The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comparison between cystatin C, plasma creatinine and the Cockcroft and Gault formula for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is often estimated from plasma creatinine. Several studies have shown cystatin C (cys C) to be a better parameter for the diagnosis of impaired renal function. No data are available, however, on the performance of cys C in follow-up of patients, compared with creatinine. Also, comparisons of cys C with the Cockcroft and Gault (C&G) formula for estimation of GFR are few. METHODS: Plasma samples were obtained from 93 consecutive patients seen for GFR determination and from 30 patients with diabetes mellitus type 2, of whom 23 were investigated a second time after 2 years. GFR was determined with [125I]iothalamate. Plasma creatinine was determined enzymatically and the creatinine clearance calculated according to C&G. Cys C was measured with a particle-enhanced immunonephelometric method. RESULTS: GFR correlated with 1/cys C (r = 0.873) as well as with C&G (r = 0.876). The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating curves (ROCs), a measure of diagnostic accuracy, for cys C (0.931) and C&G (0.938) were equal (P = 0.815) and both better than the creatinine AUC (0.848; P = 0.006). Bland and Altman analysis showed that the simple formula GFR = -4.32 + 80.35 x 1/cys C, derived from our data, gave more accurate (P < 0.0001) and more precise (P = 0.024) GFR estimates than obtained with the C&G formula. The day-to-day variation (biological +analytical) for cys C was small (3.1%, SD 2.51%) in diabetic patients. In the follow-up study in diabetic patients, cys C was the parameter which had the best correlation (r = 0.66) with changes in GFR. CONCLUSIONS: Cys C shows a high correlation with GFR. With a very simple formula, cys C gives a good estimate of GFR, more accurate and precise than C&G. Because biological variation is low, cys C gives also a good assessment of GFR changes during follow-up. Cys C is the preferred endogenous parameter for GFR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.10.001 · Cited by 5,220
Bökenkamp, A., Domanetzki, M., Zinck, R., Schumann, G., Byrd, D., & Brodehl, J. (1999) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/45.10.1866 · Cited by 123
Cited by
Perkins, B. A., Nelson, R. G., Ostrander, B. E. P., Blouch, K. L., Krolewski, A. S., Myers, B. D., & Warram, J. H. (2005) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2004100854 · Cited by 323
Biochemistry and Clinical Role of Human Cystatin C
Mussap, M., & Plebani, M. (2004) · Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences · doi:10.1080/10408360490504934 · Cited by 313
Kidney dysfunction in the postoperative period
Sear, J. W. (2005) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aei018 · Cited by 294
Macdonald, J. H., Marcora, S. M., Jibani, M., Roberts, G., Kumwenda, M. J., Glover, R., Barron, J., & Lemmey, A. B. (2006) · Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfl432 · Cited by 57
Evaluation of cystatin C in malignancy and comparability of estimates of GFR in oncology patients
Jones, M., Denieffe, S., Griffin, C., Tinago, W., & Fitzgibbon, M. C. (2017) · Practical Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.plabm.2017.05.005 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoek, F. J.
- Venue
- Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-10-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2024-2031
- ISSN
- 0931-0509 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2385
- OpenAlex
- W2108670430
- Cited by
- 564
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison between cystatin C, plasma creatinine and the Cockcroft and Gault formula for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ndt/gfg349
- The paper
- Hoek, F. J. (2003). A comparison between cystatin C, plasma creatinine and the Cockcroft and Gault formula for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfg349
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.