Cited by 49Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsSmoking Behavior and CessationIndigenous Cultures and History

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 40 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Decolonization of Tobacco in Indigenous Communities of Turtle Island (North America)

Open access
Nez Henderson, Patricia, Lee, Juliet P, Soto, Claradina, O′Leary, Rae, Rutan, Emma, D′Silva, Joanne, Waa, Andrew, Henderson, Zahlanii P, Nez, Shanoa S, Maddox, Raglan·2022·Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Abstract

Indigenous peoples represent a diversity of cultures, perspectives, languages, experiences, and protocols that bring tremendous vibrancy across Turtle Island, commonly known as North America. We acknowledge the diversity of practices among these peoples, especially in their relationship with tobacco. The colonization of Turtle Island, which escalated after Christopher Columbus accidentally came unto the lands of the Arawakan people of the Caribbean, not only altered—and continues to alter—the culture, language, and traditions of the original inhabitants of this land, but it also has modified how tobacco is discussed.1 Colonization is the action(s) or process(es) of settling and establishing control over the respective Indigenous peoples of the land, in this case across Turtle Island. Colonization also determines whose values and knowledges are privileged. This commentary discusses the impact of colonization on tobacco, the introduction of commercial tobacco, the relationship between tobacco and Indigenous populations, as well as the harmful influence this exchange has on Indigenous health and well-being. Decolonizing tobacco seeks to actively reverse and remedy the colonization of tobacco, through direct action, listening, and privileging Indigenous voices and peoples. This is consistent with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. There are many different species of tobacco plants indigenous to Turtle Island, including Nicotiana rustica and Nicotiana tabacum. Before colonization, many Indigenous peoples used tobacco as a sacred medicinal plant in ceremonial and cultural practices, often to promote wellness for individuals and communities. Most Indigenous peoples across the world have unique practices, protocols, and relationships with a variety of plants. Some Indigenous peoples do not use tobacco, but different types of plants, such as red willow (the Lakota’s Caŋsasa and the Anishinaabe’s Asemaa). Even though red willow is not a Nicotiana species plant, these tribes refer to these plants as “ceremonial tobacco,” “sacred tobacco,” “traditional tobacco,” or “natural tobacco.” “Tobacco” is said to have been a term in Taíno, a language of the Arawakan people, but was claimed by the Spanish in 1550. This claiming of language was one of the first forms of colonization, setting a dangerous precedent.2,3 Years later, European settlers continued this pattern of colonization by industrializing and modifying tobacco—developing the tobacco plant as a plantation crop. Subsequent mass production and distribution of adulterated tobacco, in the form of cigarettes, have resulted in commercial tobacco products being available in large quantities and low-cost, readily accessible forms. Materials added to commercial cigarettes by the tobacco industry may have masked smells, increased nicotine content, exacerbated addictiveness, and lowered production costs, but more importantly, these modifications and alterations threaten the sacred nature of the plant for many Indigenous peoples.4 The tobacco industry continues to adulterate and manipulate tobacco, more recently through the production of electronic cigarettes, which vaporize extracted nicotine together with other fluids, flavors, and other additives, further distancing these commercial tobacco products from the tobacco plant’s origins.5 The global promotion of commercial tobacco, and the subsequent addiction of Indigenous peoples to commercialized nicotine products, is a modern form of colonization and subjugation at national and international levels.5 Indigenous knowledge values, behaviors, and protocols have been suppressed (oftentimes appropriated for financial gain) through colonization processes implemented by governments, churches, and other institutions.6–8 For example, the US federal government passed the Code of Indian Offenses in 1883, prohibiting Indigenous peoples from the right to perform cultural and traditional ceremonial practices, such as the ghost and sun dances. Both of these ceremonial practices involved the use of ceremonial tobacco.9,10 In Canada, ceremonial tobacco use and ceremonial practices were more broadly illegal under the Indian Act of 1885 and its associated amendments.8 However, commercial tobacco use was not illegal, contributing to the promotion of commercial tobacco use among First Nations (status and non-status) and Métis peoples.8,11 As a direct consequence of these policies, commercial tobacco products were introduced into ceremonial practices as a harmful and unsustainable replacement to sacred tobacco.1,8,11 The restrictions of cultural and ceremonial practices, including use of ceremonial tobacco, were finally lifted in the United States in 1978 and in 1951 in Canada.8,9 Among some Indigenous peoples, the modification, transformation, and commercialization of the Nicotiana tobacco plant belittle, disrespect, and complicate the understanding of these plants that are endemic to Turtle Island.12,13 The wide

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This commentary argues that the globalization and mass production of commercial tobacco constitutes a modern form of colonization that has been imposed on Indigenous peoples of Turtle Island (North America), displacing and threatening sacred/ceremonial tobacco. The authors call for decolonizing tobacco by distinguishing "commercial" from "ceremonial" tobacco and offer six recommendations for researchers, funders, and professional organizations.

Key findings

As a commentary, it advances arguments rather than reporting original data:

  • Colonization suppressed Indigenous ceremonial practices involving tobacco (e.g., the US Code of Indian Offenses of 1883 and Canada's Indian Act of 1885), while commercial tobacco remained legal, leading commercial products to be substituted into ceremonial practices; restrictions were lifted in 1978 (US) and 1951 (Canada).
  • Indigenous peoples of Turtle Island report the highest prevalence of cigarette smoking, "with above 50% in many communities, and lowest quit rates of all groups," contributing to higher smoking-related morbidity and mortality.
  • The authors argue that "tobacco endgame" and deficit-based public health language that fails to distinguish commercial from ceremonial tobacco constitutes "further colonial erasure."
  • Six recommendations are offered, including policies protecting and revitalizing ceremonial tobacco, normalizing the term "commercial tobacco" in regulatory science, and meaningful engagement with Indigenous leaders consistent with the WHO FCTC and UNDRIP.

Methods

Not stated in the paper (commentary; no study design, sample, or analysis is described). The authors describe their approach as reflecting on acts of colonization and their impacts and offering recommendations, grounded in cited literature and UNDRIP Article 24.

Limitations

Not stated in the paper. Evident from the text: this is a commentary without empirical data, so its claims rest on cited literature and the authors' normative argument; the authors also acknowledge the diversity of Indigenous practices and relationships with tobacco, cautioning that decolonization efforts "must work carefully in such a way that does not continue to disenfranchise Indigenous peoples or restrict the use and understanding of ceremonial tobacco."

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ntr/ntab180

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

10 Check pending · 6 No full text of the sources · 6 Not checked yet · 3 Own interpretation · 1 Sources not found

Verify all 23 references — free account

Show all 10 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 7
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 10
16 of 16
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Colonization determines whose values and knowledges are privileged.

    “Colonization also determines whose values and knowledges are privileged.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There are many different species of tobacco plants indigenous to Turtle Island, including Nicotiana rustica and Nicotiana tabacum.

    “There are many different species of tobacco plants indigenous to Turtle Island, including Nicotiana rustica and Nicotiana tabacum .”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Before colonization, many Indigenous peoples used tobacco as a sacred medicinal plant in ceremonial and cultural practices, often to promote wellness for individuals and communities.

    “Before colonization, many Indigenous peoples used tobacco as a sacred medicinal plant in ceremonial and cultural practices, often to promote wellness for individuals and communities.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Some Indigenous peoples do not use tobacco, but use different plants such as red willow, which they refer to as 'ceremonial tobacco,' 'sacred tobacco,' 'traditional tobacco,' or 'natural tobacco.'

    “Some Indigenous peoples do not use tobacco, but different types of plants, such as red willow (the Lakota's Ca ŋ sasa and the Anishinaabe's Asemaa). Even though red willow is not a Nicotiana species plant, these tribes refer to these plants as 'ceremonial tobacco,' 'sacred tobacco,' 'traditional tobacco,' or 'natural tobacco.'”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    European settlers industrialized and modified tobacco, developing it as a plantation crop.

    “Years later, European settlers continued this pattern of colonization by industrializing and modifying tobacco-developing the tobacco plant as a plantation crop.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Subsequent mass production and distribution of adulterated tobacco in cigarettes resulted in commercial tobacco products being available in large quantities and low-cost, readily accessible forms.

    “Subsequent mass production and distribution of adulterated tobacco, in the form of cigarettes, have resulted in commercial tobacco products being available in large quantities and low-cost, readily accessible forms.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The widespread availability of commercial tobacco products, historical restrictions on ceremonial tobacco products, tobacco industry's exploitation of tribal sovereignty through tax-exempt tribal cigarette sales and heavy promotion at tribal enterprises, and targeted marketing to Indigenous peoples have enabled frequent use and dependence among Indigenous communities, with serious effects on user’

    “The widespread availability of commercial tobacco products, the historical restrictions on ceremonial tobacco products, the tobacco industry's exploitation of tribal sovereignty through tax-exempt tribal cigarette sales and heavy promotion at tribal enterprises, and the Industry's targeted marketing of commercial tobacco products to Indigenous peoples have enabled frequent use and dependence among”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    These forms of colonization tactics have complicated public health efforts aimed at reducing harms of commercial tobacco in Indigenous communities.

    “These forms of colonization tactics have complicated public health efforts aimed at reducing harms of commercial tobacco in Indigenous communities.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Globally, the language used in public health to discuss commercial tobacco prevention and control is overwhelmingly deficit-based.

    “Globally, the language used in public health to discuss commercial tobacco prevention and control is overwhelmingly deficit-based.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Regulatory efforts internationally aim to reduce access and availability of commercial tobacco products by increasing costs, restricting sales to specific persons and places, and excluding tobacco use in some places.

    “Regulatory efforts internationally aim to reduce the access and availability of commercial tobacco products by increasing costs (eg, taxes), while restricting sales to specific persons (eg, underage sales) and in designated places (eg, pharmacies).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Some health experts have called for a 'tobacco endgame,' or the eradication of all tobacco products.

    “Some health experts have called for a 'tobacco endgame,' or the eradication of all tobacco products.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Indigenous peoples remain steadfastly resistant and resilient in the face of colonization and its many forms.

    “Indigenous peoples remain steadfastly resistant and resilient in the face of colonization and its many forms”
12 of 12

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Final report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada, 2015, Volume One, Summary: Honouring the Truth, Reconciling for the Future
  2. Inouye, 1992, Discrimination and Native American religious rights, UWLA L Rev, 23, 13

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 49

Metadata

Authors
Nez Henderson, P., Lee, J. P., Soto, C., O′Leary, R., Rutan, E., D′Silva, J., Waa, A., Henderson, Z. P., Nez, S. S., & Maddox, R.
Affiliations
  • Navajo Nation (Diné), Rapid City, SD, USA
  • Pacific Institute For Research and Evaluation (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa, Timber Lake, SD, USA
  • Black Hills Center for American Indian Health (US)
  • ClearWay Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • Australian National University (AU)
Venue
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Published
2021-09-13
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
289-291
ISSN
  • 1462-2203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-994X
OpenAlex
W3201474739
Cited by
49
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1R01ES027793-01, 1S06GM123544)
  • University of California (T30IR0933)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
Keywords
decolonization, tobacco, indigenous peoples, colonization, Indigenous health, medicinal plants, UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, tobacco industry, Indigenous sovereignty, Indigenous self-determination, tobacco control, Indigenous health services
MeSH terms
Humans, Indians, North American, North America, Tobacco Products, Tobacco Use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review