The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Imaging, Distribution, and Toxicity of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Magnetic Resonance Nanoparticles in the Rat Brain and Intracerebral Tumor
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents are gaining use in the central nervous system. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the imaging characteristics, distribution, time course, and neurotoxicity of the clinical agents ferumoxtran-10, ferumoxides, and ferumoxytol, and the laboratory preparation MION-46 in rat brain. METHODS: Iron oxide agents were administered by intracerebral inoculation or intraarterially after osmotic blood-brain barrier opening in normal rats and intravenously in nude rats with intracerebral tumor xenografts. Rat brains were imaged by MRI at multiple time points and then were assessed for iron histochemistry and pathological features. RESULTS: After intracerebral injection, MRI signal changes declined slowly over weeks to months. After transvascular delivery, transient (3 d) enhancement was seen with ferumoxtran-10 or ferumoxytol, whereas ferumoxides induced long-term (28 d) signal dropout. No pathological brain cell or myelin changes were detected after delivery of the clinical iron oxide agents to normal brains. In tumor models, ferumoxtran-10 enhanced one small-cell lung carcinoma intracerebral tumor, which correlated with iron staining in cells with macrophage morphological features at the tumor margin. Little enhancement was seen in two other models. CONCLUSION: These studies demonstrate the safety and efficacy of iron oxide-based MRI contrast agents in the brain and provide imaging parameters and time course data for future studies in brain tumors and neurological lesions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Blood Pool MR Angiography of Aortic Stent-Graft Endoleak
Ersoy, H., Jacobs, P., Kent, C. K., & Prince, M. R. (2004) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.182.5.1821181 · Cited by 119
Cited by
Reddy, L. H., Arias, J. L., Nicolas, J., & Couvreur, P. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300068p · Cited by 2,010
Biomedical Nanomagnetics: A Spin Through Possibilities in Imaging, Diagnostics, and Therapy
Krishnan, K. M. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Magnetics · doi:10.1109/tmag.2010.2046907 · Cited by 819
Weinstein, J. S., Varallyay, C. G., Dosa, E., Gahramanov, S., Hamilton, B., Rooney, W. D., Muldoon, L. L., & Neuwelt, E. A. (2010) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2009.192 · Cited by 500
Self-citationNanoparticles in modern medicine: state of the art and future challenges.
(2007) · PubMed Central · Cited by 484
Nanotechnology, nanotoxicology, and neuroscience
Suh, W. H., Suslick, K. S., Stucky, G. D., & Suh, Y.-H. (2009) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2008.09.009 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Muldoon, L. L., Manninger, S., Pinkston, K. E., & Neuwelt, E. A.
- Venue
- Neurosurgery
- Publisher
- Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
- Published
- 2005-10-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 785-796
- ISSN
- 0148-396X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994139105
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Imaging, Distribution, and Toxicity of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Magnetic Resonance Nanoparticles in the Rat Brain and Intracerebral Tumor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/neurosurgery/57.4.785
- The paper
- Muldoon, L. L., Manninger, S., Pinkston, K. E., & Neuwelt, E. A. (2005). Imaging, Distribution, and Toxicity of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Magnetic Resonance Nanoparticles in the Rat Brain and Intracerebral Tumor. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1093/neurosurgery/57.4.785
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.