Cited by 54

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of Snuff and Smoking Habits in Early Pregnancy on Risks for Stillbirth and Early Neonatal Mortality

Baba, S., Wikstrom, A.-K., Stephansson, O., Cnattingius, S.·2014·Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Abstract

Introduction Prenatal exposure to Swedish snuff (including nicotine and other components in grinded tobacco) is reported to increase stillbirth risk, but the effect of snuff on early neonatal mortality is unknown. Prenatal smoking exposure is associated with risks for both stillbirth and early neonatal mortality. We aimed to study if women who quit using snuff or quit smoking before first antenatal visit reduce their risks. Methods In a nationwide study of 851,371 singleton births in Sweden from 1999 to 2010, we used multiple logistic regression models to examine associations between cessation or continuation of snuff use or smoking and risks for stillbirth (at 28 weeks or later) and early neonatal mortality (death during the first week of life). Results Compared with nontobacco users, snuff users and smokers in early pregnancy had increased risks for stillbirths, and adjusted odds ratios (ORs), with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were 1.43 (1.02-1.99) and 1.59 (1.40-1.80), respectively. Women who stopped using snuff or stopped smoking before first visit to antenatal care had no increased risks. Compared with nontobacco users, smokers had an increased risk for early neonatal mortality (adjusted OR = 1.37 [95% CI 1.11-1.71]). Women who stopped smoking and snuff users in early pregnancy had no increased risks of early neonatal mortality. Conclusions Both snuff and smoking influence risk for stillbirth, and women who stop using snuff or smoking have a similar stillbirth risk as…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ntr/ntt117

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Baba, 2012, European journal of epidemiology, 27, 297, 10.1007/s10654-012-9676-8 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 2011, Pediatrics, 128, 177, 10.1542/peds.2011-1037 · DOI
  3. Benowitz, 1997, Advances in Dental Research, 11, 336, 10.1177/08959374970110030501 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Cnattingius, 1988, BMJ, 297, 258, 10.1136/bmj.297.6643.258 · DOI
  5. Flenady, 2011, Lancet, 377, 1703, 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60064-0 · DOI
  6. Foulds, 2003, Tobacco Control, 12, 349, 10.1136/tc.12.4.349 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Armitage, 2007, Lancet, 369, 2010, 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60677-1 · DOI
  8. Goldenberg, 2008, Lancet, 371, 75, 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 2007, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 114, 699, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01340.x · DOI
  10. KLEINMAN, 1988, American Journal of Epidemiology, 127, 274, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114803 · DOI
  11. Lambers, 1996, Seminars in perinatology, 20, 115, 10.1016/S0146-0005(96)80079-6 · DOI
  12. Ludvigsson, 2009, European journal of epidemiology, 24, 659, 10.1007/s10654-009-9350-y · DOI
  13. McAllister-Sistilli, 1998, Psychoneuroendocrinology, 23, 175, 10.1016/S0306-4530(97)00080-2 · DOI
  14. Raymond, 1994, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 101, 301, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13614.x · DOI
  15. 2011, Placenta, 32, 153, 10.1016/j.placenta.2010.11.010 · DOI
  16. 2008, NICOTINE TOBACCO RESEARCH, 10, 159, 10.1080/14622200701705431 · DOI
  17. Smith, 2007, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 109, 144, 10.1097/01.AOG.0000248536.94919.e3 · DOI
  18. 2008, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 115, 1405, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01867.x · DOI · Paper page
  19. Suzuki, 1971, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 111, 1092, 10.1016/0002-9378(71)90109-8 · DOI
  20. 2010, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 117, 1005, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02575.x · DOI · Paper page
  21. Wisborg, 2001, American Journal of Epidemiology, 154, 322, 10.1093/aje/154.4.322 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 54

Metadata

Authors
Baba, S., Wikstrom, A.-K., Stephansson, O., & Cnattingius, S.
Venue
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Published
2013-08-13
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
78-83
ISSN
  • 1462-2203
  • 1469-994X
Cited by
54
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review