Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 190

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Imaging, Distribution, and Toxicity of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Magnetic Resonance Nanoparticles in the Rat Brain and Intracerebral Tumor

Leslie L. Muldoon, Sándor Manninger, Kristina E. Pinkston, Edward A. Neuwelt·2005·Neurosurgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents are gaining use in the central nervous system. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the imaging characteristics, distribution, time course, and neurotoxicity of the clinical agents ferumoxtran-10, ferumoxides, and ferumoxytol, and the laboratory preparation MION-46 in rat brain. METHODS: Iron oxide agents were administered by intracerebral inoculation or intraarterially after osmotic blood-brain barrier opening in normal rats and intravenously in nude rats with intracerebral tumor xenografts. Rat brains were imaged by MRI at multiple time points and then were assessed for iron histochemistry and pathological features. RESULTS: After intracerebral injection, MRI signal changes declined slowly over weeks to months. After transvascular delivery, transient (3 d) enhancement was seen with ferumoxtran-10 or ferumoxytol, whereas ferumoxides induced long-term (28 d) signal dropout. No pathological brain cell or myelin changes were detected after delivery of the clinical iron oxide agents to normal brains. In tumor models, ferumoxtran-10 enhanced one small-cell lung carcinoma intracerebral tumor, which correlated with iron staining in cells with macrophage morphological features at the tumor margin. Little enhancement was seen in two other models. CONCLUSION: These studies demonstrate the safety and efficacy of iron oxide-based MRI contrast agents in the brain and provide imaging parameters and time course data for future studies in brain tumors and neurological lesions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.1093/neurosurgery/57.4.785

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 190

Metadata

Authors
Muldoon, L. L., Manninger, S., Pinkston, K. E., & Neuwelt, E. A.
Venue
Neurosurgery
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Published
2005-10-01
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
785-796
ISSN
0148-396X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994139105
Cited by
190
References
1
FWCI
7.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Imaging, Distribution, and Toxicity of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Magnetic Resonance Nanoparticles in the Rat Brain and Intracerebral Tumor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/neurosurgery/57.4.785
The paper
Muldoon, L. L., Manninger, S., Pinkston, K. E., & Neuwelt, E. A. (2005). Imaging, Distribution, and Toxicity of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Magnetic Resonance Nanoparticles in the Rat Brain and Intracerebral Tumor. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1093/neurosurgery/57.4.785

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.