Effect of Swedish snuff (snus) on preterm birth
Abstract
Please cite this paper as: Wikström A‐K, Cnattingius S, Galanti M, Kieler H, Stephansson O. Effect of Swedish snuff (snus) on preterm birth. BJOG 2010;117:1005–1010. Objective To compare the effects of Swedish snuff and cigarette smoking on risks of preterm birth. Design Population‐based cohort study. Setting Sweden. Population All live, singleton births in Sweden 1999–2006. Methods Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to estimate relative risks for preterm birth in snuff users (n = 7607), light smokers (1–9 cigarettes/day; n = 41 436) and heavy smokers (ten or more cigarettes/day; n = 16 951) using non‐tobacco users (n = 503 957) as reference. Main outcome measures Very (<32 weeks) and moderately (32–36 weeks) preterm birth. Results Compared with non‐tobacco users, snuff users had increased risks of both very (adjusted OR 1.38; 95% CI 1.04–1.83) and moderately (adjusted OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.12–1.40) preterm birth. Compared with non‐tobacco users, light smokers had increased risks of both very (adjusted OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.42–1.81) and moderately (adjusted OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.12–1.24) preterm birth, and heavy smokers had even higher risks. Among smokers, but not among snuff users, the risk was more pronounced for spontaneous than induced preterm birth. Conclusions The use of Swedish snuff was associated with increased risks of very and moderately preterm birth with both spontaneous and induced onsets. Swedish snuff is not a safe alternative to cigarette smoking during pregnancy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among women who use snus during pregnancy, there are increased risks of very preterm (> 32 weeks) birth (aOR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.04-1.83) and moderately preterm (32-36 weeks) birth (aOR = 1.25; 95% CI: 1.12-1.40).
“Increased risks of very (> 32 weeks)(aOR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.04-1.83)and moderately (32-36 weeks) (aOR = 1.25; 95% CI: 1.12-1.40)preterm birth among women who use snus during pregnancy (Wikström et al. 2010a)”
From Comparison of the Health Effects Associated with the Use of Snus and Tobacco-Free Oral Nicotine Pouches: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Wikström et al. 2010a
Cites
A quality study of a medical birth registry
Cnattingius, S., Ericson, A., Gunnarskog, J., & Källén, B. (1990) · Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine · doi:10.1177/140349489001800209 · Cited by 972 · see citing works
Self-citationSelf-reported nicotine exposure and plasma levels of cotinine in early and late pregnancy
GEORGE, L., GRANATH, F., JOHANSSON, A. L. V., & CNATTINGIUS, S. (2006) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1080/00016340600935433 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Spindel, E. R., & McEvoy, C. T. (2016) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201510-2013pp · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Baba, S., Wikström, A., Stephansson, O., & Cnattingius, S. (2013) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12067 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationGunnerbeck, A., Edstedt Bonamy, A.-K., Wikström, A.-K., Granath, F., Wickström, R., & Cnattingius, S. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084715 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
“Today, there is increasing knowledge of harmful effects of snuff use during pregnancy [16–18], while large-scale safety studies on adverse effects of nicotine replacement therapy during pregnancy are lacking [6].”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe effect of swedish snuff (snus) on offspring birthweight: a sibling analysis
Juárez, S. P., & Merlo, J. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065611 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Kopa-Stojak, P. N., & Pawliczak, R. (2026) · Exposure and Health · doi:10.1007/s12403-026-00812-w
- Authors
- Wikström, A., Cnattingius, S., Galanti, M., Kieler, H., & Stephansson, O.
- Venue
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-06-08
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1005-1010
- ISSN
- 1470-0328
- 1471-0528
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review