · DOI · Paper page
- [2]Jha A Gazzara MR Barash Y Integrative deep models for alternative splicing Bioinformatics 2017 33 14 274 82 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx268 PMC5870723 28882000 · DOI
- [3]Guidotti R Monreale A Ruggieri S Turini F Giannotti F Pedreschi D A survey of methods for explaining black box models ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 2019 51 5 93 10.1145/3236009 · DOI · Paper page
- [5]Ribeiro MT, Singh S, Guestrin C. "Why should I trust you?": explaining the predictions of any classifier. 2016. http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1602.04938.
- [6]Koh PW, Liang P. Understanding black-box predictions via influence functions. 2017. http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1703.04730.
- [8]Sundararajan M, Taly A, Yan Q. Axiomatic attribution for deep networks. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 70: 2017. p. 3319–28.
- [9]Shrikumar A, Greenside P, Kundaje A. Learning important features through propagating activation differences. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 70: 2017. p. 3145–53.
- [11]Dror G Sorek R Shamir R Accurate identification of alternatively spliced exons using support vector machine Bioinformatics 2005 21 7 897 901 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti132 15531599 · DOI
- [13]Ule J Stefani G Mele A Ruggiu M Wang X Taneri B Gaasterland T Blencowe BJ Darnell RB An RNA map predicting Nova-dependent splicing regulation Nature 2006 444 7119 580 6 10.1038/nature05304 17065982 · DOI
- [14]Damianov A Ying Y Lin C-H Lee J-A Tran D Vashisht A Bahrami-Samani E Xing Y Martin K Wohlschlegel J Black D Rbfox proteins regulate splicing as part of a large multiprotein complex LASR Cell 2016 165 3 606 19 10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.040 27104978 PMC4841943 · DOI
- [15]Begg BE, Jens M, Wang PY, Burge CB. Secondary motifs enable concentration-dependent regulation by Rbfox family proteins. bioRxiv. 2019:840272. 10.1101/840272. · DOI
- [17]Vaquero-Garcia J Barrera A Gazzara MR Gonzalez-Vallinas J Lahens NF Hogenesch JB Lynch KW Barash Y A new view of transcriptome complexity and regulation through the lens of local splicing variations elife 2016 5 11752 10.7554/eLife.11752 PMC4801060 26829591 · DOI · Paper page
- [18]Barash Y Calarco JA Gao W Pan Q Wang X Shai O Blencowe BJ Frey BJ Deciphering the splicing code Nature 2010 465 7294 53 10.1038/nature09000 20445623 · DOI
- [19]Xiong HY Barash Y Frey BJ Bayesian prediction of tissue-regulated splicing using rna sequence and cellular context Bioinformatics 2011 27 18 2554 62 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr444 21803804 · DOI
- [21]Roweis ST Saul LK Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding Science 2000 290 5500 2323 6 10.1126/science.290.5500.2323 11125150 · DOI · Paper page
- [22]Wu M, Schölkopf B. A local learning approach for clustering. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems: 2007. p. 1529–1536.
- [23]Wang B Huang L Zhu Y Kundaje A Batzoglou S Goldenberg A Vicus: exploiting local structures to improve network-based analysis of biological data PLoS Comput Biol 2017 13 10 1005621 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005621 PMC5638230 29023470 · DOI
- [24]Chen J, Song L, Wainwright MJ, Jordan MI. Learning to explain: an information-theoretic perspective on model interpretation. 2018. arXiv: 1802.07814 [cs, stat]. Accessed 29 Mar 2019. · arXiv
- [25]Yeo G Holste D Kreiman G Burge CB Variation in alternative splicing across human tissues Genome Biol 2004 5 10 74 10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r74 PMC545594 15461793 · DOI · Paper page
- [26]Raj B Blencowe BJ Alternative splicing in the mammalian nervous system: recent insights into mechanisms and functional roles Neuron 2015 87 1 14 27 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.004 26139367 · DOI · Paper page
- [27]Baralle FE Giudice J Alternative splicing as a regulator of development and tissue identity Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2017 18 7 437 10.1038/nrm.2017.27 28488700 PMC6839889 · DOI · Paper page
- [28]Gupta S Stamatoyannopoulos JA Bailey TL Noble WS Quantifying similarity between motifs Genome Biol 2007 8 2 24 10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r24 PMC1852410 17324271 · DOI · Paper page
- [30]Blanc V Xie Y Kennedy S Riordan JD Rubin DC Madison BB Mills JC Nadeau JH Davidson NO Apobec1 complementation factor (a1cf) and rbm47 interact in tissue-specific regulation of c to u rna editing in mouse intestine and liver Rna 2019 25 1 70 81 10.1261/rna.068395.118 30309881 PMC6298562 · DOI
- [31]Han SP Tang YH Smith R Functional diversity of the hnrnps: past, present and perspectives Biochem J 2010 430 3 379 92 10.1042/BJ20100396 20795951 · DOI
- [32]Nikolaou KC Vatandaslar H Meyer C Schmid MW Tuschl T Stoffel M The RNA-binding protein a1cf regulates hepatic fructose and glycerol metabolism via alternative RNA splicing Cell Rep 2019 29 2 283 300 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.100 31597092 · DOI
- [34]Dominguez D Freese P Alexis MS Su A Hochman M Palden T Bazile C Lambert NJ Van Nostrand EL Pratt GA Sequence, structure, and context preferences of human RNA binding proteins Mol Cell 2018 70 5 854 67 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.05.001 29883606 PMC6062212 · DOI · Paper page
- [35]Shah A Qian Y Weyn-Vanhentenryck SM Zhang C Clip tool kit (ctk): a flexible and robust pipeline to analyze clip sequencing data Bioinformatics 2016 33 4 566 7 PMC6041811 27797762
- [36]Hafner M Landthaler M Burger L Khorshid M Hausser J Berninger P Rothballer A Ascano Jr M Jungkamp A-C Munschauer M Transcriptome-wide identification of rna-binding protein and microrna target sites by par-clip Cell 2010 141 1 129 41 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.009 20371350 PMC2861495 · DOI · Paper page
- [37]Ching T Himmelstein DS Beaulieu-Jones BK Kalinin AA Do BT Way GP Ferrero E Agapow P-M Zietz M Hoffman MM Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine J R Soc Interface 2018 15 141 20170387 10.1098/rsif.2017.0387 29618526 PMC5938574 · DOI · Paper page
- [38]Phuycharoen M, Zarrineh P, Bridoux L, Amin S, Losa M, Chen K, Bobola N, Rattray M. Uncovering tissue-specific binding features from differential deep learning. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020. 10.1093/nar/gkaa009. PMC7049686 31974574 · DOI
- [39]Barash Y Vaquero-Garcia J González-Vallinas J Xiong HY Gao W Lee LJ Frey BJ Avispa: a web tool for the prediction and analysis of alternative splicing Genome Biol 2013 14 10 114 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r114 24156756 PMC4014802 · DOI
- [40]Li H Durbin R Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform Bioinformatics 2009 25 14 1754 60 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 19451168 PMC2705234 · DOI · Paper page
- [42]Nikolaou. Differential splicing analysis of liver-specific A1cf knock-out mice. 2019. http://arxiv.org/abs/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA530736.
- [43]Nikolaou. PAR-CLIP of A1cf in mouse liver. 2019. http://arxiv.org/abs/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA531626.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Obtaining genetics insights from deep learning via explainable artificial intelligence
Novakovsky, G., Dexter, N., Libbrecht, M. W., Wasserman, W. W., & Mostafavi, S. (2022) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-022-00532-2 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Şahin, E., Arslan, N. N., & Özdemir, D. (2024) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-024-10437-2 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Regulation of pre-mRNA splicing: roles in physiology and disease, and therapeutic prospects
Rogalska, M. E., Vivori, C., & Valcárcel, J. (2022) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-022-00556-8 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Interpretability and Explainability: A Machine Learning Zoo Mini-tourPreprint
Marcinkevičs, R., & Vogt, J. E. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000454597 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
“[105] propose enhanced integrated gradients and demonstrate that nonlinear paths can improve interpretability on”
BackgroundExplainable AI approaches in deep learning: Advancements, applications and challenges
Hosain, M. T., Jim, J. R., Mridha, M. F., & Kabir, M. (2024) · Computers & electrical engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2024.109246 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Ennab, M., & Mcheick, H. (2025) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make7010012 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
“It heavily depends on the baseline choice and can be expensive since it has to compute the gradients multiple times [28].”
Koo, P. K., & Ploenzke, M. (2021) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-00291-x · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Incorporating Machine Learning into Established Bioinformatics Frameworks
Auslander, N., Gussow, A. B., & Koonin, E. V. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22062903 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
“Incorporation of established bioinformatic methods and databases with ML and DL frameworks [128,196] Generation of interpretable DL models [197–199] A major challenge for the application of ML and particularly DL to biological sequences is the representation of nucleotides or amino acid sequences…”
BackgroundMethodKoo, P. K., Majdandzic, A., Ploenzke, M., Anand, P., & Paul, S. B. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008925 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Discretized Integrated Gradients for Explaining Language Models
Sanyal, S., & Ren, X. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.805 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“Further, Jha et al. (2020) use KNNs and auto-encoders to learn latent paths for RNAs.”
MethodChallenges in AI-driven Biomedical Multimodal Data Fusion and Analysis
Liu, J., Cen, X., Yi, C., Wang, F.-A., Ding, J., Cheng, J., Wu, Q., Gai, B., Zhou, Y., He, R., et al. (2025) · Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/gpbjnl/qzaf011 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“Jha et al. proposed the enhanced integrated gradients (EIG) method [169], which identified significant splicing code features in the liver and was adapted for identifying common transcriptional signatures of cancers [170].”
A review and benchmark of feature importance methods for neural networks
Mandler, H., & Weigand, B. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3679012 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
“As DeepLIFT is not implementation invariant, Sundararajan et al. [136] introduced integrated gradients (IG) , which was later enhanced by Jha et al. [66].”
Interpretable detection of novel human viruses from genome sequencing data
Bartoszewicz, J. M., Seidel, A., & Renard, B. Y. (2021) · NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/nargab/lqab004 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
“This problem can be alleviated with Integrated Gradients (40,41) or DeepLIFT, which propagates activation differences relative to a selected reference back to the input, reducing the computational overhead of obtaining accurate gradients (42).”
BackgroundAndreev, A. V., Kurkin, S., Stoyanov, D., Badarin, A., Paunova, R., & Hramov, A. (2023) · Chaos · doi:10.1063/5.0155567 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Rabbah, J., Ridouani, M., & Hassouni, L. (2025) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2024.107239 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Jin, Y., Jia, S., Ashraf, A., & Hu, P. (2020) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers12102934 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“The combination of both red and blue pixels indicates those regions of interest that are regarded as highly important for the model in assigning a class label to the entire image [27,28].”
BackgroundFrom computational models of the splicing code to regulatory mechanisms and therapeutic implications
Capitanchik, C., Wilkins, O. G., Wagner, N., Gagneur, J., & Ule, J. (2024) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-024-00774-2 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
“‘Backpropagation’, which determines the effect of each artificial neuron on the output, can identify regions of high importance in the input sequence; examples of backpropagation that have been explored to explain splicing models include enhanced integrated gradient (EIG) and Shapley values (in Deep SHAP) 109 .”
Interpreting Cis-Regulatory Interactions from Large-Scale Deep Neural Networks
Toneyan, S., & Koo, P. K. (2024) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-024-01923-3 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Manifold Integrated Gradients: Riemannian Geometry for Feature Attribution
Zaher, E., Trzaskowski, M., Nguyen, Q., & Roosta, F. (2024) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.09800 · Cited by 26
“• EIG (Jha et al., 2020).”
InfluentialDeletion and Insertion Tests in Regression Models
Hama, N., Mase, M., & Owen, A. (2022) · Journal of machine learning research · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.12423 · Cited by 26
“This point was considered by Jha et al. (2020). They train an autoencoder whose encoding layers are extracted from the original model to be explained, and they obtain a generally nonstraight path as the image of a straight line path in the latent space defined by their auto-encoder.”
Zhou, Z., Zhang, J., Zheng, X., Pan, Z., Zhao, F., & Gao, Y. (2024) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202308115 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
fastISM: Performant in-silico saturation mutagenesis for convolutional neural networks
Nair, S., Shrikumar, A., & Kundaje, A. (2020) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.10.13.337147 · Cited by 25
Non‐Invasive Diagnosis of Moyamoya Disease Using Serum Metabolic Fingerprints and Machine Learning
Weng, R., Xu, Y., Gao, X., Cao, L., Su, J., Yang, H., Li, H., Ding, C., Pu, J., Zhang, M., et al. (2024) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202405580 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Explainable and spatial dependence deep learning model for satellite-based O3 monitoring in China
Luo, N., Zang, Z., Yin, C., Liu, M., Jiang, Y., Chen, Z., Zhao, W., Shi, W., & Yan, X. (2022) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119370 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Prakash, E., Shrikumar, A., & Kundaje, A. (2021) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.12.26.474224 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“Consistent with the findings of Jha et al. [17], we speculate that this is due to IG’s linear interpolation path, as interpolated inputs can be out-of-distribution.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialDiscovering differential genome sequence activity with interpretable and efficient deep learning
Hammelman, J., & Gifford, D. (2021) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009282 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Identifying common transcriptome signatures of cancer by interpreting deep learning models
Jha, A., Quesnel-Vallières, M., Wang, D., Thomas-Tikhonenko, A., Lynch, K. W., & Barash, Y. (2021) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1101/2021.11.11.467790 · Cited by 16
“Following our previous work (Jha et al., 2020), we used the median of normal samples as the baseline (see Methods section ”Interpretation of tumor classification models” for details).”
InfluentialSelf-citationPerspective on recent developments and challenges in regulatory and systems genomics
Zeitlinger, J., Roy, S., Ay, F., Mathelier, A., Medina-Rivera, A., Mahony, S., Sinha, S. K., & Ernst, J. (2024) · Bioinformatics Advances · doi:10.1093/bioadv/vbaf106 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“The most common first step is to use an attribution method, e.g. gradient-based saliency maps (Sundararajan et al. 2017, Jha et al. 2020, Majdandzic et al. 2023), or Shapley-based methods such as DeepSHAP (Lundberg and Lee 2017, Shrikumar et al. 2017).”
Explainable AI for gastrointestinal disease diagnosis in telesurgery Healthcare 4.0
Patel, M., Gohil, K., Gohil, A., Ramoliya, F., Gupta, R., Tanwar, S., Pólkowski, Z., Alqahtani, F. H., & Tolba, A. K. R. (2024) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2024.109414 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Zeng, L., Chen, J., Zhang, C., Yan, X., Ji, F.-Q., Chang, X., Wang, S.-S., Feng, Z., Xu, C., & Xiong, D. (2024) · Measurement science and technology · doi:10.1088/1361-6501/ad4e58 · Cited by 13
“The integrated gradient along the i th dimension of inputs x and baseline x ′ is defined as shown in equation 21, where ∂ F ( x ) ∂ x i is the gradient of F ( x ) along the i th dimension [47].”
Gauge fixing for sequence-function relationships
(2025) · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012818 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Bernardo, E., Vas, M. G. D., Balboa, D., Cuenca-Ardura, M., Bonàs‐Guarch, S., Planas-Fèlix, M., Mollandin, F., Torrens-Dinarès, M., Maestro, M. A., García-Hurtado, J., et al. (2025) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2025.07.007 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Accelerating in-silico saturation mutagenesis using compressed sensing
Schreiber, J., Nair, S., Balsubramani, A., & Kundaje, A. (2021) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.11.08.467498 · Cited by 11
“Unsurprisingly, a large number of these feature attribution methods have been proposed, but we have seen three main classes of feature attribution methods: gradient-based [1, 2, 3, 4], path-based [5, 6], and counterfactual- or perturbation-based [7, 8, 9].”
BackgroundGauge fixing for sequence-function relationships
Posfai, A., Zhou, J., McCandlish, D. M., & Kinney, J. B. (2024) · doi:10.1101/2024.05.12.593772 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Perturbation of mRNA splicing in liver cancer: insights, opportunities and challenges
Jia, Q., Sun, X., Li, H., Guo, J., Niu, K., Chan, K. M., Bernards, R., Qin, W., & Jin, H. (2024) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2024-333127 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Even though there are still technical challenges in applying AS profiles to clinical areas, active research on AS is of great importance, which may lead to novel ideas for pertinent applications in clinical and pharmaceutical fields and offer further opportunities to resolve the complex patterns of AS.”
InfluentialSardar, S., Dash, S., Roychowdhury, P., Solanki, J., Sikdar, P., Thangappan, J., & Dutta, S. (2026) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbag269 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Enhanced integrated gradients (EIGs) for biology introduced nonlinear paths, group-specific baselines, and statistical significance tests, outperforming DeepSHAP in identifying biologically relevant features [ 96].”
Overcoming the Black Box Challenge: Building Trust in Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Oncology
Alum, E. U., Egwu, C. K., Manjula, V. S., Ekpang, P. O., Ekpang, J. E., Echegu, D. A., Alum, B. N., & Uti, D. E. (2026) · Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment · doi:10.1177/15330338261434649 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“22 Surrogate Models and Rule Extraction (Global Interpretability) An interpretable model can be trained to provide a high-level view of model behavior and decision boundaries.”
Advances in alternative splicing identification: deep learning and pantranscriptome
Shen, F., Hu, C., Huang, X., He, H., Yang, D., Zhao, J., & Yang, X. (2023) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1232466 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Identification of thrombopoiesis inducer based on a hybrid deep neural network model.
Mo, Q., Zhang, T., Wu, J.-M., Wang, L., & Luo, J. (2023) · Thrombosis Research · doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2023.04.011 · Cited by 7
Comparing Baseline Shapley and Integrated Gradients for Local Explanation: Some Additional Insights
Feng, T., Zhou, Z.-P., Tarun, J., & Nair, V. (2022) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2208.06096 · Cited by 7
Gao, S., Rehman, J., & Dai, Y. (2022) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2022.07.014 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“While the method of Integrated Gradients has been used in several genomics studies to identify regulators of splicing in important genome regions for a distinct purpose [53], the baseline selection of integrated gradients for DNA sequencing and epigenetics modifications remains an open question.”
MethodFeature Importance in the Context of Traditional and Just-In-Time Software Defect Prediction Models
Haldar, S., & Capretz, L. F. (2024) · Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering · doi:10.1109/ccece59415.2024.10667167 · Cited by 6
Mining Spatiotemporal Information for Harmful Algal Bloom Forecasting and Mechanism Interpreting
Jia, Q.-M., Xu, C., Jia, H., Velazquez, C., Leng, L., & Yin, D. (2024) · ACS ES&T Water · doi:10.1021/acsestwater.4c00115 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
PhilaeX: Explaining the Failure and Success of AI Models in Malware Detection
Lu, Z., & Thing, V. L. L. (2022) · International Conference on Internet of Things, Big Data and Security (IoTBDS) · doi:10.5220/0010986700003194 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“In addition, the baseline is unclear in certain fields, such as genomics domain (Jha et al., 2020).”
BackgroundMapping Data to Deep Understanding: Making the Most of the Deluge of SARS-CoV-2 Genome Sequences
Sokhansanj, B., & Rosen, G. L. (2022) · mSystems · doi:10.1128/msystems.00035-22 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Integrated gradients have been used to analyze RNA splicing models (82).”
MethodA graph-based machine learning framework for river water quality management under data limitations.
Choi, S., Ullah, Z., & Son, M. (2026) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.128575 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Koo, P. K., Ploenzke, M., Anand, P., Paul, S. B., & Majdandzic, A. (2020) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.09.08.288068 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Recently, deep neural networks (DNNs), predominantly based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) or convolutional-recurrent network hybrids, have emerged as a promising alternative, in most cases, improving prediction performance on held-out test data 13–19 .”
BackgroundZhuang, F., Gutman, D., Islas, N., Guzmán, B. B., Jimenez, A., Jewell, S., Hand, N. J., Nathanson, K. L., Dominguez, D., & Barash, Y. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-65020-7 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“To assess the signi fi cance of these attributions, we followed the procedure in 37 and conducted a two-sided t-test comparing the k-mer attribution scores of each token and a random set of tokens, adjusting for multiple comparisons using Benjamini-Hochberg procedure with a signi fi cance threshold…”
InfluentialSelf-citationG, M., K., N. R., & Marimuthu, M. (2023) · 2023 Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies (i-PACT) · doi:10.1109/i-pact58649.2023.10434839 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Integrating Integrated gradient with a self-refined segment editing model [16] for object tracking can enhance the model's transparency and provide interpretable insights into its tracking decisions.”
BackgroundInterpretable and Predictive Deep Modeling of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Sequence
Sokhansanj, B., Zhao, Z.-Q., & Rosen, G. (2021) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.12.26.21268414 · Cited by 4
“[ 90] For CNN-based models, a saliency map method has been proposed for identifying what part of a sample (image, or text) was identified as an important feature by the model.”
MethodResilience of Bayesian Layer-Wise Explanations under Adversarial Attacks
Carbone, G., Bortolussi, L., & Sanguinetti, G. (2022) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn55064.2022.9892788 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Integrated gradients have been extended in several works [26, 27, 28].”
BackgroundRethink Baseline of Integrated Gradients from the Perspective of Shapley Value
Liu, S., Chen, Z.-X., Shi, G., Wang, J., Fan, C., Xiong, Y., Wu, R., Hu, Y., Ji, Z., & Gao, Y. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.04821 · Cited by 3
“Since its introduction, IG has continuously evolved (Ghorbani, Abid, and Zou 2019; Jha et al. 2020; Yang, Wang, and Bilgic 2023; Pourdarbani et al. 2023; Yang, Wang, and Bilgic 2023), language models’ explanation (En-guehard 2023), and electronic health (Duell et al. 2023).”
BackgroundHe, H., Ying, Z., Li, B., Fan, Y., Wang, P., Lu, J., Wu, L., Zhao, H., Guo, Y., Wang, G., et al. (2026) · Communications Medicine · doi:10.1038/s43856-026-01449-1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
A Review of Developmental Interpretability in Large Language Models
Kendiukhov, I. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.15841 · Cited by 3
“While other attribution methods like Integrated Gradients or LRP [14] can assign importance scores to model components, the direct, interventional nature of patching is widely considered a more rigorous and reliable test of a component's true functional role”
Using the Path of Least Resistance to Explain Deep Networks
Salek, S., & Enguehard, J. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.12108 · Cited by 3
“The idea of using a k NN algorithm to avoid computing gradients on out of distribution data points has also been used in Enhanced Integrated Gradients Jha et al. (2020).”
Interpreting Cis-Regulatory Interactions from Large-Scale Deep Neural Networks for GenomicsPreprint
Toneyan, S., & Koo, P. K. (2023) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.07.03.547592 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Kang, J.-J., Li, J., Liu, W.-Q., Shen, M., Zhou, Y.-W., Jia, X., & Tang, Q. (2026) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2026.153530 · Cited by 2
Spectral Integrated Gradients for Coarse-to-Fine Feature Attribution
Kim, S., Lim, S., Lee, K., & Choi, J. (2026) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3770855.3817830 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Thus ∇ 𝑓 ( 𝛾 ( 𝛼 )) = ∇ 𝑓 ( 𝑇𝛾 ( 𝛼 )) = 𝑇 ∇ 𝑓 ( 𝛾 ( 𝛼 )) .”
Manifold-Aligned Guided Integrated Gradients for Reliable Feature Attribution
Kim, S., Lim, S., Lee, K., & Choi, J. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.02167 · Cited by 2
“Among many approaches, path-based methods (Sundararajan et al., 2017; Jha et al., 2020; Kapishnikov et al., 2021; Pan et al., 2021; Zaher et al., 2024; Zhuo & Ge, 2024) are particularly attractive because they connect attributions to principled requirements such as completeness and sensitivity…”
InfluentialLi, J., Fan, Y.-B., Gong, J.-H., Chen, J., Chen, R.-Y., Zhang, W., & Zhao, Y.-L. (2026) · Engineering applications of artificial intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2025.113500 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
OmiXAI: An Ensemble XAI Pipeline for Interpretable Deep Learning in Omics Data
Alaeva, A., Lapteva, A. P., Mikhaylovskaya, N., Malkov, V., Herbert, A., Borevskiy, A., & Poptsova, M. (2025) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-62633-w · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Gradient-based methods depend on the choice of baseline, can produce erroneous results if the network output saturates in the early stages of integration, and often involve high computational costs-especially for Integrated Gradients [46] [47].”
A Hybrid GCN and LSTM Structure Based on Attention Mechanism for Crime Prediction
Hu, J.-M. (2021) · Converter · doi:10.17762/converter.132 · Cited by 2
“The interpretability plays a pivotal role in both model optimization and application [29].”
BackgroundPath Integrals for the Attribution of Model Uncertainties
Perez, I., Skalski, P., Barns-Graham, A. E., Wong, J., & Sutton, D. (2021) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.08756 · Cited by 1
“Additionally, δ transitions the path x 0 x out-of-distribution [Jha et al., 2020, Adebayo et al., 2020], i.e. through intermediary images not representative of training data, leading to noise and artefacts in attributions.”
BackgroundDiffusion Integrated Gradients: Controllable Path Generation for Flexible Feature Attribution
Kim, S., Lee, K., & Choi, J. (2026) · European Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.22314 · Cited by 1
“IG [59] 0.3303 0.6775 0.3472 GIG [25] 0.3319 0.6781 0.3462 IG 2 [67] 0.2030 0.6010 0.3980 AGI [44] 0.4033 0.7290 0.3257 EIG [23] 0.3316 0.6688 0.3373 MIG [64] 0.3356 0.6751 0.3395 SPI [22] 0.1980 0.6105 0.4125 DiffIG 0.5711 0.7878 0.2166”
InfluentialDriving force analysis of soil quality across China through an explainable deep learning framework
Li, Y.-J., Jia, Q.-M., Li, Y.-Q., Ma, J.-W., & Xia, X. (2026) · Ecological Processes · doi:10.1186/s13717-026-00708-2 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“IG has been proven to satisfy two fundamental axioms: sensitivity (the attribution is non-zero when the predictions are different for baseline) and implementation invariance (the attributions are always identical for two functionally equivalent networks) (Jha et al. 2020).”
Orlov, A. V., Makus, Y. V., Ashniev, G. A., Orlova, N. N., & Nikitin, P. I. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.03.04.709491 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Additional considerations include baseline selection, where dinucleotide-shuffled references outperform zero baselines [58], and integration path choice [59].”
Zhang, X., Yang, T., Wang, H., & Miao, J. (2025) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s44443-025-00231-y · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Larger gradient changes suggest a more significant influence of the corresponding feature on the model output, indicating a more critical role in the learning process (Jha et al. 2020; Chan et al., 2024).”
al-Badri, M. A., Cross, W., & Barnes, C. (2025) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.03.08.584160 · Cited by 1
Watanabe, N., Kuriya, Y., Murata, M., Yamamoto, M., Shimizu, M., & Araki, M. (2023) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology12060795 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Several studies have recently reported integrated gradients (IG) and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP), included in explainable artificial intelligence methods [24,25], to interpret prediction models and to explore important features for prediction [6,26,27].”
BackgroundEnhancing vortex-flow-meter precision using physics-informed contrastive learning
Wernli, S., Hollmach, M., Franzmann, C., Kessler, D., Fernandes, H., & Huber, L. G. (2026) · Flow Measurement and Instrumentation · doi:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2026.103207 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Deep Interpretation with Sign Separated and Contribution Recognized Decomposition
Hui, L. Y. W., & Soh, D. W. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85030-2_33 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
A comprehensive evaluation of self-attention for detecting regulatory feature interactions
Jabeen, S., & Ben-Hur, A. (2026) · NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/nargab/lqaf209 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“These include in silico mutagenesis [2] and gradient-based methods [10, 11].”
Barghout, R. A., Wu, S., Chau, W., Barraza-Chavez, J. M., Driza, P., Mahadevan, R., & Sánchez-Lengeling, B. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.10.21.760763
“Attribution methods have been applied to biological sequences to investigate features associated with predicted mRNA abundance [11], RNA splicing [12] and RNA protein-coding potential [13].”
Kirsch, M., & Preisach, C. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.19270
“IG is a widely used and theoretically grounded attribution method for explaining predictions of di ff erentiable models [36, 37].”
Ong, C. J. N., Nazari, R., & Cruz (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-02448-w
“Methods such as SHAP, LIME, Integrated Gradients, and DeepLIFT can therefore be used to rank influential features and generate hypotheses about resistance-associated mutations, motifs, genes, or regulatory regions [125–127].”
Patjoshi, S., Madan, S., & Fröhlich, H. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.11.05.686884
“IG’s proven success on biological sequence models provides robust validation for high-confidence interaction calls 81.”
Mehmood, Z., & Sharma, D. (2026) · Frontiers in Bioinformatics · doi:10.3389/fbinf.2026.1901464
Ye, Z.-H., Ji, Z.-C., Xia, F., Zhu, H.-W., Feng, J.-H., & Shen, G.-P. (2026) · Talanta: The International Journal of Pure and Applied Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2026.130677
A GRU-based Model for Early Stroke Prediction Using Surface Electromyography Signals
Chile-Agada, B., Ochei, L., & Egbono, F. (2026) · International Journal of Intelligent Information Systems · doi:10.11648/j.ijiis.20261502.12
Designing gene expression with MPRA and AI: A new paradigm for synthetic and therapeutic regulation
Zhang, X., Huang, X.-Y., Wang, H.-Y., Bai, F., Li, K., & Hu, S. S. (2026) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2026.109049
Ye, Z.-H., Guo, Y., Ji, Z.-C., Zhu, H.-W., Feng, J.-H., & Shen, G.-P. (2026) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2026.345614
Does ensembling improve feature attributions from sequence-to-activity models?
Maslova, A., & Libbrecht, M. (2026) · bioRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.07.08.737315
“Post-hoc feature attribution methods such as DeepLIFT [28] or Enhanced Integrated Gradients [15] are used to identify biologically important sequence features [20].”
ProLM: a plasma proteomics pretrained model for the general population
Qiu, S., Zhao, M. H., Chen, X. T., ZHANG, Z., You, H., Sun, X., Guo, J., Liang, H., Guo, Y., Chen, L., et al. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-75507-6
“We quanti fi ed protein-level importance in the pretrained ProLM masked-regression setting using IG 75 .”
Sun, Y., Wang, X., Jia, Y., Imoto, S., Li, F., Li, C., & Song, J. (2026) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbag329
“[ 82] for tissue-specific splicing patterns in mice and Enhanced Integrated Gradients [ 83] for tissue-specific regulator identification, laid the conceptual foundations for context-aware variant effect prediction.”
Norouzi, V., Ahmadian, D., Ballestra, L. V., & Almasizadeh, J. (2026) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2026.133723
Lazo, Y., Paz, Á., Crawford, B., Valle, C., Rodriguez-Tello, E., Soto, R., Barrera-García, J., Cisternas-Caneo, F., & Cortés, B. L. (2026) · Biomimetics · doi:10.3390/biomimetics11020098
“Variables with positive contributions increased the probability of predicting income reporting discontinuities, whereas negative contributions favored compliance predictions [36].”
Gong, P.-X., Li, J., Tian, W., Ding, X., Su, R.-L., & Yue, D. (2025) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes17010017
“…systematically evaluated based on their discriminative importance for caste identity rather than expression magnitude alone, providing an interpretable ranking of key regulatory candidates and effectively complementing conventional differential expression and functional enrichment analyses [50,51].”
Adversarial attack of sequence-free enhancer prediction identifies chromatin architecture
Gafur, J., Lang, O. W., & Lai, W. (2025) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf371
“…approaches such as integrated gradient calculation and game theory-based approaches such as Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) are now applied to networks trained on genomics and epigenomic datasets (Lundberg and Lee 2017, Sundararajan et al. 2017, Jha et al. 2020, Majdandzic et al. 2023).”
Semantically Rich Local Dataset Generation for Explainable AI in Genomics
Barbosa, P., Savisaar, R., & Fonseca, A. (2024) · Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1145/3638529.3653990
“Despite the progress made in designing interpretable-by-design deep nets [21, 34, 42], post-hoc interpretation techniques are the most common strategy to study what the model learns (via input perturbations [40, 61] or attribution-based methods [28, 49, 52]).”
CIDR: A Cooperative Integrated Dynamic Refining Method for Minimal Feature Removal Problem
Chen, Q., Zhang, T., Li, D., & He, X.-F. (2023) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.08157
“…algorithms, such as LIME (Ribeiro, Singh, and Guestrin 2016), integrated gradients (Sundararajan, Taly, and Yan 2017; Miglani et al. 2020; Jha et al. 2020; Sanyal and Ren 2021; Enguehard 2023), and model-dependent meth-ods, such as LRP(Voita, Sennrich, and Titov 2021), VMASK (Chen and Ji…”
MethodClassification of MDD patients with using network measures
Andreev, A. (2023) · 2023 7th Scientific School Dynamics of Complex Networks and their Applications (DCNA) · doi:10.1109/dcna59899.2023.10290687
Palczewska, A., & Markowska-Kaczmar, U. (2021) · International Conference on Conceptual Structures · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77964-1_12
“In [4, 6, 11] methods, based on partial derivatives in ANN sensitivity analysis were proposed to calculate variable importance.”
- Authors
- Jha, A., K. Aicher, J., R. Gazzara, M., Singh, D., & Barash, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Barash, Yoseph
- Venue
- Genome Biology
- Published
- 2020-06-19
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 149-149
- ISSN
- 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-760X
- PMC
- PMC7305616
- OpenAlex
- W3036652698
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 3.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG046544)
- National Cancer Institute (U01CA232563)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM128096)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (F30HD098803)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Keywords
- integrated gradients, explainable AI, deep learning interpretability, alternative splicing, A1CF, PAR-CLIP, protein-DNA interactions, digit classification, feature attribution
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Animals, Liver, RNA Splicing, Mice, Knockout, Computational Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review