The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Expanding the donor pool to increase renal transplantation
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The goal of the Eurotransplant renal allocation scheme is to provide every patient on the waiting list with a reasonably balanced opportunity for a donor offer. New initiatives were taken in order to maximize donor usage while maintaining a successful transplant outcome. METHODS: Two Eurotransplant projects were launched in order to accommodate changes in donor and recipient profiles. A re-addressing of the non-heart-beating donor pool was undertaken and an allocation scheme in which organs from donors aged >65 are allocated to recipients aged >65 [the Eurotransplant Senior Programme (ESP)] was introduced. RESULTS: Especially in The Netherlands, an enormous increase in the number of non-heart-beating donor kidneys has been observed, however with a pace-keeping reduction in heart-beating donors. The organization-wide implementation of the ESP has been successful. The 3 year graft survival rates for these age-matched transplants were as good as the human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched transplants (64 vs 67%) (P = 0.4). CONCLUSION: Within the framework of sound research, the utmost flexibility and creativity is needed to keep or even increase the number of renal transplants when faced with a quantitatively stagnating but qualitatively deteriorating donor pool. Both the non-heart-beating donor protocol and the ESP have proven to be quite successful in achieving this goal without compromising the outcome for the individual end-stage renal disease patient.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Machine Perfusion or Cold Storage in Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplantation
Moers, C., Smits, J. M., Maathuis, M.-H. J., Treckmann, J., van Gelder, F., Napieralski, B. P., van Kasterop-Kutz, M., van der Heide, J. J. H., Squifflet, J.-P., van Heurn, E., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0802289 · Cited by 1,020
Self-citationFrei, U., Noeldeke, J., Machold-Fabrizii, V., Arbogast, H., Margreiter, R., Fricke, L., Voiculescu, A., Kliem, V., Ebel, H., Albert, U., et al. (2008) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02014.x · Cited by 358
Self-citationDomínguez-Gil, B., Haase-Kromwijk, B., Van Leiden, H., Neuberger, J., Coene, L., Morel, P., Corinne, A., Muehlbacher, F., Brezovsky, P., Costa, A. N., et al. (2011) · Transplant International · doi:10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01257.x · Cited by 288
Markers of cellular senescence in zero hour biopsies predict outcome in renal transplantation
Koppelstaetter, C., Schratzberger, G., Perco, P., Hofer, J., Mark, W., Öllinger, R., Oberbauer, R., Schwarz, C., Mitterbauer, C., Kainz, A., et al. (2008) · Aging Cell · doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00398.x · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohen, B., Smits, J. M., Haase, B., Persijn, G., Vanrenterghem, Y., & Frei, U.
- Venue
- Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-11-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34-41
- ISSN
- 0931-0509 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2385
- OpenAlex
- W2045985257
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Expanding the donor pool to increase renal transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ndt/gfh506
- The paper
- Cohen, B., Smits, J. M., Haase, B., Persijn, G., Vanrenterghem, Y., & Frei, U. (2005). Expanding the donor pool to increase renal transplantation. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfh506
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.