Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 221

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How should we define light or intermittent smoking? Does it matter?

Open access
Husten, C. G.·2009·Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Abstract

What terms are used to describe LITS in the literature, and how has each term been defi ned?Multiple terms are used in the literature to describe light or intermittent smokers, but these terms are not defi ned consistently ( Tables 1 and2 ).Defi nitions were often different for studies among adolescent smokers than for those with adult smokers, but this difference in the populations studied does not explain range of defi nitions noted.Light smoking has the widest set of defi nitions, ranging from " denied ever smoking regularly and denied any smoking within the past 30 days " to smoking 1 -39 cigarettes per week to smoking 10 -20 cigarettes per day (CPD) (

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ntr/ntp010

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 221

Metadata

Authors
Husten, C. G.
Venue
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Published
2009-03-05
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
111-121
ISSN
  • 1462-2203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-994X
OpenAlex
W2089486993
Cited by
221
References
8
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How should we define light or intermittent smoking? Does it matter? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ntr/ntp010
The paper
Husten, C. G. (2009). How should we define light or intermittent smoking? Does it matter? Nicotine & Tobacco Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntp010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.