Cited by 48

Effect of Swedish snuff (snus) on preterm birth

Wikström, A‐K, Cnattingius, S, Galanti, MR, Kieler, H, Stephansson, O·2010·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Please cite this paper as: Wikström A‐K, Cnattingius S, Galanti M, Kieler H, Stephansson O. Effect of Swedish snuff (snus) on preterm birth. BJOG 2010;117:1005–1010. Objective To compare the effects of Swedish snuff and cigarette smoking on risks of preterm birth. Design Population‐based cohort study. Setting Sweden. Population All live, singleton births in Sweden 1999–2006. Methods Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to estimate relative risks for preterm birth in snuff users (n = 7607), light smokers (1–9 cigarettes/day; n = 41 436) and heavy smokers (ten or more cigarettes/day; n = 16 951) using non‐tobacco users (n = 503 957) as reference. Main outcome measures Very (<32 weeks) and moderately (32–36 weeks) preterm birth. Results Compared with non‐tobacco users, snuff users had increased risks of both very (adjusted OR 1.38; 95% CI 1.04–1.83) and moderately (adjusted OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.12–1.40) preterm birth. Compared with non‐tobacco users, light smokers had increased risks of both very (adjusted OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.42–1.81) and moderately (adjusted OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.12–1.24) preterm birth, and heavy smokers had even higher risks. Among smokers, but not among snuff users, the risk was more pronounced for spontaneous than induced preterm birth. Conclusions The use of Swedish snuff was associated with increased risks of very and moderately preterm birth with both spontaneous and induced onsets. Swedish snuff is not a safe alternative to cigarette smoking during pregnancy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02575.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among women who use snus during pregnancy, there are increased risks of very preterm (> 32 weeks) birth (aOR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.04-1.83) and moderately preterm (32-36 weeks) birth (aOR = 1.25; 95% CI: 1.12-1.40).

    “Increased risks of very (> 32 weeks)(aOR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.04-1.83)and moderately (32-36 weeks) (aOR = 1.25; 95% CI: 1.12-1.40)preterm birth among women who use snus during pregnancy (Wikström et al. 2010a)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wikström, A., Cnattingius, S., Galanti, M., Kieler, H., & Stephansson, O.
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-06-08
Volume
117
Issue
8
Pages
1005-1010
ISSN
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
Cited by
48
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review